Abstract
At first glance, Squid Game may appear to be about how the rich have the power to oppress the poor, about economic inequality and capitalism, or about class struggle. The series touches on all of these, but at the center of it, Squid Game shows how democracy is used as a tool for control. Given the right motivation, the rule of the many can be manipulated to benefit the interests of the few and, in some cases, to coerce the minority. Despite the advantages of democracy, the series portrays how democracy can be less than ideal, rotten, and dysfunctional. An investigation of the turn of events in the series reveals at least five myths about democracy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agra, A.C. 1997. A Q & A primer on the Philippine party-list system: A list proportional representation scheme of electing one-fifth of the members of the house of representatives. Manila: Rex Bookstore.
Albert, E. 2020. North Korea’s power structure. Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/north-koreas-power-structure
Aristotle. C. Lord. 2013. Aristotle’s politics. 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
———. R. C. Bartlett, and S. D. Collins 2011. Aristotle’s Nicomachean ethics. Cambridge: University of Chicago Press.
Arneson, R. 2013. Egalitarianism. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta.. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/egalitarianism/
Carnevale, Anthony P., Megan L. Fasules, Michael C. Quinn, and Kathryn Peltier Campbell. 2019. Born to win, schooled to lose: Why equally talented students don’t get equal chances to be all they can be. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce. A brief summary of the work can be found at: https://cew.georgetown.edu/cew-reports/schooled2lose/
Chaffee, J. 2011. The philosopher’s way: A text with readings. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Christiano, T., and S. Bajaj. 2022. Democracy. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta.. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/democracy
Economist Intelligence Unit. 2021. Democracy index 2021: The China challenge. https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2021
Flynn, M., and C. Ball. 2020. Understanding service leavers aged 50+: Their challenges and experiences in the civilian jobs market. London: The Officers’ Association.
Gordon, J.S. n.d.. Moral egalitarianism. Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/moral-egalitarianism
Halliday, Daniel. 2018. Inheritance of wealth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
HHS. 2021. HHS announces rule to protect consumers from surprise medical bills. July 1. https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2021/07/01/hhs-announces-rule-to-protect-consumers-from-surprise-medical-bills.html
Hobbes, T. 1651. Leviathan. London: St. Paul’s Churchyard. https://philo-labo.fr/fichiers/Hobbes%20-%20L%C3%A9viathan%20(gutenberg).pdf.
Hursthouse, R., and G. Pettigrove. 2018. Virtue ethics. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/ethics-virtue
Kirkpatrick, M. 2016. Freedom from fear: Not in North Korea. The Catalyst. https://www.bushcenter.org/catalyst/freedom/kirkpatrick-freedom-north-korea.html
Kuyper, J. 2015. Global democracy. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/global-democracy/#DemGloNatSta
O’Connor, T., and C. Franklin. 2018. Free will. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/freewill/#NatuFreeWill
Plato, and D. Gallop. 2002. Plato Phaedo. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Post, R. 2005. Democracy and equality. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Science 603 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205282.
Robeyns, I., and M.F. Byskov. 2021. The capability approach. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/capability-approach
Sen, A. 1993. Capability and well-being. In Nussbaum Sen the quality of life, 30–53. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Son, S. 2021. Squid game: The real debt crisis shaking South Korea that inspired the hit TV show. The Conversation, Oct 7. https://theconversation.com/squid-game-the-real-debt-crisis-shaking-south-korea-that-inspired-the-hit-tv-show-169401
Trobaugh, E.M. 2018. Women, regardless: Understanding gender bias in U.S. military integration. Joint Force Quarterly 88. National Defense University Press. https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Publications/Article/1411860/women-regardless-understanding-gender-bias-in-us-military-integration
Welzel, C., and R. Inglehart. 2008. Democracy as human empowerment: The role of ordinary people in the emergence and survival of democracy. UC Irvine: Center for the Study of Democracy. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3tj7c4bb.
Wong, A.C. 2022. Philippine elections and the politics behind it. The interpreter. Lowy Institute. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/philippine-elections-and-politics-behind-it
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Marquez, L.P., Ombao, R.P. (2023). Squid Game as Philosophy: The Myths of Democracy. In: Kowalski, D.A., Lay, C., S. Engels, K. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Popular Culture as Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97134-6_113-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97134-6_113-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97134-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97134-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities