Skip to main content

HELP? Attitudes Towards Care and Assistive Technologies from the Perspective of People with Disabilities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computers Helping People with Special Needs (ICCHP 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10897))

Abstract

Increasing care needs represent major challenges for today’s care sectors. Developing assistive technologies such as Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) systems pose a potential approach to face these challenges by relieving care staff or facilitating everyday life, e.g., for people with disabilities. Thereby, acceptance is essential for a sustainable adoption of assistive technologies in real life. So far, research has focused on technology-related as well as demographic factors and persons’ attitudes (e.g., technical self-efficacy) impacting technology acceptance. In contrast, individual attitudes towards the own situation - in particular individual attitudes towards care – have not been considered as potential influencing factors on the acceptance of assistive technologies. In order to create an appropriate measuring instrument for attitudes towards care, two empirical studies were carried out: In an online survey study (n = 34) persons’ attitudes towards the own care situation and their relationships to attitudes towards usage of assistive technologies were studied out of the perspective of people with disabilities. The exploratory confirmed instrument “attitudes towards care” was related with acceptance and perception of assistive technologies focusing on people of different ages with physical disabilities. Results of the second study (n = 64) verified these relationships focusing on elderly people in need of care. This suggests that attitudes towards care are acceptance-relevant for diverse groups of people. The results can be used to investigate relationships between individual perceptions of care and (assistive) technology acceptance in detail and to refine and adapt the attitude towards care instrument for diverse user groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bloom, D.E., Canning, D.: Global Demographic Change: Dimensions and Economic Significance. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper No. 10817 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Walker, A., Maltby, T.: Active ageing: a strategic policy solution to demographic ageing in the European Union. Int. J. Soc. Welf. 21, 117–130 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Geenen, S.J., Powers, L.E., Sells, W.: Understanding the role of health care providers during the transition of adolescents with disabilities and special health care needs. J. Adolesc. Health 32(3), 225–233 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wiles, J.L., Leibing, A., Guberman, N., Reeve, J., Allen, R.E.S.: The Meaning of “Ageing in Place” to Older People. The Gerontologist, gnr098 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. van Heek, J., Himmel, S., Ziefle, M.: Helpful but Spooky? Acceptance of AAL-systems contrasting user groups with focus on disabilities and care needs. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on ICT for Aging well (ICT4AWE 2017). SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng, J., Chen, X., Shen, M.: A framework for daily activity monitoring and fall detection based on surface electromyography and accelerometer signals. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 17(1), 38–45 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baig, M.M., Gholamhosseini, H.: Smart health monitoring systems: an overview of design and modeling. J. Med. Syst. 37(2), 1–14 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rashidi, P., Mihailidis, A.: A survey on ambient-assisted living tools for older adults. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 17(3), 579–590 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fuchsberger, V.: Ambient assisted living: elderly people’s needs and how to face them. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Semantic Ambient Media Experiences, pp. 21–24. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Demiris, G., Hensel, B.K., Skubic, M., Rantz, M.: Senior residents’ perceived need of and preferences for “smart home” sensor technologies. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 24(1), 120–124 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilkowska, W., Gaul, S., Ziefle, M.: A small but significant difference – the role of gender on acceptance of medical assistive technologies. In: Leitner, G., Hitz, M., Holzinger, A. (eds.) USAB 2010. LNCS, vol. 6389, pp. 82–100. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16607-5_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Kadijevich, D.M., Odovic, G., Maslikovic, D.: Using ICT and quality of life: comparing persons with and without disabilities. In: Miesenberger, K., Bühler, C., Penaz, P. (eds.) ICCHP 2016. LNCS, vol. 9758, pp. 129–133. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41264-1_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Holman, H., Lorig, K.: Patient self-management: a key to effectiveness and efficiency in care of chronic disease. Publ. Health Rep. 119(3), 239–243 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bleustein, C., Rothschild, D.B., Valen, A., Valatis, E., Schweitzer, L., Jones, R.: Wait times, patient satisfaction scores, and the perception of care. Am. J. Manag. Care 20(5), 393–400 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tsai, T.C., Orav, E.J., Jha, A.K.: Patient satisfaction and quality of surgical care in US hospitals. Ann. Surg. 261(1), 2 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Findler, L., Vilchinsky, N., Werner, S.: The multidimensional attitudes scale toward persons with disabilities (MAS) construction and validation. Rehabil. Couns. Bull. 50(3), 166–176 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Terrill, A.L., Molton, I.R., Ehde, D.M., Amtmann, D., Bombardier, C.H., Smith, A.E., Jensen, M.P.: Resilience, age, and perceived symptoms in persons with long-term physical disabilities. J. Health Psychol. 21(5), 640–649 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Power, M.J., Green, A.M.: The attitudes to disability scale (ADS): development and psychometric properties. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 54, 860–874 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Offermann-van Heek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Offermann-van Heek, J., Ziefle, M. (2018). HELP? Attitudes Towards Care and Assistive Technologies from the Perspective of People with Disabilities. In: Miesenberger, K., Kouroupetroglou, G. (eds) Computers Helping People with Special Needs. ICCHP 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10897. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94274-2_79

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94274-2_79

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94273-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94274-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics