Abstract
In the participatory design, an intermediary object is a hybrid object, as well as a modeling of our future desire and an instrument to mediate the design process among all the work teams. This article discusses and takes the design process as the object of analysis, and the use of conceptual principles as an intermediary object, based on the authors’ participation in the development of a new Sulphur Recovery Unit. One important point to be considered as a determining factor of functional mismatches in large industrial projects is the growing gap between operational and project teams, even when there is an expressed willingness to promote the participation of operators in the projects. The consequences of this are predominantly organizational, creating obstacles that must be overcome to make the operators’ integration into the project process more effective. Beginning from the conceptual project, the ergonomic design appears early, identifying the need to promote a social intervention together with the technical specifications, using one or more intermediary objects to organize and mediate the interactions between actors of the design process. This conceptual guidance creates a place where the solution to each design conflict should be discussed and resolved.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
BĂ©guin P (2012) When users and designers meet each other in the design process. In: Owen C, Wackers G, BĂ©guin P (eds) Risky work environments: reappraising human work within fallible systems. Ashgate Publishing, Farnham
Béguin P (2003) Design as a mutual learning process between users and designers. Interact Comput 15(5):709–730
Béguin P (2007) Taking activity into account during the design process. @ctivités 4(2):115–121. http://www.activites.org/v4n2/v4n2.pdf
Broberg O (2007) Integrating ergonomics into engineering: empirical evidence and implications for the ergonomists. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf 17(4):353–366
Bucciarelli LL (1994) Designing engineers. MIT Press, Cambridge
Bucciarelli LL (2003) Engineering philosophy. Delft University Press, Delft
Daniellou F (2005) The French-speaking ergonomists’ approach to work activity: cross-influences of field intervention and conceptual models. Theoret Issues Ergon Sci 6(5):409–427
Duarte F, Lima F, Remiro R, Maia N (2009) Settings of usage for the design process. In: Proceedings of the 17th world congress on ergonomics, Beijing, China
Lima FPA, Resende AE, Duarte FMC (2014) The social construction of design processes in complex organizations. In: Proceedings of human factors in organizational design and management – ODAM XI, vol 1. DTU Library, Copenhague, pp 919–924
Star SL, Griesemer J (1989) Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects. Soc Stud Sci 19(3):387–420
Star SL, Ruhleder K (1996) Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: design and access for large information spaces. Inf Syst Res 7(1):111–134
Theureau J (2003) Course-of-action analysis and course-of-action-centered design. In: Hollnagel E (ed) Handbook of cognitive task design. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 55–82
Vaughan D (1996) The challenger launch decision. Chicago UP, Chicago
Vinck D, Blanco E (eds) (2003) Everyday engineering: an ethnography of design and innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge
Trompette P, Vinck D (2009) Retour sur la notion d’objet-frontière. Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances 3(1):5–27. https://doi.org/10.3917/rac.006.0005
Trompette P, Vinck D (2010) Retour sur la notion d’objet-frontière (2) » Fécondité de la notion dans l’analyse écologique des objets innovants. Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances 4(1):11–15. https://doi.org/10.3917/rac.009.0011
Vinck D (2011) Taking intermediary objects and equipping work into account in the study of engineering practices. Eng Stud 3(1):25–44
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Resende, A.E., de P. A. Lima, F., Moura Duarte, F.J.C. (2019). Conceptual Principles as Intermediary Object: Case of an Industrial Unit. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 824. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96071-5_196
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96071-5_196
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96070-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96071-5
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)