Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 824))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 147 Accesses

Abstract

Effective communication is critical to sociotechnical systems. Such systems may entail distributed authority and responsibility, and physical resources that are not collocated. This is certainly the case in crisis management. To improve communication during crisis management, researchers have tried to enhance the communication technology. However, communication problems persist even in the presence of robust technology. Several studies of communication have examined the consequences of the spatial distribution of operators working on the achievement of a common goal. Yet, few have researchers have investigated the effects of temporal distribution. Drawing on documentation of the Deepwater Horizon Accident in 2010, we select examples to reveal the temporal distribution of events that affect the availability of contextual information across a socio-technical system. We claim that temporal distance, like spatial distance, reduces global awareness and the opportunity to observe the incidental behaviour that renders activities mutually accessible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Quarantelli EL (1986) Disaster crisis management (Preliminary paper #113). Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lagadec P (1995) Le dirigeant et les crises. Administration, revue de l’administration territoriales de l’Etat, n° 166

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dautun C (2007) Contribution à l’étude des crises de grande ampleur : connaissance et aide à la décision pour la Sécurité Civile (Doctoral dissertation). Thèse pour obtenir le grade de docteur de l’Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Etienne

    Google Scholar 

  4. Van Cott HP, Kinkade RG (1972) Human engineering guide to equipment design. Revised edn. U.S. Government Printing Office, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  5. Endsley MR (1988) Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, vol. 32, no. 2. SAGE Publications, pp 97–101

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stanton NA, Salmon PM, Walker GH, Jenkins D (2009) Genotype and phenotype schemata and their role in distributed situation awareness in collaborative systems. Theoret Issues Ergon Sci 10(1):43–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220802045199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Salas E, Cooke NJ, Rosen MA (2008) On teams, teamwork, and team performance: discoveries and developments. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 50(3):540–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dourish P, Bellotti V (1992) Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In: Proceedings of the conference on computer-supported cooperative work, Toronto, pp 107–114

    Google Scholar 

  9. Monge P, Rothman L, Eisenberg E, Miller K, Kirste K (1985) The dynamics of organizational proximity. Manage Sci. 31(9):1129–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Van den Bulte C, Moenaert R (1998) The effects of R&D team co-location on communication patterns among R&D, marketing, and manufacturing. Manage Sci 44(11):S1–S18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Forsyth DR (1998) Methodological advances in the study of group dynamics. Group Dyn. Theory Res Pract 2(4):211–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Luff P, Heath C (2000) The collaborative production of computer commands in command and control. Int J Hum Comput Stud 52(4):669–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Scott SD, Cummings ML, Graeber DA, Nelson WT, Bolia RS (2006) Collaboration technology in military team operations: lessons learned from the corporate domain. In: CCRTS: command and control research and technology symposium, San Diego, CA, June 2006

    Google Scholar 

  14. Allen TJ (1977) Managing the flow of technology. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cramton C (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences in dispersed collaboration. Organ Sci 12(3):346–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Herbsleb JD, Mockus A, Finholt TA, Grinter RE (2000) Distance, dependencies, and delay in a global collaboration. In: Proceedings, ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work, Philadelphia, PA, 2–7 December pp 319–328

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kraut R, Galegher J, Egido C (1988) Tasks and relationships in scientific research collaborations. Hum Comput Interact 3:31–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zahn GL (1991) Face-to-face communication in an office setting: the effects of position, proximity, and exposure. Commun Res 18(6):737–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ernstsen J, Villanger D, Thomas H (2014) Situation awareness in disaster management: a study of a norwegian collaboration exercise. Universitetet i Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  20. Olson GM, Olson JS (2000) Distance matters. Hum Comput Interact 15:139–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Karsenty L (1999) Cooperative work and shared visual context: An empirical study of comprehension problems in side-by-side and remote help dialogues. Hum Comput Interact 14:283–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Franke J, Charoy F, El Khoury P (2010) Collaborative coordination of activities with temporal dependencies. In: 18th International conference on cooperative information systems (COOPIS’2010)/OnTheMove (OTM) conferences, October 2010, Crete

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liberman N, Sagristano M, Trope Y (2002) The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. J Exp Soc Psychol 38:523–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gilovich T, Kerr M, Medvec VH (1993) Effect of temporal perspective on subjective confidence. J Pers Soc Psychol 64:552–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nisan M (1972) Dimension of time in relation to choice behavior and achievement orientation. J Pers Soc Psychol 57:660–671

    Google Scholar 

  26. Liu S, Palen L (2009) Spatiotemporal mashups: a survey of current tools to inform next generation crisis support. In: Proceedings of the 2009 information systems for crisis response and management conference (ISCRAM 2009), Gothenberg, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  27. National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling (2011a), Report to the President. https://cybercemetery.unt.edu/archive/oilspill/20121211005728/http://www.oilspillcommission.gov/sites/default/files/documents/DEEPWATER_ReporttothePresident_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 9 Dec 2017)

  28. National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling (2011b) Chief counsel’s report. http://www.iadc.org/archived-2014-osc-report/documents/C21462-407_CCR_for_print_0.pdf. Accessed 9 Dec 2017)

  29. Timeline of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_Deepwater_Horizon_oil_spill. Last edited 2 Apr 2018

  30. Sharit J (2012) Human error and human reliability analysis. In: Salvendy G (ed) Handbood of human factors and ergonomics, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 734–800

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Perrow C (1984) Normal accidents: living with high risk technologies. Princeton University Press, Princeton. (Revised edition, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Reason JT (1990) Human error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang J, Norman D (1994) Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cogn Sci 18:87–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Valerie Shalin’s participation in this project is supported by NSF Grant 1520870, Srinivasan Parthasarathy Principal Investigator.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Béatrice Linot .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Linot, B., Dinet, J., Charoy, F., Shalin, V.L. (2019). Temporal Dispersion in Distributed Work. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 824. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96071-5_57

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics