Skip to main content

How Nurses Perceive Organizational Climate Surrounding Patient Handoffs in Japanese Hospitals?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (IEA 2018)

Abstract

The aims of the study were to extract organizational climate factors surrounding patient handoffs, and to capture their crucial characteristics in the current Japanese hospital context. A questionnaire survey was conducted between October and December 2017. A total of 5,117 valid responses were collected from nursing staff in 31 general hospitals with a response rate of 69%. The sample collected in 2011, which had 1,462 responses, was also used for comparison with the current data. Seven handoff factors were derived by applying principal component analysis to the 2017 sample with 44% of cumulative variance accounted for. Nursing staff perceived overall handoff adequacy and its elements moderately good. Significantly different views were observed between work units for all the factors. The most negative view was exhibited to information and responsibility continuity by respondents in ED. Regarding information transfer, compared with other intra-hospital handoff cases, information was transferred well in handoffs related to OR and ICU. There were also significant hospital differences in staff perceptions of patient handoff adequacy that the largest difference was identified in training and education. Comparing to six years ago, staff views became significantly more positive, and that the largest improvement was perceived for handoff process, training and education. Sufficiency of information transfer was also improved in the six-year interval. In conclusion, nursing staff perceptions of patient handoff practices and contributing factors have been improved in Japanese hospitals for the last six years, and currently viewed them moderately well. In addition, different views were extracted across work settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. British Medical Association (2005) Safe handover: safe patients. Guidance on clinical handover for clinicians and managers. https://www.bma.org.uk/-/media/Files/PDFs/Practical%20advice%20at%20work/Contracts/safe%20handover%20safe%20patients.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2018

  2. Lawrence S, Spencer LM, Sinnott M, Eley R (2015) It takes two to tango: Improving patient referrals from the emergency department to inpatient clinicians. Ochsner J 15(2):149–153

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gleicher Y, Mosko JD, McGhee I (2017) Improving cardiac operating room to intensive care unit handover using a standardised handover process. BMJ Open Qual 6(2):e000076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stelfox HT, Leigh JP, Dodek PM, Turgeon AF, Forster AJ, Lamontagne F, Fowler RA, Soo A, Bagshaw SM (2017) A multi-center prospective cohort study of patient transfers from the intensive care unit to the hospital ward. Intensive Care Med 43(10):1485–1494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Holly C, Poletick EB (2014) A systematic review on the transfer of information during nurse transitions in care. J Clin Nurs 23(17–18):2387–2395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson M, Sanchez P, Zheng C (2016) The impact of an integrated nursing handover system on nurses’ satisfaction and work practices. J Clin Nurs 25(1–2):257–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Robertson ER, Morgan L, Bird S, Catchpole K, McCulloch P (2014) Interventions employed to improve intrahospital handover: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf 23(7):600–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Riesenberg LA, Leitzsch J, Cunningham JM (2010) Nursing handoffs: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Nurs 110(4):24–34 quiz 35-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Manser T (2013) Fragmentation of patient safety research: a critical reflection of current human factors approaches to patient handover. J Public Health Res 2(3):e33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ekstedt M, Odegard S (2015) Exploring gaps in cancer care using a systems safety perspective. Cogn Technol Work 17(1):5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gu X, Andersen HB, Madsen MD, Itoh K, Siemsen IM (2012) Nurses’ views of patient handoffs in Japanese hospitals. J Nurs Care Qual 27(4):372–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (2006) Multivariate data analysis, 6th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reine E, Raeder J, Manser T, Smastuen MC, Rustoen T (2018) Quality in postoperative patient handover: different perceptions of quality between transferring and receiving nurses. J Nurs Care Qual. [Epub ahead of print]

    Google Scholar 

  15. Richter JP, McAlearney AS, Pennell ML (2016) The influence of organizational factors on patient safety: Examining successful handoffs in health care. Health Care Manag Rev 41(1):32–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. WHO Patient Safety Alliance (2007) Communication during patient hand-overs: Patient safety solutions, volume 1, solution 3. http://www.who.int/patientsafety/solutions/patientsafety/PS-Solution3.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2018

  17. Gu X, Seki T, Itoh T (2017) Developing an error taxonomy system for patient handoff events. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management - IEEM 2017, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  18. McElroy LM, Macapagal KR, Collins KM, Abecassis MM, Holl JL, Ladner DP, Gordon EJ (2015) Clinician perceptions of operating room to intensive care unit handoffs and implications for patient safety: a qualitative study. Am J Surg 210(4):629–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Andersen HB, Siemsen IMD, Petersen LF, Nielsen J, Ostergaard D (2015) Development and validation of a taxonomy of adverse handover events in hospital settings. Cogn Technol Work 17(1):79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Organization for Economic Cooperaion and Development (2017) Health at a glance 2017: OECD indicators. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/health-at-a-glance-2017_health_glance-2017-en#page1. Accessed 23 May 2018

  21. Horwitz LI, Meredith T, Schuur JD, Shah NR, Kulkarni RG, Jenq GY (2009) Dropping the baton: a qualitative analysis of failures during the transition from emergency department to inpatient care. Ann Emerg Med 53(6):701–710 e4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee SH, Phan PH, Dorman T, Weaver SJ, Pronovost PJ (2016) Handoffs, safety culture, and practices: evidence from the hospital survey on patient safety culture. BMC Health Serv Res 16:254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gu X, Liu H, Itoh K (2017) Patient handoff quality and safety in China: health care providers’ views. In: Cepin M, Briš R (eds) Proceedings of European safety and reliability conference - ESREL 2017, safety and reliability - theory and applications. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 1675–1682

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kruger J, Dunning D (1999) Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J Pers Soc Psychol 77(6):1121–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wears RL (2015) Standardisation and its discontents. Cogn Technol Work 17(1):89–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was in part supported by Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (No. 15K16291), Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. The authors thank to the risk management personnel of the hospitals and nurses who participated in the survey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiuzhu Gu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 1. Question Items in Section 1

Appendix 1. Question Items in Section 1

Q1 to Q26 are about handoffs between your department/ward and other departments/wards.

  1. Q1.

    Regarding problems discovered during patient handoffs, my department/ward always finds solutions and solves them together with other relevant departments/wards.

  2. Q2.

    My department/ward often has views different from others about what information is required for patient handoffs.

  3. Q3.

    Current information technology supports patient handoffs well.

  4. Q4.

    It is clear to me when responsibility for a patient is transferred.

  5. Q5.

    We always receive accurate and updated information in patient handoffs from other departments/wards.

  6. Q6.

    I know what role is expected of me in a patient handoff.

  7. Q7.

    In my department/ward, new staff members always receive formal training for patient handoffs.

  8. Q8.

    We have sufficient time to make an adequate patient handoff.

  9. Q9.

    In my department/ward, it is a common practice that staff read back information they received and ask questions regarding unclear parts to ensure that the information is correctly understood.

  10. Q10.

    In my department/ward, we are rarely interrupted during patient handoffs.

  11. Q11.

    In my department/ward, we sometimes talk about having received too little information in patient handoffs.

  12. Q12.

    My department/ward uses patient handoffs as an opportunity for junior staff to learn good clinical practice.

  13. Q13.

    In my department/ward, current procedures, guidelines, or instructions for patient handoffs need improvement.

  14. Q14.

    It is sometimes unclear who is responsible for a patient after a patient handoff.

  15. Q15.

    In my department/ward, patient safety has the highest priority for patient handoffs.

  16. Q16.

    In my hospital, the patient handoff process needs improvement.

  17. Q17.

    In patient handoffs, we always voice our own concerns and express our own opinions to share understanding with other handoff staff.

  18. Q18.

    In my hospital, patient handoffs could be performed more efficiently.

  19. Q19.

    We always inform our patients of their planned transfers to other departments/wards whenever they are capable of understanding this.

  20. Q20.

    In my department/ward, sometimes we are too busy to attend quickly to a newly received patient.

  21. Q21.

    In my department/ward, we always seek to obtain required information from patients themselves or their families.

  22. Q22.

    In my department/ward, we usually do not make timely follow-up and support for patient care after patient handoff.

  23. Q23.

    Sometimes, the staff conducting a handoff with me is inexperienced or less capable.

  24. Q24.

    In patient handoffs, it is a common practice that we discuss about communications with patients/families to understand their complaints.

  25. Q25.

    In my department/ward, sometimes we make deviations from procedures or guidelines of patient handoffs.

  26. Q26.

    Overall, patient handoffs between departments/wards are conducted well in my hospital.

Q27 to Q34 are about shift handoff

  1. Q27.

    In my department/ward, current procedures, guidelines, or instructions for shift handoffs need improvement.

  2. Q28.

    In my department/ward, we are rarely interrupted during a shift handoff.

  3. Q29.

    In my department/ward, we always receive accurate and adequate information about patients from departing nurses in shift handoffs

  4. Q30.

    In my department/ward, new staff members always receive formal training for shift handoffs.

  5. Q31.

    In my department/ward, we use written message for transferring important information in shift handoffs.

  6. Q32.

    In my department/ward, we have sufficient time to make an adequate shift handoff.

  7. Q33.

    In my department/ward, sometimes we make deviations from procedures or guidelines of shift handoffs.

  8. Q34.

    Overall, shift handoff is conducted well in my department/ward.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gu, X., Itoh, K. (2019). How Nurses Perceive Organizational Climate Surrounding Patient Handoffs in Japanese Hospitals?. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 819. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96089-0_59

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics