Abstract
This chapter expands and enriches existing characterisations and premises of strong transdisciplinarity to develop the concept of “Transforming Transdisciplinarity”. Erich Jantsch’s, Basarab Nicolescu’s, and Manfred Max-Neef’s notions of strong transdisciplinarity all aim to stretch, transcend or reconstruct the Cartesian-Newtonian paradigm. Other theoretical orientations linked by Jantsch, Nicolescu, and Max-Neef to strong transdisciplinarity, such as systems theory and complexity theory, also share similar intentions. However, whereas Max-Neef critiqued only the onto-epistemological premise of the Cartesian-Newtonian paradigm in defining strong transdisciplinarity, these other theoretical orientations offer an extended, more holistic critique across six integrated meaning systems of which a societal paradigm or individual worldview could be comprised: cosmologies, ontologies, epistemologies, axiologies, anthropologies, and social visions. Each of these six meaning systems is quite distinct, but together they form an integrated, holistic framework, or mythic structure of a paradigm (Kauffman S, Humanity in a creative universe. Oxford University Press, New York, 2016). We argue that in order to be truly transformative, collaborative transdisciplinary researchers should make space to reflect on the power and influence of these six meaning systems in their research.
After exploring the lineage of strong transdisciplinarity, we offer a (very) short synthesis of the dominant Cartesian-Newtonian paradigm’s intellectual roots, and then synthesise the alternative paradigms put forward by transdisciplinary theorists and the theoretical orientations linked to transdisciplinarity. What binds these thinkers together is their repeating call for shifting our efforts towards a process-focused, relational, complexivist paradigm, across all meaning systems or mythic structures. Their collective voice is the raison d’être for Transforming Transdisciplinarity. We intend for this synthesis of the premise for Transforming Transdisciplinarity to offer a stronger catalyst for collectively engaging in third order learning (Sterling S, Learn Teach Higher Educ 5:17–33, 2010) within collaborative research projects. In other words, our intent is to provide an impetus and resource for collective and individual transformative third order learning (paradigmatic stretching) within collaborative processes that could support a more holistic “strong” transdisciplinarity and thus the development of deeply restorative paradigms and worldviews. This intent stands in contrast with the status quo of the dominant Cartesian-Newtonian worldview, where we risk having our efforts inadvertently or unknowingly contribute to the root causes of the wicked complexities that we are collectively working to address.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
An adaptation of Montuori in Morin (2008, xxxi).
References
Abson, D., Fischer, J., Leventon, J., Newig, J., Schomerus, T., Vilsmaier, U., et al. (2017). Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio, 46, 30–39.
Aeberhard, A., & Rist, S. (2009). Transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge in the development of organic agriculture in Switzerland. Ecological Economics, 68, 1171–1181.
Alhadeff-Jones, M. (2008). Three generations of complexity theories: Nuances and ambiquities. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 66–82.
Aluli Meyer, M. (2013). Holographic epistemology: Native common sense. China Media Research, 9(2), 94–101.
Bagnol, B., Clarke, E., Li, M., Maulaga, W., Lumbwe, H., McConchie, R., et al. (2016). Transdisciplinary project communication and knowledge sharing experiences in Tanzania and Zambia through a One Health Lens. Frontiers in Public Health, 4(10), 1–6.
Balsiger, J. (2015). Transdisciplinarity in the class room? Simulating the co-production of sustainability knowledge. Futures, 65, 185–194.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
Barrett, M. J., Harmin, M., Maracle, B., Patterson, M., Thomson, C., Flowers, M., & Bors, K. (2016). Shifting relations with the more-than-human: Six threshold concepts for transformative sustainability learning. Environmental Education Research, 23(1), 131–143.
Berstein, J. H. (2015). Transdisciplinarity: A review of its origins, development, and current issues. Journal of Research Practice, 11(1), Article R1.
Blackburn, T. (1971). Sensuous-intellectual complementarity in science. Science, 172(3987), 1003–1007.
Bolton, G. (2010). Reflection and reflexivity: What and why. In G. Bolton (Ed.), Reflective practice: Writing and professional development. London: Sage.
Brown, V. A., Harris, J., & Russel, J. (2010). Tackling wicked problems through the transdisciplinary imagination. New York: Earthscan.
Buchanan, J. (2016). Developing a transdisciplinary heuristic framework for complex problems in agriculture and environment. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
Callon, M. (2005). Disabled persons of all countries, unite! In B. Latour & P. Weibel (Eds.), Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Capra, F. (1982). The turning point: Science, society and the rising culture. New York: Harper Collins.
Capra, F. (1996). Web of life. London: Harper Collins.
Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2010). Soft systems methodology. In M. Reynolds & S. Holwell (Eds.), Systems approaches to managing change: A practical guide (pp. 191–242). London: Springer.
CIRET. (1997). Declaration and recommendations of the international congress: Which University for Tomorrow? Towards a transdisciplinary evolution of the university. Locarno Declaration. Locarno, Switzerland.
Clarke, E. A. (2016). The synergies of difference: Strengthening transdisciplinary research practice through a relational methodology. Canberra: Australian National University.
Cochrane, J. R. (2014). Thinking about complexity: Transdisciplinarity and research on religion and health in Africa. Religion and Theology, 21, 333–357.
Cole, A. (2007). Mediated modelling, strong transdisciplinarity and sustainable resource management in the Motueka Catchment of New Zealand. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(4), 345–364.
Cole, A. (2017). Towards an indigenous transdisciplinarity. In H. Dieleman, B. Nicolescu, & A. Ertas (Eds.), Transdisciplinarity & interdisciplinarity: Education and research (pp. 129–160). The Academy of Transdisciplinary Learning & Advanced Studies Publishing. Geneva: Inderscience Publishers
Darder, A. (2015). Freire and education. New York: Routledge.
De la Sienra, E., Smith, T., & Mitchell, C. (2017). Worldviews, a mental construct hiding the potential of human behaviour: A new learning framework to guide education for sustainable development. Journal of Sustainability Education, 13(March), 1–21.
De Witt, A., de Boer, J., Hedlund, N., & Osseweijer, P. (2016). A new tool to map the major worldviews in the Netherlands and USA, and explore how they relate to climate change. Environmental Science and Policy, 63, 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.05.012.
Dewey, J. (1910). The influence of Darwin on philosophy and other essays in contemporary thought. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Dewey, J. (1933/1998). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Dewey, J. (1938/1963). Experience and education. New York: Collier.
Espinosa, A., & Walker, J. (2017). A complexity approach to sustainability: Theory and application (2nd ed.). London: Impreiral College Press.
Freire, P. (1970/1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin.
Freire, P. (1974/2005). Education for critical consciousness. London: Continuum.
Garrison, J., Neubert, S., & Reich, K. (2012). John Dewey’s philosophy of education: An introduction and recontextualization for our times. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Hedlund-de Witt, A., de Boer, J., & Boersema, J. J. (2014). Exploring inner and outer worlds: A quantitative study of worldviews, environmental attitudes, and sustainable lifestyles. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 37, 40–54.
Inayatullah, S. (2008). Six pillars: Futures thinking for transforming. Foresight, 10(1), 4–21.
Ingebrigtsen, S., & Jakobsen, O. (2012). Utopias and realism in ecological economics – Knowledge, understanding and improvisation. Ecological Economics, 84, 84–90.
Ison, R. (2017). Transdisciplinarity as transformation: A cybersytemic thinking in practice. In D. Fam, J. Palmer, C. Reidy, & C. Mitchell (Eds.), Transdisciplinary research and practice for sustainability outcomes. London: Routledge.
Jacobs, I., & Nienaber, S. (2011). Waters without borders: Transboundary water governance and the role of the ‘transdisciplinary individual’ in Southern Africa. Water South Africa, 37(5), 365–378.
Jahn, T., Bergman, M., & Keil, F. (2012). Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecological Economics, 79, 1–10.
Jantsch, E. (1970). Inter- and transdisciplinary university: A systems approach to education and innovation. Policy Sciences, 1, 403–428.
Jantsch, E. (1972). Towards interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in education and innovation. In L. Apostell, G. Berger, A. Briggs, & G. Michaud (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities (pp. 97–127). Paris: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation and OECD.
Jantsch, E. (1980). The self-organising universe: Scientific and human implications of the emerging paradigm of evolution. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Kauffman, S. (2016). Humanity in a creative universe. New York: Oxford University Press.
Khoo, S.-M. (2017). Sustainable knowledge transformation in and through higher education: A case for transdisciplinary leadership. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 8(3), 5–24.
Kingsley, J., Patrick, R., Horwitz, P., Parkes, M., Jenkins, A., Massy, C., et al. (2015). Exploring ecosystems and health by shifting to a regional focus: Perspectives from the Oceania EcoHealth chapter. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12, 12706–12722.
Kleiber, C. (2001). What kind of science does our world need today and tomorrow? A new contract between science and society. In J. Thompson Klein et al. (Eds.), Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem solving among science, technology, and society. An effective way for managing complexity (pp. 47–58). Boston: Birkhauser Verlag.
Kolb, D. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
Kooiman, J., & Jentoft, S. (2009). Meta-governance: Values, norms, and principles, and the making of hard choices. Public Administration, 87(4), 818–836.
Kuhn, T. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lange, E. (2017). Transformative sustainability education: From sustainababble to a civilization leap. In M. Milana, S. Webb, J. Holford, R. Waller, & P. Jarvis (Eds.), Palgrave international handbook on adult and lifelong education and learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan (in press).
Lent, J. (2017). Introduction: Shaping our history. In J. Lent (Ed.), Patterning instinct: A cultural history of humanities search for meaning. New York: Promethus Books.
Lewis, S., & Malsin, M. (2015). Defining the Anthropocene. Nature, 519, 171–180.
Macedo, D. (2006). Literacies of power: What Americans are not allowed to know. Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.
Macy, J. (1991). World as lover; world as self. Berkeley: Parallax Press.
Mastrangelo, M., Weyland, F., Herrera, L. P., Villarino, S., Barral, M., & Auer, A. D. (2015). Ecosystem services research in contrasting socio-ecological contexts of Argentina: Critical assessment and future directions. Ecosystem Services, 16, 63–73.
Max-Neef, M. (2005). Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics, 53(2005), 5–16.
Meadows, D. (1999). Leverage points: Places to intervene in a system. The Sustainability Institute: Vermont.
Meadows, D. (2004). The limits to growth: The 30-year update. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing Company.
Mezirow, J. (1994). Understanding transformation theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 44(4), 222–232.
Montuori, A. (2013). Complexity and transdisciplinarity: Reflections on theory and practice. World Futures, 69(4-6), 200–230.
Montuori, A. (2017). Nature of creativity. In E. G. Carayannis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Springer.
Morin, E., & Kern, A. B. (1998). Homeland earth: A manifesto for the new millenium. Cresskill: Hampton Press.
Morin, E. (2001). Seven complex lessons in education for the future. Education on the move. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
Morin, E. (2006). Restricted complexity, general complexity. Presented at the Colloquium “Intelligence de la complexit ́e : ́epist ́emologie et pragmatique”. Cerisy-La-Salle, France.
Morin, E. (2008). On complexity. New Jersey: Hampton Press.
Morton, L. W., Eigenbrode, S. D., & Martin, T. A. (2015). Architectures of adaptive integration in large collaborative projects. Ecology and Society, 20(4), 5.
Nicolescu, B. (2002). Manifesto of transdisciplinarity (K. C. Voss, Trans.). New York: State University of New York Press.
Nicolescu, B. (2006). Transdisciplinarity – Past, present, future. In B. Haverkort & C. Reijntjes (Eds.), Moving worldviews – Reshaping sciences, policies and practices for endogenous sustainable development (pp. 142–166). Leusden: Compas Editions.
Nicolescu, B. (2010). Methodology of transdisciplinarity – Levels of reality, logic of the included middle and complexity. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 1(1), 19–38.
Nicolescu, B. (2014). Methodology of transdisciplinarity. World Futures, 70(3–4), 186–199.
Obeng-Odoom, F. (2016). Editorial: The wretched of the earth. Journal of Australian Political Economy, 78, 5–23.
Osberg, D. (2015). Learning, complexity and emergent (irreversible) change. In D. Scott & E. Hargreaves (Eds.), The Sage handbook of learning (pp. 23–50). Los Angeles: Sage.
Putriene, N. (2014). Interdisciplinary study programs: Controversies of concept and structure. Social Sciences, 4(86), 70–77.
Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Cornerstone Publishing.
Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A. s., Chapin, F. S. I., Lambin, E., et al. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 32.
Scholz, R., & Marks, D. (2001). Learning about transdisciplinarity: Where are we? Where have we been? Where should we go? In J. Thompson Klein, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, R. Häberli, A. Bill, R. W. Scholz, & M. Welti (Eds.), Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem solving among science, technology and society. An effective way for managing complexity (pp. 236–252). Boston: Berkhauser-Verlag.
Scholz, R., & Steiner, G. (2015). The real type and ideal type of transdisciplinary processes: Part I – Theoretical foundations. Sustainability Science, 10(4), 527–544.
Schweizer-Ries, P., & Perkins, D. D. (2012). Sustainability science: Transdisciplinarity, transepistemology, and action research: Introduction to the special issue. Umweltpsychologie, 16(1), 6–11.
Snowden, D., & Boone, M. (2007). A leader’s framework for decision making. Havard Business Review, 85(11), 69–76.
Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O., & Ludwig, C. (2015). The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The great acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 81–98.
Sterling, S. (2010). Transformational learning and sustainability: Sketching the conceptual ground. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 5, 17–33.
Stock, P., & Burton, R. J. F. (2011). Defining terms for integrated (multi-inter-trans-disciplinary) sustainability research. Sustainability, 3, 1090–1113.
Stuckey, P. (2010). Being known by a birch tree: Animist refigurings of western epistemology. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture, 4(3), 182–205.
Sunde, C. H. (2008). The water or the waves: Toward an ecosystem approach for cross-cultural dialogue on the Whanganui River, New Zealand. In D. Waltner-Toews, J. J. Kay, & N.-M. E. Lister (Eds.), The ecosystem approach: Complexity, uncertainty and managing for sustainability. New York: Columbia University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ross, K., Mitchell, C. (2018). Transforming Transdisciplinarity: An Expansion of Strong Transdisciplinarity and Its Centrality in Enabling Effective Collaboration. In: Fam, D., Neuhauser, L., Gibbs, P. (eds) Transdisciplinary Theory, Practice and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93743-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93743-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93742-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93743-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)