Abstract
Liberal states traditionally rely on a reasonably narrow set of tools for engaging in social regulation. All of these tools are meant to change individual behaviors. Laws come with implicit force, financial regulations come with monetary carrots and sticks, and information provision informs people of the things that policymakers think they should know. Each of these is meant to guide individual choice making by changing how people evaluate their available options. Because this set of tools is meant to change individual behaviors, it is worth considering what implicit assumptions this set of tools makes about the individuals whose behaviors policymakers are looking to change. Behavioral and social science has not only found some limitations on existing policy tools but has also pointed in the direction of some new tools as well. This is because the model of human choice and behavior is now richer. Nudges and norms provide an expanded toolset for policymakers but raise interesting questions about the legitimacy of the state taking advantage of reductions in agency to achieve policy ends. I argue that this framing misconstrues the situation and suggest that the appropriate guide to any options in the policy tool kit is one of nurturing rather than inhibiting citizen autonomy. Sometimes, this will recommend the use of norms or nudges in place of the standard policy tools.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Works Cited
Allcott, Hunt. 2011. Social Norms and Energy Conservation. Journal of Public Economics 95 (9): 1082–1095.
Bicchieri, Cristina. 2005. The Grammar of Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2016. Norms in The Wild: How to Diagnose, Measure and Change Social Norms. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bicchieri, Cristina and Ryan Muldoon. 2011. Social Norms, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring Edition). Edward N. Zalta (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/social-norms/.
Conly, Sarah. 2012. Against Autonomy: Justifying Coercive Paternalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Costa, Dora L., and Matthew E. Kahn. 2013. Energy Conservation “Nudges” and Environmentalist Ideology: Evidence from a Randomized Residential Electricity Field Experiment. Journal of the European Economic Association 11 (3): 680–702.
Fraud, Error and Debt. 2012. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/fraud-error-and-debt-behavioural-insights-team-paper. UK Government Report, February.
Goldstein, N., R. Cialdini, and V. Griskevicius. 2008. A Room with a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels. Journal of Consumer Research 35 (3): 472–482.
Lewis, M.A., and C. Neighbors. 2006. Social Norms Approaches Using Descriptive Drinking Norms Education: A Review of the Research on Personalized Normative Feedback. Journal of American College Health 54 (4): 213.
Muldoon, Ryan. 2017. Perspectives, Norms and Agency. Social Philosophy and Policy 34 (1): 260–276.
Thaler and Sunstein. 2009. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. New York: Penguin Books.
Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein. 2003. Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron. University of Chicago Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper No. 43.
World Bank. 2015. World Development Report 2015: Mind, Society and Behavior. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Muldoon, R. (2018). Norms, Nudges, and Autonomy. In: Boonin, D. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophy and Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93907-0_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93907-0_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93906-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93907-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)