Skip to main content

Constipation, Faecal and Urinary Incontinence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advanced Age Geriatric Care
  • 1615 Accesses

Abstract

Constipation is a common problem in the elderly. Slow colon transit, irritable bowel syndrome and pelvic floor dysfunction are three distinct pathophysiologies causing constipation. Many age-related problems such as multiple medical conditions, increased use of medications, decreased mobility and dietary changes contribute to constipation. Secondary constipation is due to neurological diseases, endocrine and metabolic diseases, psychological conditions and structural abnormalities. There are three types of faecal incontinence: (i) urge incontinence, (ii) passive incontinence, and (iii) faecal seepage. Choice of proper therapy will depend on the cause and severity of the incontinence. Urinary incontinence (UI) is one of the biggest challenges facing the elderly population. In the elderly, the risk factors are multifactorial, among them being age-related changes, comorbidity, polypharmacy and functional impairments. Treatment of UI includes behavioural and pharmacological interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gallagher P, O’Mahony D. Constipation in old age. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;23(6):875–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2009.09.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brandt LJ, Prather CH, Quigley EM, Schiller LC, Schoenfeld P, Talley NJ. Systematic review on the management of chronic constipation in North America. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(Suppl 1):S5–S21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sonnenberg A, Koch T. Epidemiology of constipation in United States. Dis Colon Rectum. 1989;32:1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stewart WF, Liberman JN, Sandler RS, Woods MS, Stemhaagen A, Chee E, et al. Epidemiology of constipation (EPOC) in the United States: relation of clinical subtypes to socio-demographic features. Am Gastroenterol. 1999;94:530–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Primrose WL,Caperwell HE, Simpson GK, Smith RG. Prescribed patterns observed in registered nursing homes and long stay geriatric wards. Age and Aging 1987;16:28–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bosshard W, Dreher R, Schnegg J-F, Bula CJ. The treatment of chronic constipation in elderly people: an update. Drugs Aging. 2004;21:911–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Talley NJ, O’Keefe EA, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ 3rd. Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in the elderly: a population based study. Gastrenterology. 1992;102:895–901.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Scheffer DC, Cheskin LJ. Constipation in the elderly. Am Fam Physician. 1998;58(4):907–14.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mertz H, Naliboff B, Mager E. Physiology of refractory chronic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;94(3):608–15.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miller-Lissner S. General geriatrics and gastroenterology: constipation and faecal incontinence. Best Prac Res Clin Gastroenterol. 16:115–33.

    Google Scholar 

  11. De Giorgio R, Ruggeri E, Stanghellini V, Eusebi LH, Bazzoli F, Chiarioni G. Chronic constipation in the elderly: a primer for the gastroenterologist. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015;15:130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-015-0366-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Choung RS, Rey E, Richard Locke G 3rd, Schleck CD, Baum C, Zinsmeister AR, et al. Chronic constipation and co-morbidities: a prospective population-based nested case-control study. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2010;4(1):142–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. SSc R, Go JT. Update on the management of constipation in the elderly: new treatment options. Clin Interv Aging. 2010;5:163–71.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gartlehner G, Jonas DE, Morgan LC, Ringel Y, Hanen RA, Byrant CM, et al. Drug class review: constipation drugs: final report [Internet]. Portland (OR): Oregon Health & Science University. 2007. https://www.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/books/NBK10506/table/A7report=objectonly. Accessed 22 June 2017.

  15. Hussain ZH, Whitehead DA, Lacy BE. Fecal impaction. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2014;16(9):404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-014-0404-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Falcon S, Lopez BM, Munoz M, Sanchez A, Rey E. Faecal impaction A systematic review of its medical complications. BMC Geriatr. 2016;16:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0162-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tracey J. Fecal impaction: not always a benign condition. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2000;30(3):228–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Faecal Incontinence

  1. Rao SS. Diagnosis and management of faecal incontinence. Ameican Journal Gastroenterology Parameters Committee Am J Gateroenterol. 2004;99:1585–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wald A. Faecal incontinence in the elderly: epidemiology and management. Drugs Aging. 2005;22:132–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gordon PH, Nivatrongs S. Principles and practice of surgery for the colon, rectum and anus. 3rd ed. New York: Information Health Care; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cooper ZR, Rose S. Faecal incontinence: a clinical approach. Mt Sinai J Med. 2000;67:96–105.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Norton C, Whitehead WE, Bliss DLZ, Harari D, Lang J. Management of fecal incontinence in adults: report from the 4th international consultation on incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):199–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Roberts RO, Jacobson SJ, Reilly WT, Pemberton JH, Lieber MM, Talley NJ. Prevalence of combined faecal and urinary incontinence: a community-based study. J Am Cleveland Soc. 1999;47:837–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tobin GW, Brocklehurst JC. Faecal incontinence in residential homes for the elderly: prevalence, aetiology and management. Age Aging. 1988;15:41–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson JF, Lafforty J. Epidemiology of faecal incontinence: the silent affliction. J Gastroenterol. 1996;91:33–6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dodge J, Bachman C, Silverman H. Fecal incontinence in elderly patients. Postgrad Med. 1988;83(8):258–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36(1):77–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Snooks SJ, Swash M, Setchell M. Injury to innervation of pelvic floor sphincter musculature in child birth. Lancet. 1984;2:546.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lacima G, Pera M. Combined fecal and urinary incontinence: an update. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2003;15(5):405–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nelson RL, Furner SE, Westercamp M, Farquhar C. Cesarean delivery for the prevention of anal incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(2):CD006756. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006756pub2.

  14. Kalantar JS, Howell S, Tallet NJ. Prevalence of faecal incontinence and associated risk factors: an underdiagnosed problem in the Australian community. Med J Aus. 2001;176:54–7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shah BJ, Chokhavatia S, Rose S. Fecal incontinence in the elderly. Am J Gasreroenterol. 2012;107:1635. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2012.284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Madoff RD, Rosen HR, Baeten GG, La Fontaine LJ, Cavine E, Devesa M, et al. Safety and efficacy of dynamic muscle plasty for anal incontinence: lessons from a prospective multicenter trial. Gastroenterology. 1999;116:549–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. BMJ. Managing faecal incontinence. Editorial BMJ. 2005;330:207–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rao SS. Manometric evaluation of defecation disorders: Part II. Faecal incontinence Gastrenterologist. 1997;5(2):99–111.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Read M, Read NW, Barber DC, Duthie H. Effects of loperamide on anal sphincter function in patients complaining of chronic diarrhoea with faecal incontinence and urgency. Dig Dis Sci. 1982;27:807–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Norton C. Outcome of biofeedback for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 1999;86:1159–6321.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Matzell KE, Stadmalier U, Hohenfeliner M, Gall FP. Electrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of fecal incontinence. Lancet 1995;346:1124-.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA, Gold DM, Bartram C, Halligan S, Nicholls RJ. Clinical physiological and radiological study of a new purpose-designed artificial bowel sphincter. Lancet. 1998;352:105–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Urinary Incontinence

  1. Mollander U, Sundh V, Stein G. Urinary incontinence and related symptoms in older men and women studied longitudinally between 70 and 97 years of age. A population study. Arch Geriatr Geront. 2002;35:237–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Couture JA, Valiquette L. Urinary incontinence. Ann Pharmacother. 2000;34(5):646–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research Geriatric Medicine. Urinary Incontinence (Internet) USA Mayo Clinic c2010. http://www.mayo.edu/. Retrieved 4 Aug 2013.

  4. Nakanishi N, Tatara K, Naramura H, Fujiwara H, Tahashima Y, Fukoda H. Urinary and faecal incontinence in a community residing older people in Japan. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;4592:215–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Teunissen TA, van denBosch WJ, van den Hoogen HJ, Largo-Jansson AL. Prevalence of urinary and faecal incontinence among community dwelling elderly patients in Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Ned Tidschr Geneeskf. 2006;150(44):2430–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Inouye SK, Studenski S, Tinett ME, Kuchel GA. Geriatric syndromes: clinical research and policy implications of a core geriatric concept. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:780–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yu L, Thomas JR, Kaltreider L, Hu TW, Igou JF, Dennis PJ. Profile of urinary incontinent elderly in long term care institutions. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990;38:433–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vehkalalahti I, Kivela S-L. Urinary incontinence: and its correlates in very old age. Gerontology. 1985;31:391–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Du Beau CE. Beyond the bladder management of urinary incontinence in older women. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;50:720–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bocon-Gitod L. Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol Update Series. 1997;6:112–6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McConnell JD, Barry MS, Bruskewitz RC. Prostatic hyperplasia, diagnosis, treatment. Clinical practice guide-line. No.8. US Dept health and human services public health service aging for health care policy and research. Rockville.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mathews CA, Whitehind WE, Townsend HK, Grodstein F. Risk factors for urinary and faecal incontinence on nurses’ health study. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(3):539–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schulman C, Claesin H, Matthijs J. Urinary incontinence in Belgium: a population based survey. Eur Urol. 1997;32:315–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Milson I, Ekelund P, Molander U, Arvidsson L, Aresking B. The influence of age, parity, oral contraception, hysterectomy and the menopause in the prevalence of urinary infection in women. J Urol. 1997;149:1459–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Resnick NM, Yalla SV, Laurino E. The pathophysiology of urinary incontinence among institutionalized elderly persons. NEJM. 1989;320:1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Berardelli M, De Rango F, Morelli M, Corsonello A, Mazzei B, Mari V, et al. Urinary incontinence in the elderly and in the oldest old: correlation with frailty and mortality. Rejuvenation Res. 2013;16(3):206–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gibson W, Wagg A. Urinary incontinence in the frail elderly: what do we still need to learn. Clin Pract. 2014;11(4):431–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Frank C, Szlanta A. Office management of urinary incontinence among older patients. Canad Fam Physician. 2010;56:1115–9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kuchel GA, DuBeau CE. Chapter 30: Urinary incontinence in the elderly. Geriatric Nephrology Curriculum Am Soc Nephrol. 2009; 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Merkel JI. Urinary incontinence in the elderly. Southern Med J. 2001;94(10):952–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Donnell PD. Special considerations in elderly individuals with urinary incontinence. Urology 1998;51(2A suppl):20–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ouslander JG. Geriatric urinary incontinence. Dis Mon. 1992;38(2):65–149.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Charalambous S, Trantapylidis Y. Impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life. pelvicperineology.org/june_2009/pdf/impact_of_urinary_incontinence_on_quality_of_life

  24. Weiss BD. Diagnostic evaluation of urinary incontinence in geriatric patients. Am Fam Physician. 1998;57(11):2675–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wyman JF, Harkins SW, Fanti JA. Psychological impact of urinary incontinence in the community dwelling population. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990;38:282–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Malmsten UGH, Milsom I, Molander U, Norlen LJ. Urinary incontinence and lower urinary tract symptoms: an epidemiological study of men aged 45-99 years. J Urol. 1997;158:1733–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ekelund P, Grimby A, Milson I. Urinary incontinence and functional costs high. Br Med J. 1993;306:1344.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wagner TH, Hu TW. Economic costs of urinary in 1955. Urology. 1998;51:355–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gehrich A, Stany MP, Fischer JR, Buller J, Zahn CA. Establishing a mean post void residual volume in asymptomatic premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(4):827–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. United States Department of Health and Human Services agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR). Clinical practice guidelines. Urinary incontinence in adults. Washington DD: United States Department of Health and Human Service Manual, 1992 as quoted by Gehrich et al,2007.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Currie CT. Urinary incontinence after stroke. Brit Med J. 1986;293(6558):1322–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pettersen R, Saxby BK, Wylller TB. Poststroke urinary incontinence: one year outcome and relationship with measures of attentiveness. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(10):15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary Cheuk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Multiple Choice Questions

Multiple Choice Questions

Answers at the end of References

  1. 1.

    The following in relation to constipation are true EXCEPT:

    1. A.

      Constipation in the elderly may be a sign of a more serious underlying problem such as a mass lesion.

    2. B.

      Constipation is three bowel movements per fortnight.

    3. C.

      Frailty and bedridden contributes to increased prevalence.

    4. D.

      Increased use of medications with side-effect profile is an important cause of constipation in the elderly.

  2. 2.

    In the management of chronic constipation in the elderly, the following are true EXCEPT:

    1. A.

      First step is to improve bowel regularity – increased fluid intake, high fibre diet and physical exercise.

    2. B.

      Bulk-forming laxatives increase stool mass softness by absorbing water from the intestinal lumen.

    3. C.

      Impacted faeces are removed by enema, stool softeners and long-term use of laxatives.

    4. D.

      Osmotic laxatives cause secretion of water into the lumen by osmotic activity.

  3. 3.

    The following are true of faecal incontinence, EXCEPT:

    1. A.

      Faecal impaction is associated with faecal incontinence.

    2. B.

      In the elderly faecal incontinence is more often related to multiple medical diagnoses.

    3. C.

      Postsurgical sphincter damage is the commonest cause.

    4. D.

      Diminished sensation and lack of anal contraction ‘winking’ indicate an underlying neurological condition.

  4. 4.

    The following are true of urinary incontinence, EXCEPT:

    1. A.

      In men stress incontinence is uncommon.

    2. B.

      In the elderly common voiding problem is urgency with urge incontinence, and bladder overactivity is a common underlying factor.

    3. C.

      In frail elderly detrusor hyperactivity with impaired contractility (DHIC) leads to decreased post-void residual urine (PVR).

    4. D.

      A PVR of less than 50 ml is indicative of satisfactory bladder emptying.

MCQ Answers

  1. 1.

    A

  2. 2.

    B

  3. 3.

    C

  4. 4.

    C

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cheuk, G., Nagaratnam, N. (2019). Constipation, Faecal and Urinary Incontinence. In: Nagaratnam, N., Nagaratnam, K., Cheuk, G. (eds) Advanced Age Geriatric Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96998-5_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96998-5_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96997-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96998-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics