Abstract
In the last two decades, with the widespread of Internet and global communication, the creation of the World Trade Organization and the liberalization of world trade, and the re-launch of neoliberalism, a lot of changes occurred in the economic and social order that still persist today.
However, this (r)evolution are not satisfactorily followed by all, with obvious costs in social and territorial cohesion. That is why the education system may be a way to provide a more adequate and beneficial convergence between this framework of changes, new demands and the universe of values, knowledge and skills held by citizens.
This resulted, in Portugal, in a process of decentralization of education competences from national to local authorities, which aims to promote quality and efficiency in the use of educational resources and to reinforce educational processes.
This model implies a better relationship between local actors, as they constitute a fundamental part of the local education system and are the main motivators of change. The local education system can therefore work as a tool to stimulate entrepreneurship and support the dynamics of structural change in the social and economic dimensions.
The process that intends to materialize this concept of education system was tested in the municipality of Cascais with the elaboration of a Municipal Educational Strategic Plan (PEEM). The methodological process applied in this PEEM that is revisited in this chapter as a way of illustrating an example of transforming a local education system through the involvement of the local actors led by the municipality.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Ministério da Educação—MNE.
- 2.
Carta Educativa—CE.
References
Afonso, A. (2008). PolÃticas Educativas Contemporâneas: Dilemas e desafios. In N. F. Cunha (Ed.), Pedagogia e Educação em Portugal, Séculos XX e XXI (pp. 61–80). Vila Nova de Famalicão: CMVNF.
Brown, C. A. (2015). The need to give voice to local scholars in educational policy. In Globalization, international education policy and local policy formation (pp. 1–6). Dortrecht: Springer.
Burns, T., & Cerna, L. (2016). Enhancing effective education governance. Educational Research and Innovation, 221–233.
Burns, T., & Köster, F. (2016). Modern governance challenges in education. Educational Research and Innovation, 17–39.
Cuéllar-Marchelli, H. (2003). Decentralization and privatization of education in El Salvador: Assessing the experience. International Journal of Educational Development, 23(2), 145–166.
Fiske, E. (1996). Decentralization of education: Politics and consensus. Washington, DC: World Bank.
IIEP-UNESCO. (2010). Strategic planning: Techniques and methods. Education sector planning, Working paper 3. Paris: IIEP-UNESCO.
Jeong, D. W., Lee, H. J., & Cho, S. K. (2017). Education decentralization, school resources, and student outcomes in Korea. International Journal of Educational Development, 53, 12–27.
Ļaudams, V. (2014). How actors of local society (community) influence the development of decentralized general education, and their attitude to it. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 140, 570–575.
McMillan, M. S., & Rodrik, D. (2011). Globalization, structural change and productivity growth (No. w17143). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Moberg, K. (2014). Two approaches to entrepreneurship education: The different effects of education for and through entrepreneurship at the lower secondary level. The International Journal of Management Education, 12(3), 512–528.
Parry, T. R. (1997). Achieving balance in decentralization: A case study of education decentralization in Chile. World Development, 25(2), 211–225.
Psacharopoulos, G., & Woodhall, M. (1993). Education for development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Qi, T. (2011). Moving toward decentralization? Changing education governance in China after 1985. In T. Huang & A. W. Wiseman (Eds.), The impact and transformation of education policy in China (International Perspectives on Education and Society) (Vol. 15, pp. 19–41). Bingley: Emerald Group.
Rezende, A. J., Slomski, V., & Corrar, L. J. (2005). A gestão pública municipal e a eficiência dos gastos públicos: uma investigação empÃrica entre as polÃticas públicas e o Ãndice de desenvolvimento humano (IDH) dos municÃpios do Estado de São Paulo. Revista Universo Contábil, 1(1), 24–40.
Rondinelli, D., & Nellis, J. (1986). Assessing decentralization policies in developing countries: The case for cautious optimism. Development Policy Review, 4(1), 3–23.
Rondinelli, D., McCullough, J. S., & Johnson, R. W. (1989). Analysing decentralization policies in developing countries: A political-economy framework. Development and Change, 20, 57–87.
Santos, L., Cordeiro, A. M. R., & Alcoforado, L. (2016). Planeamento de recursos educativos em Portugal ao longo dos últimos 80 anos. Revista Educação e Emancipação, 9(2), 13–35.
Saviotti, P. P., Pyka, A., & Junca, B. (2016). Education, structural change and economic development. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 38, 55–68.
Skeland, G., & Filmer, D. (2007, March). Autonomy, participation and learning: Findings from argentine schools, and implications for decentralization. Education Economics, 15(1), 103–127.
Stromquist, N. P., & Monkman, K. (2014). Defining globalization and assessing its implications for knowledge and education, revisited. Globalization and education: Integration and contestation across cultures, 1.
Toutain, O., & Mueller, S. (2015). The outward looking school and its ecosystem. Entrepreneurship 360, OECD.
United Nations Development Programme. (2017). Human development report 2016 human development for everyone. New York: UNDP.
Veiga, I. P. A. (2003). Inovações e projeto polÃtico-pedagógico: uma relação regulatória ou emancipatória? Cadernos Cedes.
Wals, A. E. (2012). Shaping the education of tomorrow: 2012 full-length report on the UN decade of education for sustainable development. Paris: Unesco.
Winkler, D. (1989). Decentralization in education. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gonçalves, J., Guerreiro, C. (2019). The Local Education System as a Pillar for Structural Change: The Case of the Strategic Educational Plan of Cascais, Portugal. In: Cagica Carvalho, L., Rego, C., Lucas, M.R., Sánchez-Hernández, M.I., Backx Noronha Viana, A. (eds) New Paths of Entrepreneurship Development. Studies on Entrepreneurship, Structural Change and Industrial Dynamics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96032-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96032-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96031-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96032-6
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)