Skip to main content

Coping with Incarceration: The Emerging Case for the Utility of Peer-Support Programmes in Prison

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mental Health in Prisons

Abstract

Although peer-support programmes have a long history in UK prisons, only recently have they garnered attention from researchers wishing to explore their potential utility. Such programmes are built upon principles of mutual reciprocity, empathy, and emotional support. Growing research on these programmes suggests a number of ways in which they can help prisoners maintain positive mental health, and can help the providers of support as much as the recipients. Upholding a supportive role enables prisoners to develop meaning and purpose, garners a sense of control over their own problems, and in turn contributes to a heightened sense of well-being. This chapter discusses some of the emerging research relating to the potential impact of peer-support schemes in prisons. It provides a consolidated review of the potential application and trajectory of such schemes throughout the prison estate. A theoretical foundation on which this application might be based is offered. This chapter highlights some of the ways in which peer-support schemes can assist the prison system in addressing the issues related to mental health and well-being that most prisoners will face whilst serving time. Implications regarding this type of provision in terms of the efficacy of imprisonment and life beyond the gates are explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Aresti, A., Eatough, V., & Brooks-Gordon, B. (2010). Doing time after time: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of reformed ex-prisoners’ experiences of self-change, identity and career opportunities. Psychology, Crime & Law, 16(3), 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beech, A., Friendship, C., Erikson, M., & Hanson, R. K. (2002). The relationship between static and dynamic risk factors and reconviction in a sample of UK child abusers. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14(2), 155–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beijersbergen, K. A., Dirkzwager, A. J., Eichelsheim, V. I., Laan, P. H., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2014). Procedural justice and prisoners’ mental health problems: A longitudinal study. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 24(2), 100–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blagden, N., & Perrin, C. (2016). ‘Relax lads, you’re in safe hands here’: Experiences of a sexual offender treatment prison. In C. Reeves (Ed.), Experiencing imprisonment: Research on the experience of living and working in carceral institutions (pp. 27–45). UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blagden, N., Perrin, C., Smith, S., Gleeson, F., & Gillies, L. (2017). “A different world”: Exploring and understanding the climate of a recently re-rolled sexual offender prison. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 23(2), 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boothby, M. R. (2011). Insiders’ views of their role: Toward their training. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 53(4), 424–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. M., Consedine, N. S., & Magai, C. (2005). Altruism relates to health in an ethnically diverse sample of older adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60(3), P143–P152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpentier, C., Royuela, L., Noor, A., & Hedrich, D. (2012). Ten years of monitoring illicit drug use in prison populations in Europe: Issues and challenges. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 51(1), 37–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellano, T. C., & Soderstrom, I. R. (1997). Self-esteem, depression, and anxiety evidenced by a prison inmate sample: Interrelationships and consequences for prison programming. The Prison Journal, 77(3), 259–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cid, J. (2009). Is imprisonment criminogenic? A comparative study of recidivism rates between prison and suspended prison sanctions. European Journal of Criminology, 6(6), 459–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, S. (2016). Unlocking potential: A review of education in prison. Ministry of Justice. Available at: http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/26435/1/education-review-report.pdf. Accessed 8 July 2016.

  • Crewe, B. (2007). Power, adaptation and resistance in a late-modern men’s prison. British Journal of Criminology, 47(2), 256–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, B. (2011). Depth, weight, tightness: Revisiting the pains of imprisonment. Punishment & Society, 13(5), 509–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. T., Jonson, C. L., & Nagin, D. S. (2011). Prisons do not reduce recidivism: The high cost of ignoring science. The Prison Journal, 91(3 suppl), 48S–65S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denborough, D. (Ed.). (1996). Beyond the prison: Gathering dreams of freedom. Adelaide: Dulwich Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denborough, D. (2002). Prisons and the question of forgiveness. The International Journal of Narrative Therapy and Community Work, 1, 75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, C. L. (2003). Peer support within a health care context: A concept analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 40(3), 321–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devilly, G. J., Sorbello, L., Eccleston, L., & Ward, T. (2005). Prison-based peer-education schemes. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(2), 219–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhami, M. K., Ayton, P., & Loewenstein, G. (2007). Adaptation to imprisonment: Indigenous or imported? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(8), 1085–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duggleby, W. (2016). Fostering hope in incarcerated older adults. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 43(9), 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, M. H. (2010). Deprivation, importation, and prison suicide: Combined effects of institutional conditions and inmate composition. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(4), 796–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgar, K., Jacobson, J., & Biggar, K. (2011). Time well spent: A practical guide to active citizenship and volunteering in prison. Prison Reform Trust. Available at: www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk/Portals/0/Documents/Time%20Well%20Spent%20report%20lo.pdf. Accessed 21 July 2017.

  • Fazel, S., & Danesh, J. (2002). Serious mental disorder in 23,000 prisoners: A systematic review of 62 surveys. The Lancet, 359(9306), 545–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fichtler, H., Zimmermann, R. R., & Moore, R. T. (1973). Comparison of self-esteem of prison and non-prison groups. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 36(1), 39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleisher, M. S., & Decker, S. H. (2001). An overview of the challenge of prison gangs. Corrections Management Quarterly, 5, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J., & Magee, H. (2011). Peer support in prison health care: An investigation into the Listener Scheme in one adult male prison. Samaritans. Available at: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/7767/1/helenDraft_Listener_report_27_091_doc-finalversion2.pdf. Accessed 12 July 2017.

  • Gartner, A. J., & Riessman, F. (1982). Self-help and mental health. Psychiatric Services, 33(8), 631–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendreau, P., Listwan, S. J., Kuhns, J. B., & Exum, M. L. (2014). Making prisoners accountable: Are contingency Management programs the answer? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(9), 1079–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta‐analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works! Criminology, 34(4), 575–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, M. (2007). Prison gang policy and recidivism: Short-term management benefits, long-term consequences. Criminology & Public Policy, 6(2), 223–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. (2007). Beyond the banality of evil: Three dynamics of an interactionist social psychology of tyranny. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), 615–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F. (2011). Institutions as enablers of wellbeing: The Singapore prison case study. International Journal of Wellbeing, 1(2), 255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, T. (2008). The “inside” story: Practitioner perspectives on teaching in prison. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 47(5), 512–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, M. (2011). A Listener lives here: The development of Samaritans’ prison listener scheme. Samaritans. Available at: http://www.samaritans.org/pdf/listener_scheme_12pp_web.pdf. Accessed 23 Nov 2017.

  • Johnson, R., & McGunigall-Smith, S. (2008). Life without parole, America’s other death penalty: Notes on life under sentence of death by incarceration. The Prison Journal, 88(2), 328–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerley, K. R., & Copes, H. (2009). “Keepin’ my mind right”: Identity maintenance and religious social support in the prison context. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53(2), 228–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, A., & Arnold, H. (2004). Prisons and their moral performance: A study of values, quality and prison life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lochner, L. (2004). Education, work, and crime: A human capital approach. International Economic Review, 45(3), 811–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losel, F. (2007). The prison overcrowding crisis and some constructive perspectives for crime policy. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 512–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maitland, A. S., & Sluder, R. D. (1998). Victimization and youthful prison inmates: An empirical analysis. The Prison Journal, 78(1), 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, T., & McNeill, F. (2008). Desistance-focused approaches. In S. Green, E. Lancaster, & S. Feasy (Eds.), Addressing offending behaviour: Context, practice and values (pp. 154–171). Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, F. (2006). A desistance paradigm for offender management. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 6(1), 39–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, S., Hilton, D., & Curtis, L. (2001). Peer support: A theoretical perspective. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 25(2), 134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, A., & Codd, H. (2008). Prisoners’ families and offender management: Mobilizing social capital. Probation Journal, 55(1), 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, R. G., Carriaga, M. L., Diamond, B., Piquero, N. L., & Piquero, A. R. (2012). Does prison strain lead to prison misbehavior? An application of general strain theory to inmate misconduct. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(3), 194–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, S., & McKeganey, N. (2000). The rise and rise of peer education approaches. Drugs: Education Prevention and Policy, 7(3), 293–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrin, C., & Blagden, N. (2014). Accumulating meaning, purpose and opportunities to change “drip by drip”: The impact of being a listener in prison. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20(9), 902–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrin, C., Blagden, N., Winder, B., & Dillon, G. (2017). “It’s sort of reaffirmed to me that I’m not a Monster, I’m not a terrible person”: Sex offenders’ movements toward desistance via peer-support roles in prison. Sexual Abuse, 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063217697133.

  • Post, S. G. (2005). Altruism, happiness, and health: It’s good to be good. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 12(2), 66–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuss, A. (1999). Prison(er) education. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 38(2), 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocheleau, A. M. (2013). An empirical exploration of the “pains of imprisonment” and the level of prison misconduct and violence. Criminal Justice Review, 38(3), 354–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, D. R., & Clear, T. R. (2003). Incarceration, reentry, and social capital. In J. Travis & M. Waul (Eds.), Prisoners once removed: The impact of incarceration and reentry on children, families, and communities (pp. 189–232). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samaritans. (2016). The Listener Scheme. Samaritans. Available at: https://www.samaritans.org/your-community/our-work-prisons/listener-scheme. Accessed 18 Aug 2017.

  • Schwartz, B. K. (2003). Correctional psychology: Practice, programming, and administration. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, C. E., & Sendor, R. M. (1999). Helping others helps oneself: Response shift effects in peer support. Social Science and Medicine, 48(11), 1563–1575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon Trust. (2005). For Mentors. Shannon Trust. Available at: http://www.shannontrust.org.uk/our-work/for-mentors. Accessed 14 July 2017.

  • Sirdifield, C. (2006). Piloting a new role in mental health-prison based health trainers. Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice, 1(4), 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, C. L. (2003). Generativity versus stagnation: An elaboration of Erikson’s adult stage of human development. Journal of Adult Development, 10(1), 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, P. (2004). Peer support/peer provided services underlying processes, benefits, and critical ingredients. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 27(4), 392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprangers, M. A., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science and Medicine, 48(11), 1507–1515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, B., & Wooldredge, J. (2008). Inmate versus environmental effects on prison rule violations. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(4), 438–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz, K. F., Schaefer, B. P., & Green, E. L. (2016). Anything but boring: A cultural criminological exploration of boredom. Theoretical Criminology, 21(3), 342–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. (1958). The society of captives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, M. R., Oort, F. J., Lanschot, J. J. B., Velden, J., Kloek, J. J., Gouma, D. J., et al. (2013). The role of recalibration response shift in explaining bodily pain in cancer patients undergoing invasive surgery: An empirical investigation of the Sprangers and Schwartz model. Psycho-Oncology, 22(3), 515–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., & Brown, M. (2004). The good lives model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10(3), 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware, J., Frost, A., & Hoy, A. (2010). A review of the use of therapeutic communities with sexual offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(5), 721–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, N., & Draine, J. (2004). Dynamics of social capital of prisoners and community reentry: Ties that bind? Journal of Correctional Health Care, 10(3), 457–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S., Crewe, B., & Hulley, S. (2017). Suppression, denial, sublimation: Defending against the initial pains of very long life sentences. Theoretical Criminology, 21(2), 225–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Perrin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Perrin, C. (2018). Coping with Incarceration: The Emerging Case for the Utility of Peer-Support Programmes in Prison. In: Mills, A., Kendall, K. (eds) Mental Health in Prisons. Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94090-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94090-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94089-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94090-8

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics