Skip to main content

Social Footprint. An Exploratory Analysis of Existing Evidence and Opportunities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Design for Inclusion (AHFE 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 776))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1712 Accesses

Abstract

The design of products, systems, and services not often is driven to be socially innovative. One of the reasons could be that especially in the private sector, the impact of a Design for All approach it is not easy to assess. Nevertheless, many companies produce goods and services whose outcome goes beyond the mere consumption or experience level. Specifically, there is evidence that in different sectors (from design to food, from fashion to wellness) the level of consumer engagement is changing. In particular, it is expected that final users will experience an improvement in the quality of their lives in a more sustainable and nature-friendly way. This has often be referred to as social footprint or social impact. However, while a clear-cut measure of the environmental effects exists, that is the carbon footprint, the same cannot be said for the social footprint. Researchers and private organizations are discussing possible ways to measure it, and some have been implemented, but a general agreement on a unique definition has not been reached yet. When available, it is also unclear what it is the extent of its applications. The goal of this paper is to offer a detailed review and analysis of what it is known so far and to be able to propose a different point of view which moves from CSR and CSM to the possibility of evaluating the economical growth and success of enterprises developed from Design Driven Social Innovation. We intend to use the study to design a set of questions to be able to then interview some key experts in the area (mainly social entrepreneurs) to understand if there is a shared interpretation of the concept of the social footprint and how Design for All is being implemented, why and with which results. We also want to understand which are the key categories that could be transformed into measurable information. The study should be seen as a basis for the next steps, which are, respectively, the building of a social footprint indicator for businesses which have integrated society into strategy and its applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Definition of corporate social responsibility, Financial Times Lexicon, available at http://lexicon.ft.com/Term?term=corporate-social-responsibility--(CSR).

  2. 2.

    Source: https://www.xerox.com/corporate-citizenship/2014/communityinvolvement/volunteer-programs/enus.html.

  3. 3.

    Brad, former lieutenant, lost his sight in Afghanistan. Determined to pursue an active life, Brad won two gold medals in swimming at the Paralympic Games in London in 2012, only one year after the terrible accident: an inspiration for visually impaired people.

References

  1. McElroy, M.W., Jorna, R.J., van Engelen, J.: Sustainability quotients and the social footprint. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 15, 223–234 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Galli, A., Wiedmann, T., Ercin, E., Knoblauch, D., Ewing, B., Giljum, S.: Integrating ecological, carbon and water footprint into a “footprint family” of indicators: definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet. Ecol. Indic. 16, 100–112 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Google: Google 2017 Environmental Report (2017). https://environment.google/

  4. Dahlsrud, A.: How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 15, 1–13 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Crane, A., Henriques, I., Husted, B.W., Matten, D.: Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility and Impact: Enhancing Quantitative Research Design and Methods in Business and Society Research (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McGuire, J.B., Sundgren, A., Schneeweis, T.: Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Acad. Manage. J. 31, 854–872 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aupperle, K.E., Carroll, A.B., Hatfield, J.D.: An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Acad. Manage. J. 28, 446–463 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Parket, I.R., Eilbirt, H.: The practice of business social responsibility: the underlying factors. Bus. Horiz. 18, 5–10 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lins, K.V., Servaes, H., Tamayo, A.: Social capital, trust, and firm performance: the value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. J. Finance. 72, 1785–1824 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kasriel-Alexander, D.: Top 10 global consumer trends for 2016. Euromonitor International (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Global Impact Investing Network: the business value of impact measurement (2016). https://thegiin.org/assets/GIIN_ImpactMeasurementReport_webfile.pdf

  12. LexMundi ProBono Foundation: Forms of Organization Overwiew. Steptoe & Johnson LLP (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. McWilliam, E.: “Pulse of Impact Management” Report Released on Impact Measurement, Management and Reporting Practices (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R.: Creating Shared Value How to Reinvent Capitalism—and Unleash a Wave of Innovation and Growth. Harvard Business Review (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R.: Strategy & Society. The link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brown, T.: Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. HarperCollins Publishers Inc., United States (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Donald A.N., Verganti R.: Incremental and radical innovation: design research vs. technology and meaning change. Design Issues J., 78–96 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Taleb, N.N.: Antifragile: Things that Gain from Disorder. Random House (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Accolla, A.: Design for all. Il progetto per l’individuo reale. Franco Angeli, Milano (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bandini Buti, L.: Ergonomia olistica. Franco Angeli, Milano (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avril Accolla .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Accolla, A., Hansstein, F. (2019). Social Footprint. An Exploratory Analysis of Existing Evidence and Opportunities. In: Di Bucchianico, G. (eds) Advances in Design for Inclusion. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 776. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94622-1_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94622-1_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94621-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94622-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics