Skip to main content

Robotic Tubo-Ovarian Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • 1297 Accesses

Abstract

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery is still a relatively new innovation in the field of gynecologic surgery. It was developed to overcome difficulties encountered with conventional laparoscopy and has been demonstrated to be just as safe as conventional laparoscopic surgery. Cited advantages of robotic technology over conventional laparoscopy include absence of tremor, three-dimensional image, superior instrument articulation, downscaling of movements, improved surgeon ergonomics, and faster operator learning curve (Obstet Gynecol 125:760–767, 2015). The main drawbacks are prolonged operating times and increase in operating cost (J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20(1):2–9, 2013; Sinha et al., Open J Obstet Gynecol 6:93–102, 2016). There are certain tubo-ovarian procedures that may benefit from the use of the robot, whereas use for other adnexal procedures may be considered excessive. Surgeons must be prudent in patient selection for utilization of robotic-assisted versus conventional approach to laparoscopy. In this chapter, we discuss indications for and describe certain scenarios for robotic-assisted tubo-ovarian surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Robotic surgery in gynecology. Committee Opinion No. 628. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125:760–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. AAGL position statement: robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in benign gynecology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(1):2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sinha R, Sanjay M, Bana R, Jeelani F, Kumari S. Robotic assisted surgery for endometriosis – “is the way forward?”. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;6:93–102. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2016.62011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nezhat FR. Sirota perioperative outcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopy surgery for advanced-stage endometriosis. JSLS. 2014;18(4). pii: e2014.00094. doi: https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2014.00094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. George K, Kamath MS, Tharyan P. Minimally invasive versus open surgery for reversal of tubal sterilization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(2). Art. No.: CD009174. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009174.pub2.

  6. Boeckxstaens A, Devroey P, Collins J, Tournaye H. Getting pregnant after tubal sterilization: surgical reversal or IVF? Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erica Stockwell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stockwell, E. (2019). Robotic Tubo-Ovarian Surgery. In: Tsuda, S., Kudsi, O. (eds) Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96866-7_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96866-7_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96865-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96866-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics