Skip to main content

Development of Fuzzy Data Envelopment Risk Analysis Applied on Auditory Ergonomics for Call Center Agents in the Philippines

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (IEA 2018)

Abstract

Most contact center employees experience work related injuries, leading to decreased productivity and performance. The increased risk is due to poor workstation design, such as indecent noise level and duration exposure experienced by call center agents daily, while receiving and making calls on a headset or telephone. Some illnesses caused by prolonged exposure to unfavorable acoustics are headaches, increased anxiety levels, tinnitus, and noise-induced hearing loss. Mathematical modelling has only been applied in optimizing systems considering musculoskeletal disorders and only in other industries. Thus, it is important to consider the auditory ergonomic risks faced by call center agents mathematically. This study proposes Fuzzy Data Envelopment Risk Analysis (FDERA), a DEA-based risk analysis tool that considers the presence of imprecise data. The validity of the model is demonstrated using a case example. The results of the proposed tool are relative risk efficiency scores for each agent. Guidelines for interventions to improve risk efficiencies are presented using a matrix that provides possible preventive and corrective measures to address risks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Errighi, Khatiwada, Bodwell (2016) Business process outsourcing in the Philippines: Challenges for decent work. ILO Asia- Pacific Working Paper Series

    Google Scholar 

  2. Norman: Call centre work – characteristics, physical, and psychosocial exposure, and health related outcomes (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. OSHA (2000) Ergonomics: The Study of Work. https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3125.pdf

  4. Lan L, Wargocki P, Lian Z (2011) Quantitative measurement of productivity loss due to thermal discomfort. Energy Build 43(5):1057–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kurakata K, Mizunami T, Matsushita K (2007) Accessible design in auditory ergonomics, p 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tiesler G, Oberdoerster M (2008) Noise - a stress factor? acoustic ergonomics at schools. J Acoustical Soc Am 123(5):3918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Beyan A, Demiral Y, Cimrin A, Ergor A (2016) Call centers and noise-induced hearing loss. Noise Health 18(81):113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi G (2009) A goal programming mixed-model line balancing for processing time and physical workload. Comput Ind Eng 57(1):395–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xu Z (2010) Design of Assembly Lines with the Concurrent Consideration of Productivity and Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders using Linear Models (Master’s thesis)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mummolo G, Mossa G, Boenzi F, Digiesi S (2015) Productivity and ergonomic risk in human based production systems: a job-rotation scheduling model. Int J Prod Econ 171:471–477

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chang S, Chen T (2006) Discriminating relative workload level by data envelopment analysis. Int J Ind Ergon 36(9):773–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Azadeh A, Motevali Haghighi S, Gaeini Z, Shabanpour N (2016) Optimization of healthcare supply chain in context of macro-ergonomics factors by a unique mathematical programming approach. Appl. Ergon 55:46–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramanathan R (2001) Comparative risk assessment of energy supply technologies: a data envelopment analysis approach. Energy 26(2):197–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rougier J, Rougier J, Hill LJ, Sparks RS (2013) Risk and uncertainty assessment for natural hazards. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Azadeh A, Alem S (2010) A flexible deterministic, stochastic and fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis approach for supply chain risk and vendor selection problem: Simulation analysis. Expert Syst Appl 37(12):7438–7448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Project Management Institute Inc.: A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chapman C, Ward S (2004) Why risk efficiency is a key aspect of best practice projects. Int J Project Manag 22(8):619–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang H, Pollitt M (2009) Incorporating both undesirable outputs and uncontrollable variables into DEA: the performance of Chinese coal-fired power plants. Eur J Oper Res 197(3):1095–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Puri J, Yadav SP (2014) A fuzzy DEA model with undesirable fuzzy outputs and its application to the banking sector in India. Expert Syst Appl 41(14):6419–6432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Golmohammadi R, Eshaghi M, Khoram MR (2011) Fuzzy Logic Method for Assessment of Noise Exposure Risk in an Industrial Workplace 3(2):49–55

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pawlaczyk-Łuszczyńska M, Dudarewicz A, Zamojska-Daniszewska M, Rutkowska-Kaczmarek P, Zaborowski K (2017) Noise exposure and hearing threshold levels in call center operators. ICBEN

    Google Scholar 

  22. DisMark Tinnitus (2017) Tinnitus hearing-test - Sound therapy helps against tinnitus, ringing in the ears. http://www.tinnitool.com/en/tinnitus_analyse/hoertest.php. Accessed 2017/12/11

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jayne Lois San Juan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Appendix A. Translated Triangular Fuzzy Numbers

Low/Mid/High

DMU

Noise Level

Noise Duration

Anxiety Level

Tinnitus

Performance

1

65/70/75

2/4/6

0.55/1.625/3

0.03

0.85/0.9/0.95

2

90/95/100

1/2/3

0.1/0.42/0.9

0.53

0.72/0.79/0.85

3

65/70/75

1/2/3

1.2/2.5/4.2

0.01

0.9/0.95/1

4

80/85/90

2/4/6

0.86/2.325/4

0.25

0.72/0.79/0.85

5

72/78.5/85

5/6.5/8

1.65/3.25/5.25

0.05

0.8/0.85/0.9

6

65/70/75

2/4/6

0.7/1.2/1.8

0.01

0.86/0.9/0.95

7

90/95/100

2/4/6

4.2/6.4/9

0.64

0.1/0.43/0.75

8

85/90/95

1/2/3

1.65/3.25/5.25

0.08

0.8/0.85/0.9

9

65/70/75

5/6.5/8

0.1/0.42/0.9

0.03

0.9/0.95/1

10

80/85/90

5/6.5/8

5.167.44/10

0.15

0.72/0.79/0.85

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Go, E.M., Ong, K.B., Juan, J.L.S., Sia, W.G., Tiu, R.H., Li, R. (2019). Development of Fuzzy Data Envelopment Risk Analysis Applied on Auditory Ergonomics for Call Center Agents in the Philippines. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 827. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96059-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics