Skip to main content

Judging and the Ethical Life

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
How to Measure the Quality of Judicial Reasoning

Part of the book series: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice ((IUSGENT,volume 69))

  • 730 Accesses

Abstract

This paper seeks to answer a prior question before one can look at how to measure judicial quality. That question is what is it that we expect a judge to do and to be. And that question has to be answered in the context of what we take to be what I call the ethical life of the law and of the judge. What I have argued for is that the judge stands in an anxious place, ‘the middle’, marrying both the universal law and the particular decision, cognisant of the general law and also cognisant of the particular individual or case that they encounter. The paper explores that place and how to teach the judge to use the anxiety therein creatively and not run away from it by collapsing that space into either the universal law or the particular decision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This paper is a reworked and updated version of ‘In the Judgement Place’ in Bankowski (2006), pp. 23–39.

  2. 2.

    See Detmold (1989) whose example I adapt.

  3. 3.

    See the memoirs of the English hangman, (Pierrepoint 1977) who came to realise that he was doing this. See also William Calley who was responsible for the My Lai massacre in the Viet Nam War said ‘personally I did not kill any Vietnamese that day: I mean personally I represented the United States of America. My country.’ quoted in Bourke (2010, 226).

  4. 4.

    See Detmold for this argument about the existence of the particular.

  5. 5.

    I am deeply indebted to Claire Henderson Davis for many insights and fruitful collaboration. See also our joint piece Bankowski and Davis (2000).

  6. 6.

    See Selznick (1992).

  7. 7.

    This of course has its problems and it is not to be taken as saying that one should decide cases by looking at the practice of, for example, estate agents!

  8. 8.

    The project was generously funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) in the United Kingdom. See Bankowski and Del Mar (2013) and Bankowski et al. (2012).

References

  • Anderson B (1996) ‘Discovery’ in legal decision-making. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bankowski Z (2006) In the judgement space: the anxiety of the encounter. In: Bankowski Z, MacLean J (eds) The universal and the particular in legal reasoning. Ashgate, London, pp 25–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Bankowski Z, Davis C (2000) Living in and out of the law. In: Oliver P, Tadros V, Douglas-Scott S (eds) Faith in law: essays in legal theory. Hart Publishing, Oxford, Portland, pp 33–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Bankowski Z, Del Mar M (eds) (2013) The moral imagination and the legal life: beyond text in legal education. Ashgate Pub. Ltd., Burlington, VT

    Google Scholar 

  • Bankowski Z, Del Mar M, Maharg P (eds) (2012) The arts and the legal academy beyond text in legal education. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke J (2010) An intimate history of killing: face-to-face killing in twentieth century warfare. Repr. Basic Books, LaVergne, TN USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins HM (1990) Artificial experts: social knowledge and intelligent machines. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis CH (2005) Love/beloved: dancing the divine encounter. Faith and the Arts, [s.l.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Detmold MJ (1989) Law as practical reason. Cambridge Law J 48(3):436–471. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300109730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detmold MJ (1984) The unity of law and morality: a refutation of legal positivism. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz MG (1988) Between the human and the divine: the political thought of simone weil. Rowman & Littlefield, Totowa, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus HL, Dreyfus SE (1986) Mind over machine: the power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton T (1990) The ideology of the aesthetic. Cambridge, Mass., USA, Blackwell, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Ealing London Borough Council v Race Relations Board Ealing London Borough Council v Race Relations Board: HL 16 Dec 1971

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaita R (2000) A common humanity: thinking about love & truth & justice. Text Pub, Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton R (1994) Maria von Herbert’s challenge to Kant. In: Singer P (ed) Ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 281–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn KN (1960) The common law tradition. Deciding Appeals, Little, Brown, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke 18, 2-8 RSV

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke 18, 10-14

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCormick N (1978) Legal reasoning and legal theory. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierrepoint A (1977) Executioner: Pierrepoint: [the amazing autobiography of the world’s most famous executioner], 3. impr. Hodder and Stoughton, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Adam Readings in Classical SF. In: Alien Online. http://www.thealienonline.net

  • Rose G (1992) The broken middle: out of our ancient society. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick P (1992) The moral commonwealth: social theory and the promise of community. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Shytov AN (2001) Conscience and love in making judicial decisions. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Soosay S (2006) Skills, habits and expertise in the life of the law. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Twining W (1973) Karl Llewellyn and the realist movement. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil S (1951) Waiting for god. Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zenon Bańkowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bańkowski, Z. (2018). Judging and the Ethical Life. In: Bencze, M., Ng, G. (eds) How to Measure the Quality of Judicial Reasoning. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 69. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97316-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97316-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97315-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97316-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics