Skip to main content

A Quality-Validation Task Assignment Mechanism in Mobile Crowdsensing Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Wireless Algorithms, Systems, and Applications (WASA 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10874))

Abstract

Participant selection or task allocation is a key issue in Mobile Crowdsensing (MCS) systems. Previous participant assignment approaches mainly focus on selecting a proper subset of users for MCS tasks, but however how to ensure that users devote effort on their tasks is a challenging problem that arises in these approaches. This paper studies the task quality control issue, and proposes a quality-validation task assignment mechanism (QTAM) in MCS systems. We theoretically model this mechanism as a Stackelberg Game, in which the users’ instinct of maximizing their payoff and the validation workforce limitation are taken into account. An efficient approximation algorithm is designed to find a Strong Stackelberg Equilibrium (SSE) in the QTAM game. Extensive simulations demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of QTAM, which shows that QTAM can prevent untrustworthy behaviors and achieve optimal quality validation for sensing tasks.

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61672148, 61502092), the Ministry of Education - China Mobile Research Fund (MCM20160201), and the Hundred, Thousand and Ten Thousand Talents Project of Liaoning Province (201514).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guo, B., Wang, Z., Yu, Z., et al.: Mobile crowd sensing and computing: the review of an emerging human-powered sensing paradigm. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 48(1), 7 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zheng, Z., Wu, F., Gao, X., et al.: A budget feasible incentive mechanism for weighted coverage maximization in mobile crowdsensing. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 16(9), 2392–2407 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Peng, D., Wu, F., Chen, G.: Pay as how well you do: a quality based incentive mechanism for crowdsensing. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing, pp. 177–186. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Huang, K.L., Kanhere, S.S., Hu, W.: Are you contributing trustworthy data?: The case for a reputation system in participatory sensing. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems, pp. 14–22. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kang, Y., Miao, X., Liu, K., et al.: Quality-aware online task assignment in mobile crowdsourcing. In: 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems, MASS, pp. 127–135. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pouryazdan, M., Kantarci, B., Soyata, T., et al.: Anchor-assisted and vote-based trustworthiness assurance in smart city crowdsensing. IEEE Access 4, 529–541 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, X., Xue, G., Yu, R., et al.: Keep your promise: mechanism design against free-riding and false-reporting in crowdsourcing. IEEE Internet Things J. 2(6), 562–572 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kiekintveld, C., Jain, M., Tsai, J., et al.: Computing optimal randomized resource allocations for massive security games. In: Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems-Volume 1, pp. 689–696. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jain, V., Grossmann, I.E.: Algorithms for hybrid MILP/CP models for a class of optimization problems. INFORMS J. Comput. 13(4), 258–276 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruiyun Yu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Xia, X., Xue, L., Li, J., Yu, R. (2018). A Quality-Validation Task Assignment Mechanism in Mobile Crowdsensing Systems. In: Chellappan, S., Cheng, W., Li, W. (eds) Wireless Algorithms, Systems, and Applications. WASA 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10874. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94268-1_68

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94268-1_68

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94267-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94268-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics