Abstract
The study presented in this chapter compares European and US social psychology through the analysis of papers published by two pivotal journals in the discipline: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and the European Journal of Social Psychology. Scientific production can be considered a starting point for the study of the history of a discipline as it includes theories, application domains and methods that contribute to delineate its trajectory. All the abstracts (from the first publication to the last one in 2016) of the papers of the two journals were collected. By means of a correspondence analysis, the existence of a latent temporal pattern in keywords’ occurrences was explored. Furthermore, in order to detect, retrieve and compare the main topics the journals dealt with over time, an analysis implemented by means of Reinert’s method was conducted. The topics evolution along time was thus observed and matched in the two journals. Results showed that the two journals have common trajectories particularly in their inception (among others, studies on aggression and attribution) and more recently (among others, studies on gender by means of implicit measures and culture). However, the distinctive feature that characterises the US social psychology, that is the attention on the individual aspects, and the one that characterises the European one, that is the attention on social aspects, seems to remain.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
The broad label “American social psychology” is used in reference to North America, the USA in particular.
- 3.
References
Allport, F. (1924). Social psychology. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Allport, G. W. (1954). The historical background of modern social psychology. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 3–56). Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Allport, G. W. (1968). The historical background of modern social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, 2nd ed., pp. 1–80). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Allport, G. W. (1985). The historical background of modern social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, 3rd ed., pp. 1–46). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). Encyclopedia of social psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bolasco, S. (2013). L’analisi automatica dei testi: fare ricerca con il text mining. Roma: Carocci.
Contarello, A., & Mazzara, B. M. (2000). Le dimensioni sociali dei processi psicologici: individui, contesti, appartenenze. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
Danziger, K. (1995). Neither science nor history? Psychological Inquiry, 6(2), 115–117.
Farr, R. M. (1996). The roots of modern social psychology, 1872–1954. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Fisch, R., & Daniel, H. D. (1982). Research and publication trends in experimental social psychology: 1971–1980—a thematic analysis of the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, the European Journal of Social Psychology, and the Zeifschrift für Sozialpsychologie. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12(4), 395–412.
Fiske, S., & Taylor, S. E. (1982). Social Cognition. New York: Random House.
Graumann, C. F. (1995/1999). The origins of the EAESP: Social psychology in Europe. Retrieved from http://www.easp.eu/history/?
Jaspars, J. (1986). Forum and focus: A personal view of European social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16(1), 3–15.
Jones, E. E. (1985). Major developments in social psychology during the past five decades. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology(3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 47–107). New York: Random House.
Katz, D. (1965). Editorial. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(1), 1–2.
Katz, D. (1966). Editorial. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(1), 1–2.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Stroebe, W. (2012). The making of social psychology. In A. W. Kruglanski & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Handbook of the history of social psychology (pp. 3–17). New York: Psychology Press.
Lebart, L., Salem, A., & Berry, L. (1998). Exploring textual data. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Lubek, I., & Apfelbaum, E. (2000). A critical gaze and wistful glance at handbook histories of social psychology: Did the successive accounts by Gordon Allport and successors historiographically succeed? Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 36(4), 405–428.
Manstead, A. S., Hewstone, M. E., Fiske, S. T., Hogg, M. A., Reis, H. T., & Semin, G. R. (1995). The Blackwell Encyclopedia of social psychology. Oxford: Blackwell Reference/Blackwell Publishers.
Moretti, F. (2013). Distant reading. London, UK: Verso/New Left Books.
Moscovici, S. (1999). Ringraziamento. In Laurea Honoris Causa in Psicologia a Serge Moscovici. Università degli studi di Roma “La Sapienza”: Centro Stampa d’Ateneo.
Moscovici, S., & Markova, I. (2006). The making of modern social psychology. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
Palmonari, A., & Emiliani, F. (2014). Introduzione: La teoria delle rappresentazioni sociali nell’evoluzione della psicologia sociale. In A. Palmonari & F. Emiliani (Eds.), Psicologia delle rappresentazioni sociali. Teoria e applicazioni (pp. 7–40). Bologna, Il Mulino.
Ratinaud, P. (2014). Visualisation chronologique des analyses ALCESTE: application à Twitter avec l’exemple du hashtag# mariagepourtous. In Actes des 12es Journées internationales d’Analyse statistique des Données Textuelles. Paris: Sorbonne Nouvelle–Inalco.
Reinert, M. (1986). Un logiciel d’analyse lexicale: Alceste. Les Cahiers d’Analyse des Données, 9(4).
Reinert, M. (1993). Les «mondes lexicaux» et leur «logique» àtravers l’analyse statistique d’un corpus de récits de cauchemars. Langage et Societe, 66, 5–39.
Ross, L., Lepper, M., & Ward, A. (2010). History of social psychology: Insights, challenges, and contributions to theory and application. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, 5th ed., pp. 3–50). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Sbalchiero, S., & Tuzzi, A. (2016). Scientists’ spirituality in scientists’ words. Assessing and enriching the results of a qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews by means of quantitative approaches. Quality and Quantity, 50(3), 1333–1348.
Scherer, K. R. (1992). Social psychology evolving. A progress report. In M. Dierkes & B. Biervert (Eds.), European social science in transition: assessment and outlook (pp. 178–243). Campus, Westview, Frankfurt: Boulder.
Scherer, K. R. (1993). Two faces of social psychology: European and North American perspectives. Social Science Information, 32(4), 515–552.
Tesser, A. (1991). Editorial. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 349–350.
Trevisani, M., & Tuzzi, A. (2015). A portrait of JASA: The history of Statistics through analysis of keyword counts in an early scientific journal. Quality and Quantity, 49, 1287–1304.
Trevisani, M., & Tuzzi, A. (2018). Learning the evolution of disciplines from scientific literature. A functional clustering approach to normalized keyword count trajectories. Knowledge-Based Systems, 146, 129–141.
Tuzzi, A. (2003). L’analisi del contenuto: introduzione ai metodi e alle tecniche di ricerca. Roma: Carrocci.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rizzoli, V. (2018). Histories of Social Psychology in Europe and North America, as Seen from Research Topics in Two Key Journals. In: Tuzzi, A. (eds) Tracing the Life Cycle of Ideas in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Quantitative Methods in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97064-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97064-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97063-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97064-6
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)