Skip to main content

Firefly as Philosophy: Social Contracts, Political Dissent, and Virtuous Communities

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Popular Culture as Philosophy
  • 237 Accesses

Abstract

A careful analysis of Joss Whedon’s Firefly and subsequent motion picture Serenity demonstrates how the series and film put forth a distinctive philosophical perspective on government, its political authority, the extent to which one is bound to its laws, and how the state ideally ought to be arranged so that its citizens may aspire toward the good life. Although Firefly’s and Serenity’s implicit philosophical theory has some affinities with the views of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Aristotle, it also provides a novel and intriguing synthesis of their views. Consequently, the careful viewer is able to assess the theory on its own merits, both for its conceptual coherence and its viability as a working social-political theory (or the next best thing if no other proper social arrangements are available).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aristotle. 1925. Nicomachean ethics. Trans. W. D. Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, John G. 1979. A note on Locke’s theory of tacit consent. Philosophical Review 88 (2): 224–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, Susanne, and James South. 2013. Social contract: Rebellion and dissent aboard Serenity. In Homer Simpson Ponders politics, ed. Joseph Foy and Timothy Dale, 63–74. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foy, Joseph. 2011. The state of nature and social contracts on spaceship Serenity. In The philosophy of Joss Whedon, ed. Dean A. Kowalski and S. Evan Kreider, 39–54. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foy, Joseph J., and Dean A. Kowalski. 2011. Seeking authenticity in the Whedonverse. In The philosophy of Joss Whedon, ed. Dean A. Kowalski and S. Evan Kreider, 151–167. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, Thomas. 1660. The leviathan. London: Penguin Classics, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, Dean A. 2017. Joss Whedon as philosopher. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, John. 1689. The second treatise of government. New York: Barnes & Noble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartenberg, Thomas. 2007. Thinking on screen: Film as philosophy. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dean A. Kowalski .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Kowalski, D.A. (2020). Firefly as Philosophy: Social Contracts, Political Dissent, and Virtuous Communities. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Popular Culture as Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97134-6_28-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97134-6_28-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97134-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97134-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics