Skip to main content

An Ergonomic Approach of IEQ Assessment: A Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (IEA 2018)

Abstract

Only in the last fifteen years, the application of the ergonomics principles stated the need to achieve a good IEQ (indoor environmental quality) as a result of thermal, visual, acoustic comfort and indoor air quality (IAQ). The awareness increased that an adequate design of the indoor environment, where people work and live, requires a synergic approach to all facets involved in full compliance with sustainability. IEQ strictly affects the overall building energy performances and exhibits an antagonistic relationship with respect to the energy saving requirements. In addition, the effects of low IEQ levels on the health and the productivity at work could even greater than those related to the energy costs of building facilities.

The role played by IEQ is very important especially in school environments. Particularly, children are extra sensitive to a poor indoor environment as they are physically still developing and, in comparison to healthy adults, will suffer the consequences of a poor indoor environment with also negative effects in learning ability. Because of all mentioned issues an integrated approach in the design and in the assessment of school buildings is required where ergonomics plays a crucial role.

Since more than 20 years InEQualitES (Indoor Environmental Quality and Energy Saving) team, made by researchers and professors from Universities of Salerno and Naples, has focused the research on the environmental quality in schools. The experience gained in the field allowed to build a large database of subjective and objective data and helped us to find effective solution aimed to solve most common problems related to the application of assessment methods.

Based upon this experience, this discussion will be mainly focused to the main criticalities related to the thermal comfort assessment in schools with special reference to the integration of objective investigations (referred to a mean subject statistically significant) and subjective investigations which are the only able to show possible differences (age, gender and so on) in experienced perception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ASHRAE (2016) Interactions Affecting the Achievement of Acceptable Indoor Environments - ASHRAE Guideline 10-2016, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  2. CEN (2007) Criteria for the Indoor Environment including thermal comfort indoor air quality, light and noise. EN Standard 15251. Comité Européen de Normalisation, Bruxelles

    Google Scholar 

  3. d’Ambrosio Alfano FR, Olesen BW, Palella BI, Riccio G (2014) Thermal comfort: design and assessment for energy saving. Energy Build 81:326–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bellia L, Boerstra A, van Dijken F, Ianniello E, Lopardo G, Minichiello F, et al (2010) Indoor environment and energy efficiency in schools part 1: principles. REHVA Guidebook 13

    Google Scholar 

  5. Teli D, Bourikas L, James PAB, Bahaj AS (2017) Thermal performance evaluation of school buildings using a children-based adaptive comfort model. Procedia Environ Sci 38:844–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. d’Ambrosio Alfano FR, Ianniello E, Palella BI (2013) PMV–PPD and acceptability in naturally ventilated schools. Build Environ 67:129–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. d’Ambrosio Alfano FR, Palella BI, Ranesi G, Riccio G: Parameters that affect PMV in schools. In: Heiselberg PK (Ed) CLIMA 2016 - Proceedings of the 12th REHVA World Congress, Aalborg, vol 10, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  8. ASHRAE (2017) Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fanger PO (1970) Thermal Comfort: Analysis and Applications in Environmental Engineering. Danish Technical Press, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang G, Zheng C, Yang W, Zhang Q, Moschandreas DJ (2007) Thermal comfort investigation of naturally ventilated classrooms in a subtropical region. Indoor Built Environ, 148–158

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brager GS, de Dear RJ (1998) Thermal adaptation in the built environment: a literature review. Energy Build 27:83–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fanger PO, Toftum J (2002) Extension of the PMV model to non-air-conditioned buildings in warm climates. Energy Build 34:533–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. ISO (1995) Ergonomics of the thermal environment e assessment of the influence of the thermal environment using subjective judgement scales. ISO Standard 10551. International Standardization Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sadat Zomorodian Z, Tahsildoost M, Hafezi M (2016) Thermal comfort in educational buildings: a review article. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 59:895–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Indraganti M, Daryani RK (2010) Effect of age, gender, economic group and tenure on thermal comfort: a field study in residential buildings in hot and dry climate with seasonalvariations. Energy Build 42(3):273–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Teli D, Jentsch MF, James PAB (2014) The role of a building’s thermal properties on pupils’ thermal comfort in junior school classrooms as determined in field studies. Energy Build 82:640–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. ISO (1998) Ergonomics of the thermal environment – instruments for measuring physical quantities. ISO Standard 7726. International Standardization Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  18. ISO (1998) Ergonomics of the thermal environment e determination of metabolic rate. ISO Standard 8996. International Standardization Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  19. ISO (2007) Ergonomics of the thermal environment and estimation of the thermal insulation and evaporative resistance of a clothing ensemble. ISO Standard 9920. International Standardization Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  20. ISO (2005) Ergonomics of the thermal environment - analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria. International Standardization Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  21. d’Ambrosio Alfano FR, Palella BI, Riccio G (2016) Notes on the calculation of the PMV index by means of apps. Energy Procedia 101:249–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. d’Ambrosio Alfano FR, Olesen BW, Palella BI (2017) Povl Ole Fanger’s impact ten years later. Energy Build 152:243–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Romana d’Ambrosio Alfano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Attaianese, E., d’Ambrosio Alfano, F.R., Palella, B.I. (2019). An Ergonomic Approach of IEQ Assessment: A Case Study. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 825. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96068-5_57

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics