Abstract
Manual handling is a risk factor with high attributable fraction in lumbar pain, frequent injury among construction workers due to dynamic and complex tasks. The aim of this study was to establish the differences between the actual handled weight and the recommended weight limit (RWL) according to EC2 (Ergo Carga Construcción) evaluation method.
The study was an analytic and non-experimental cross-section carried out in 32 construction sites with a sample of 186 workers. The positions assessed were bricklayer, scaffolding assembler, carpenters, hand laborers, construction laborers (excavation laborer/safety carpenter) and ironworkers during weight handling tasks. The EC2 method is designed to assess Dynamic Asymmetrical Manual Handling Tasks (DAMHT) and as result, estimates the Recommended Weight Limit (RWL) per task.
Within the group 179 DAMHT were assessed. In the sample the actual handled weight was between 3 kg and 80 kg, with a median of 20 kg (ICR = 20 kg). Meanwhile the values of the RWL were between 1.8 kg y 28.7 kg, with a median of 7.31 kg (ICR = 3.37 kg). Generally, all positions handle weights above the RWL established by EC2. The analyzed sample has a difference of 10.98 kg (ICR 23.4), between the actual handled weight and the RWL. The exception are the construction laborers (excavation laborer/safety carpenter), who present a negative difference, while hand laborers (15.69 kg/ICR 25.84), bricklayer (15.17 kg/ICR 23.28) and ironworkers (10,7 kg/ICR 24,62 kg) presents the highest difference among the group.
Contrasting research data with limits allowed by Chilean Law (Law 20.949 – maximum limit of 25 kg), a 33% of the sample performs DAMHT above lawful limits. 5% handle weights above 50 kg with a maximum of 80 kg. Regarding the RWL 83.2% of the manual handling observed is above this limit, therefore they imply high physical workload, thus the intervention must be not only with a technical approach but with administrative and engineering actions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albers J, Estill C, MacDonald L (2005) Identification of ergonomics interventions used to reduce musculoskeletal loading for building installation tasks. Appl Ergon 36:4
Albers J, Estill CF (2007) Simple solutions: Ergonomics for construction workers, Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). NIOSH-Publications Dissemination, Cincinnati
Buchholz B, Paquet V, Punnet L et al (1996) PATH: a work sampling based approach to ergonomic job analysis for construction work path: a work sampling-based approach to ergonomic job analysis for construction and other non-repetitive work. Appl Ergon 27:177–187
Bryan D, Rafferty M, Toner P, Wright S (2017) Financialisation and labour in the Australian commercial construction industry. Econ. Labour Relat. Rev. 28(4):500–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304617739504
Cerda E (2006) Ergonomics in the construction sector: the EC2 method. Maastrich, Netherland
Cerda E (2013) Modelo Conceptual de Proceso de Evaluación de Factores Ergonómicos en Tareas con Manipulación Manual de Carga Dinámico Asimétrica en el Sector Construcción. Tesis Doctoral. http://tdx.cat/handle/10803/183/discover
Cerda E, Rodríguez C, Olivares G et al (2014) Revisión de proceso de evaluación y fórmula de cálculo de límite de peso recomendado en Método EC2 para la Evaluación en Tareas con Manipulación Manual de Carga Dinámico Asimetrica. ORP J 1:19–39
Chang FL, Sun YM, Chuang KH, Hsu DJ (2009) Work fatigue and physiological symptoms in different occupations of high-elevation construction workers. Appl Ergon 40:591–596
Debiase D, de Farias J, Madeira K, Longen W (2015) Análise do risco ergonômico lombar de trabalhadores da construção civil através do método NIOSH/Analysis of lumbar ergonomic risk of construction workers using the NIOSH method. Revista Produção Online 15(3):914–924. https://doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v15i3.1888
Dirección del trabajo (2014) Octava Encuesta Nacional de Condiciones Laborales. Gobierno de Chile. http://www.dt.gob.cl/documentacion/1612/articles-108317_recurso_1.pdf
Fang D, Jiang Z, Zhang M, Wang H (2015) An experimental method to study the effect of fatigue on construction workers’ safety performance. Saf Sci 73(C):80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.019
Hess JA, Mizner RL, Kincl L, Anton D (2012) Alternatives to lifting concrete masonry blocks onto rebar: biomechanical and perceptual evaluations. Ergonomics 55(10):1229–1242. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2012.703694
Lee T-H (2012) Effects of range and mode on lifting capability and lifting time. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 18(3):387–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2012.11076941
Leung MY, Chan IYS, Yu J (2012) Preventing construction worker injury incidents through the management of personal stress and organizational stressors. Accid Anal Prev 48:156–166
MINTRAB (2018) Guía técnica para la evaluación y control de riesgos asociados al manejo o manipulación manual de carga. Ministerio del Trabajo y Previsión Social. Gobierno de Chile. https://www.previsionsocial.gob.cl/sps/download/biblioteca/seguridad-y-salud-en-el-trabajo/guia-manejo-cargas/guia-tecnica-manejo-manual-de-carga.pdf
ISO (2014) PD ISO/TR 12295:2014 - Ergonomics. Application document for International Standards on manual handling (ISO 11228-1, ISO 11228-2 and ISO 11228-3) and evaluation of static working postures (ISO 11226)
Punnet L, Wegman D (2004) Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: the epidemiologic evidence and the debate. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 14(1):13–23
Ray PK, Parida R, Sarkar S (2015) Ergonomic analysis of construction jobs in India: a biomechanical modelling approach. Procedia Manuf 3:4606–4612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.542
Umer W, Antwi-Afari MF, Li H, Szeto GPY, Wong AYL (2018) The prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms in the construction industry: a systematic re-view and meta-analysis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 91(2):125–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-017-1273-4
Villagra M (2000) Evaluation of the physical workload of bricklayers during the execution of block walls. Revista de Ingeniería de Construcción 15(2):91–99. https://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/10083
Villumsen M, Holtermann A, Samani A, Madeleine P, Birk Jørgensen M (2016) Social support modifies association between forward bending of the trunk and low-back pain: Cross-sectional field study of blue-collar workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 42(2):125–134. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3549
Yi W, Chan A (2016) Health profile of construction workers in Hong Kong. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13(12). Número de artículo: 1232. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13121232
Acknowledgments
In memory of Professor Jorge Rodríguez, Rest in Peace.
Funding
This work was selected in the “Convocatoria de Proyectos de Investigación e Innovación en Prevención de Accidentes y Enfermedades Profesionales año 2016 de la Superintendencia de Seguridad Social” (Chile) and was funded with the resources of Social Security Law No. 16,744 of Industrial accidents and occupational diseases. This project was executed with funds provided by the Instituto de Seguridad del Trabajo - IST.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Giovanni, O., Victoria, V., Carolina, R., Eduardo, C. (2019). Difference of Actual Handled Weight and the Recommended Limit for Dynamic Asymmetrical Manual Handling Tasks in Chilean Construction Workers. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 820. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96083-8_74
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96083-8_74
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96082-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96083-8
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)