Skip to main content

Revisiting the Sociotechnical Principles for System Design (Clegg, 2000)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (IEA 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 824))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we reflect upon and re-examine the impact of one of the most influential papers in recent years in the field of sociotechnical systems design (Clegg, 2000). In particular, we look at the influence the paper has had upon a diverse range of researchers (e.g., citation patterns, the extent to which the ideas in the paper have been taken up by disciplines outside of human factors/ergonomics); carry out an evaluation of the extent to which the STS principles have stood the test of time and areas where they may need to be modified in the light of new developments within systems ergonomics (e.g., complexity theory, cybernetics), technology (e.g., the internet of things, automation and robotics) and wider society (e.g., globalization, climate change). The paper concludes with a section covering the future of STS and potential ways in which the principles could be taken forward and modified in order to cope with new developments in human factors/ergonomics and elsewhere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Clegg CW (2000) Sociotechnical principles for system design. Appl Ergon 31:463–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wilson JR (2000) Fundamentals of ergonomics in theory and practice. Appl Ergon 31:557–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carayon P (2006) Human factors of complex sociotechnical systems. Appl Ergon 37:525–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eason KD (2007) Local sociotechnical systems development in the NHS national programme for information technology. J Inf Technol 22:257–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Trist EL, Bamforth KW (1951) Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal getting. Hum Relat 4:3–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cherns A (1976) The principles of sociotechnical design. Hum Relat 9:783–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cherns A (1976) The principles of sociotechnical design revisited. Hum Relat 9(3):153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Waterson PE, Clegg CW, Robinson M (2014) Trade-offs between reliability, validity and utility in the development of human factors methods. In: Broberg O, Fallentin N, Hasle P, Jensen PL, Kabel A, Larsen ME, Weller T (eds) Human factors in organizational design and management XI. IEA Press, Santa Monica

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thatcher A, Waterson PE, Todd A (2017) State of science: ergonomics and global issues. Ergonomics 61(2):197–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wall TD, Clegg CW (1981) A longitudinal field study of group work redesign. J Occup Behav 2:31–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Clegg CW (1983) Psychology of employee lateness, absence and turnover: a methodological critique and an empirical study. J Appl Psychol 68(1):88–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Waterson PE, Clegg CW, Axtell CM (1997) The dynamics of work organization, knowledge and technology during software development. Int J Hum Comput Stud 46:79–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Clegg CW (1984) The derivation of job designs. J Occup Behav 5:131–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Emery F (1993) The nine step model. In: Trist E, Murray H (eds) The social engagement of social sciences, vol II. The socio-technical perspective. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp 569–579

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mumford E (2000) A socio-technical approach to systems design. Requir Eng 5:125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Avison DE, Wood-Harper AT (1990) Multiview - an exploration in information system development. Alfred Waller, London

    Google Scholar 

  17. Waterson PE (2014) Health information technology and sociotechnical systems: a progress report on recent developments within the UK National Health Service (NHS). Appl Ergon Part A 2:150–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. King A, Crewe E (2013) The blunders of our governments. One World Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  19. Digital by design (2103) The Bolton alcohol relapse prevention project. The health foundation, London

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hoare A (2016) Factors affecting the move to an eSystems approach to remote care delivery. In: IEEE proceedings of DESE 2016 (developments in e-Systems engineering), Liverpool, September 2016

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Waterson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Waterson, P., Eason, K. (2019). Revisiting the Sociotechnical Principles for System Design (Clegg, 2000). In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 824. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96071-5_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics