Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 825))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3208 Accesses

Abstract

This paper investigates the effect of democracy on migration using a dynamic panel model. Our model controls for the network effects of migration and country fixed effects. We construct a binary measure of democracy indicating a precise transition of political regimes and reducing measurement error. The baseline results show that democracy can increase migration by 29% in the long-run. Using the waves of democratizations and reversals as instruments for democracy, we find comparable estimates. Our findings suggest that democracy can increase migration by permitting dual citizenship, allowing sending remittances, providing better health, improving human development and human capital.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Migration in this paper indicates in-migration, but not out-migration or return migration.

  2. 2.

    Freedom House define a political regime by assigning three scores: Free, partial free and no free. Generally, empirical papers construct dichotomous variable by putting 1 for democracy if it satisfies either free or partial free and otherwise 0. For example, Freedom House assigns “no free” in 1991 for Kuwait indicating non-democratic. However, in 1992 score from Freedom House is “partial free” for Kuwait which suggests that political regime is democratic, but it remains authoritarian. Thus, while measuring democracy by dichotomous variable using Freedom House index, it involves measurement error. On the other hand, from 1991 to 1992, polity 2 score rises from −9 to −7 for Kuwait which does not provide precise information of transition of political regimes.

  3. 3.

    Countries may vary from geographical or colonial or historical perspectives. So, countries with unobservable factors may affect our estimates.

  4. 4.

    Political right comprises of four sub-categories: electoral process, political pluralism, participation and functioning of government. Civil right constitutes of freedom of expression and belief, association and organization rights, rule of law, personal autonomy and individual rights. For details, see Freedom House (2017).

  5. 5.

    Polity2 variable relies on some criteria like executive power, executive selections and the freedom of elections. For details, see Munck (2002).

  6. 6.

    The democracy variable in CGV relies on dejure and defacto existence of political parties. On the contrary, in BMR a country is democratic if a majority of adults elect the executive through a popular election (Cheibub et al. 2010; Boix et al. 2012).

  7. 7.

    Past migration in host countries plays an important role to encourage migrants from their countries of origin as they signal host countries' migration policy, job market condition, social, economic and political advantages, culture and people, integration to mainstream society, racial impatience and other factors to family members, relatives, friends and communities.

  8. 8.

    Asymptotic Nickell bias results from the lack of strict exogeneity of the DFE model.

  9. 9.

    Democratic revolution in the MENA region began in Tunisia which spreads to Libya, Egypt, Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Morocco, Bahrain, Algeria, Iran, Lebanon, Jordan, Kuwait, Oman and Sudan. Because of the Arab Spring, Saudi Arab, Algeria, Kuwait and Jordon took steps to provide political and economic freedom to their people. In contrast, Arab Spring resulted in conflicts and civil wars in Syria, Iraq, Lybia and Yemen (Abbasi 2012).

  10. 10.

    In Fisher-type unit root test, H0: All panels contain unit root; H1: At least one panel is stationary.

  11. 11.

    The maximum lags we considered in our analysis is 4. To select preferred lags, we set the null and alternative hypotheses; H0: \( \delta_{l} \) = 0. H1: \( \delta_{l} \) ≠ 0. Using the t-statistics, we find that 2 is our preferred lag in our model.

  12. 12.

    In overidentification test, H0: All instruments are exogenous; H1: At least one instrument is endogenous.

  13. 13.

    GDP is the aggregate value of goods and services that are provided by all domestic producers of a country. GDP per capita is GDP divided by population and is expressed in 2010 US dollars. Employment is expressed as a ratio of employed to total working-age population in a country. Both of them are taken from the World Development Indicators.

  14. 14.

    New classical or Harris-Todaro model explains how economic development affects migration. They build a two-sector model where they show that people move from rural to urban region to have higher or expected higher incomes. See Harris and Todaro (1970), for detail.

  15. 15.

    Political stability and rule of law data are taken from the Worldwide Governance Indicators. The former variable is constructed to explain the perceptions of likelihood that a government can be destabilized or overthrown by unconstitutionally or domestic violence and terrorism. The rule of law variable measures the extent to which people can have confidence in and abide by the rules of society. These include perceptions of incidence of crime, the effectiveness and predictability of the judiciary and enforceability of contracts. Both political stability and rule of law are constructed by performance of governance which ranges approximately from −2.5 to 2.5 indicating weak to strong performances.

  16. 16.

    To check robustness our result, we use the democratic measure of Papaioannou and Siourounis (2008). Their dichotomous democracy covers from 1960 to 2005 while we extend it to 2015. PS in Table 5 stand for Papaioannou and Siourounis.

  17. 17.

    Human development index (HDI), a measure of human development, is the geometric mean of three normalized indices of health, education and income and is taken from the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Human capital index (HCI), based on years of schooling constructed by (Barro 2013), is taken from Penn World Table. This index indicates average schooling years in the total population over the age of 25.

References

  • Abbasi AM (2012) The Arab world: Democratization and Islamization? Int J World Peace 29(1):7–19

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Naidu S, Restrepo P (2017) Democracy does cause growth. J Polit Econ Forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ (1996) Determinants of economic growth: a cross-country empirical study. NBER working paper 5698, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ (2012) Convergence and modernization revisited. NBER working paper 18295, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ, Lee JW (2013) A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. J Dev Econ 104:184–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer TK, Epstein GS, Gang IN (2002) Herd effects or migration networks? The location choice of Mexican immigrants in the US. IZA discussion paper 551, IZA Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum MA, Lake DA (2003) The political economy of growth: democracy and human capital. Am J Polit Sci 47(2):333–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertocchi G, Strozzi C (2008) International migration and the role of institutions. Public Choice 137(1):81–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley T, Kudamatsu M (2006) Health and democracy. Am Econ Rev 96(2):313–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatter J (2011) Dual citizenship and theories of democracy. Citizensh Stud 15(6–7):769–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleahu A (2004) Romanian migration to Spain: motivation, networks and strategies. New Patterns of Labour Migration in Central and Eastern Europe. Public Policy Centre, Cluj-Napoca, Rumania

    Google Scholar 

  • Boix C, Miller M, Rosato S (2012) A complete data set of political regimes, 1800–2007. Comp Polit Stud 20(10):1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd M (1989) Family and personal networks in international migration: recent developments and new agendas. Int Migr Rev 23(3):638–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh M, Mulley S (2013) Fair and democratic migration policy: a principled framework for the UK. Institute for Public Policy Research, London, Briefing

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheibub JA, Gandhi J, Vreeland JR (2010) Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice 143(1–2):67–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dual Citizenship (2015) Dual citizenship countries. Report, Dualcitizenship.com. https://www.dualcitizenship.com/countries.html#. Accessed 24 May 2015

  • Research Directorate (2015) Refworld. Report, Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Canada. http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6a81120.html. Accessed 25 May 2015

  • Docquier F, Lodigiani E, Rapoport H, Schiff M (2016) Emigration and democracy. J Dev Econ 120:209–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doorenspleet R (2000) Reassessing the three waves of democratization. World Polit 52(3):384–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elrick T, Ciobanu O (2009) Migration networks and policy impacts: insights from Romanian-Spanish migrations. Global Netw 9(1):100–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escriba-Folch A, Meseguer C, Wright J (2015) Remittances and democratization. Int Stud Q 59(3):571–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faist T (2001) Dual citizenship as overlapping membership. Internationell migration och etniska relationer, Malmö högskola

    Google Scholar 

  • Faist T, Gerdes J (2008) Dual citizenship in age of mobility. Report, Transatlantic council on migration, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Franco A, Alvarez-Dardet C, Ruiz MT (2004) Effect of democracy on health: ecological study. Br Med J 329(7480):1421–1423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FreedomHouse: Methodology. Report, FreedomHouse, Washington, DC. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world-2010/methodology?page=351&anapage=363&year=2010. Accessed 24 June 2015

  • Gerring J, Thacker SC, Alfaro R (2012) Democracy and human development. J Polit 74(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris JR, Todaro MP (1970) Migration, unemployment and development: a two-sector analysis. Am Econ Rev 60(1):126–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiskey J, Montalvo JD, Orc´es D (2014) Democracy, governance, and emigration intentions in Latin America and The Caribbean. Stud Comp Int Dev 49(1):89–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington SP (1993) The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century. First edition, vol 4. University of Oklahoma Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline DS (2003) Push and pull factors in international nurse migration. J Nurs Sch 35(2):107–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotera G, Okada K (2017) How does democratization affect the composition of government expenditure? J Econ Behav Org 137:145–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurzman C (1998) Waves of democratization. Stud Comp Int Dev 33(1):42–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manby B (2016) Citizenship law in Africa a comparative study, 3rd edn. African Minds, Open Society Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansoor AM, Quillin B et al (2006) Migration and remittances: Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. World Bank Publications, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie D, Rapoport H (2007) Network effects and the dynamics of migration and inequality: theory and evidence from Mexico. J Dev Econ 84(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munck GL, Verkuilen J (2002) Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: evaluating alternative indices. Comp Polit Stud 35(1):5–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Papaioannou E, Siourounis G (2008) Democratisation and growth. Econ J 118(532):1520–1551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkins NC (2010) Push and pull factors of migration. Am Rev Polit Econ 8(2):6–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen PJ, Pytlikova M, Smith N (2008) Selection and network effects—migration flows into OECD countries 1990–2000. Eur Econ Rev 52(7):1160–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson T, Tabellini G (2006) Democratic capital: the nexus of political and economic change. NBER working paper 12175, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper N, Rother S (2015) Migration and democracy: citizenship and human rights from a multi-level perspective. Int Migr 53(3):3–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prabhu B (2015) Dual or multiple citizenship: which countries permit dual citizenship? Report, Corpocrat Magazine, Budapest, Hungary. https://corpocrat.com/2016/10/06/dualmultiple-citizenship-whichcountries-permit-dual-citizenship/. Accessed 20 June 2015

  • Solimano A (2009) Migration and democracy: issues for Latin America and Europe at a time of global recession. Technical report, IDEA, Stockholm, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark O, Helmenstein C, Prskawetz A (1997) A brain gain with a brain drain. Econ Lett 55(2):227–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonelli SJ (2003) Migration and democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. Transfer Eur Rev Labour Res 9(3):483–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacziarg R (2001) Human capital and democracy. Mimeographed document, Graduate School of Business, Standford University

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2017) World Development Indicators. Report, World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington, D.C. (2017). http://databank.worldbank.org/data//reports.aspx?source=2&country=&series=SH.DYN.MORT&period=. Accessed 24 May 2017

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kalam Azad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Azad, K., Atallah, G. (2019). Migration and Democracy. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 825. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96068-5_70

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics