Abstract
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery is still a relatively new innovation in the field of gynecologic surgery. It was developed to overcome difficulties encountered with conventional laparoscopy and has been demonstrated to be just as safe as conventional laparoscopic surgery. Cited advantages of robotic technology over conventional laparoscopy include absence of tremor, three-dimensional image, superior instrument articulation, downscaling of movements, improved surgeon ergonomics, and faster operator learning curve (Obstet Gynecol 125:760–767, 2015). The main drawbacks are prolonged operating times and increase in operating cost (J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20(1):2–9, 2013; Sinha et al., Open J Obstet Gynecol 6:93–102, 2016). There are certain tubo-ovarian procedures that may benefit from the use of the robot, whereas use for other adnexal procedures may be considered excessive. Surgeons must be prudent in patient selection for utilization of robotic-assisted versus conventional approach to laparoscopy. In this chapter, we discuss indications for and describe certain scenarios for robotic-assisted tubo-ovarian surgery.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Robotic surgery in gynecology. Committee Opinion No. 628. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125:760–7.
AAGL position statement: robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in benign gynecology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(1):2–9.
Sinha R, Sanjay M, Bana R, Jeelani F, Kumari S. Robotic assisted surgery for endometriosis – “is the way forward?”. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;6:93–102. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2016.62011.
Nezhat FR. Sirota perioperative outcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopy surgery for advanced-stage endometriosis. JSLS. 2014;18(4). pii: e2014.00094. doi: https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2014.00094.
George K, Kamath MS, Tharyan P. Minimally invasive versus open surgery for reversal of tubal sterilization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(2). Art. No.: CD009174. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009174.pub2.
Boeckxstaens A, Devroey P, Collins J, Tournaye H. Getting pregnant after tubal sterilization: surgical reversal or IVF? Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2660.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stockwell, E. (2019). Robotic Tubo-Ovarian Surgery. In: Tsuda, S., Kudsi, O. (eds) Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96866-7_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96866-7_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96865-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96866-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)