Abstract
The number of robotic surgeries performed in the United States has been growing over the last decade. There has been a similar growth in academic centers, exposing residents and fellows during their training. As a result, residency programs are now incorporating its use into their training. However, there are no standardized training models, which creates challenges in establishing a uniform curriculum. With current work restrictions, focus on patient safety and minimizing complications, and focus by hospitals on optimizing operative times and block utilization, simulation for advanced technologies and techniques will be required. Unlike laparoscopy, where these skills can be practiced on box trainers or via cost-effective dry labs, this is not an option for robotic surgery training. The cost of acquiring stand-alone simulators and simulator backpacks for robotic consoles, housing a full robotic system solely for training, or having a dual console system is expensive and possibly cost prohibitive, creating a challenge for training the next generation of surgeons. Therefore, programs will need to assess their capabilities in order to develop the best curriculum to teach the fundamentals of robotic surgery. Some programs may have the case volume and access to more robotic resources than others, allowing their trainees to transition into practice using these technologies without further training. While those lacking this may require additional training, whether from fellowships in minimally invasive, robotic surgery, or postgraduate courses. Ultimately, the trainee’s ability to utilize this technology in their future practice will be determined by individual hospitals and their credentialing committees.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ECRI Institute. https://www.ecri.org/Resources/ASG/Robotic_Surgery_Infographic_MS15369_web.pdf. 2015. Accessed 1 Aug 2017.
Mehaffey JH, Michaels AD, Mullen MG, Yount KW, Meneveau MO, Smith PW, Friel CM, Schirmer BD. Adoption of robotics in a general surgery residency program: at what cost? J Surg Res. 2017;213:269–73, ISSN 0022–4804, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.052. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480417301026.
Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery. http://www.flsprogram.org. Accessed 9 Mar 2017.
American Board of Surgery. http://www.absurgery.org/default.jsp?certgsqe_training. Accessed 9 Mar 2017.
da Vinci Surgical Community. www.davincisurgerycommunity.com. Accessed 9 Mar 2017.
Fundamentals of Robotic Surgery. http://frsurgery.org/. Accessed 9 Mar 2017.
Dulan G, et al. Proficiency-based training for robotic surgery: construct validity, workload, and expert levels for nine inanimate exercises. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(6):1516–21.
Farivar BS, Flannagan M, Michael Leitman I. General surgery residents’ perception of robot-assisted procedures during surgical training. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(2):235–42, ISSN 1931-7204, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.09.008. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720414002591.
Winder JS, Juza RM, Sasaki J, et al. Implementing a robotics curriculum at an academic general surgery training program: our initial experience. J Robot Surg. 2016;10:209. https://doi-org.proxy.library.emory.edu/10.1007/s11701-016-0569-9
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stetler, J., Patel, A.D. (2019). Robotic Resident and Fellow Surgery Training. In: Tsuda, S., Kudsi, O. (eds) Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96866-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96866-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96865-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96866-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)