Abstract
If images were invented to try and replicate human vision and freeze time, then representation seems to have a lot in common with the way a person uses his eyes while taking a walk or when he stops to rest. This paper examines whether it is possible to associate walking and standing still with the two basic representation methods in order to see if, in history, drawing with contour lines can be associated with movement, and luminist, chiaroscuro and coloured drawings with standing still and reflection. Actually this game of linking movement-line and idleness-colour/surface/light/matter is not new: probably rooted in antiquity, it has been taken into consideration in the last hundred and fifty years when it was approached by exploding representation limits and trying to put pieces together in a different context, where dimensions where added or reduced: let’s think about Abbot’s Flatland and of Dewdney’s Planiverse. Both operations seem to be strictly linked to the course of non-euclidean geometries, which where indicating new horizons for geometry and representation science since Euclidean space was put under discussion. In fact, it doesn’t look so uncommon to relate representation codes to the way we move in space and occupying space is not really far from an aesthetic experience. In his Walkscapes, Careri writes: “apart from being an action, walking is also a sign […]. The world becomes a vast aesthetic land, an enormous canvas on which we draw when we walk”. Clearly, the aesthetics considered in this context involves the creation of space and architectures rather than representation. But if this distinction between full and empty spaces associated respectively either with being sedentary or with erratic wanderings holds true, then perhaps representation itself may be considered rooted in this duality. Even if we mean to limit our discussion to the dynamics of bodies in space, avoiding to afford dynamic representations, literature leads today to new and wider borders spacing from territory to fashion and the issue is not limited to representation but involves visual approaches in a broader meaning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abbot EA (1884) Flatland. A romance of many dimensions. Seeley & Co, London
Abbot E A (2010) Flatland. A romance of many dimensions. In: Marz Harper L (ed) Peterborough. Broadview Editions, Canada
Aristotle (2013) In: Poetics (trans: Kenny A). Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bartocci C (2011) Geometrie vittoriane. Introduction to E. A. Abbott, Flatlandia. Einaudi, Torino, pp V–XXXI
Brusatin M (1999) Storia dei colori. Einaudi, Torino
Careri F (2006) Walkscapes. Camminare come pratica estetica. Einaudi, Torino
Carlevaris L (2011) Luce, superficie, visione: il modello come metafora. In: Albisinni P, De Carlo L (eds) Architettura, disegno, modello. Verso un archivio digitale dell’opera di maestri del XX secolo. Gangemi Editore, Roma, pp 97–108
Ciammaichella M (2016a) Animazione di corpi rappresentati, fra scienza e progetto. Animation of represented body. In: Bini M, Bertocci S (eds) Le ragioni del disegno. Pensiero, Forma e Modello nella Gestione della Complessità. Proceedings. Gangemi Editore, Roma, pp 767–774
Ciammaichella M (2016b) L’immagine in movimento. Origine e sviluppo del Fashion film. Officina 12:24–28
Cometa M (2012) La struttura delle immagini. Letteratura e cultura visuale. Raffaello Cortina Editore, Palermo
da Vinci L (1835) A Treatise on painting by Leonardo da Vinci (trans: Rigaud JF). J. B. Nichols & Son, London
Deleuze G, Guattari F (1995) Mille plateaux. In: Nomadologia. Castelvecchi, Roma
Dewdney AK (1984). The planiverse. Poseidon Press
Euclide (2011) In: Incardona F (ed) Ottica. Immagini di una teoria della visione. Di Renzo Editore, Roma
Falcinelli (2011) Guardare, pensare, progettare. Neuroscienze per il design. Stampa Alternativa, Viterbo
Galileo Galilei (1977) In: Flora F (ed) Il Saggiatore. Einaudi, Torino
Hinton CH (1907) An episode on Flatland. Or how a Plane folk discovered the third dimension. Swan Sonnenschein, London
Ingold T (2015) The life of lines. Routledge, New York
Monticelli B (2006) Percezione Visiva e design. http://www.psicolab.net/2006/percezione-visiva-e-design-2/. Accessed 6 Oct 2017
Nuccitelli G (2003) Origine dell’arte e arte delle origini. L’Harmattan Italia, SL
Ptolémée C (1989) L’Optique de Claude Ptolémée dans la version latine d’après l’arabe de l’émir Eugéne de Sicile. Edition critique et exégétique augmentée d’une traduction française et de compléments par A. Lejeune. Brill, Leiden
Rizzini I (1998) L’occhio parlante. Per una semiotica dello sguardo nel mondo antico. Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti, Venezia
Sartorius von Waltershausen W (1856) Gauss: zum gedächtnis. Leipzig
Sylvester JJ (1870) A plea for the mathematician. In: The laws of verse. Longmans, Green, London
Yarbus AL (1967) Eye movements and vision. Plenum Press, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Carlevaris, L. (2019). Movement and Immobility: The Two Faces of Representation. In: Marcos, C. (eds) Graphic Imprints. EGA 2018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93749-6_63
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93749-6_63
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93748-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93749-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)