Skip to main content

A Comparison of Optimization Methods for Multi-objective Constrained Bin Packing Problems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Integration of Constraint Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Operations Research (CPAIOR 2018)

Abstract

Despite the existence of efficient solution methods for bin packing problems, in practice these seldom occur in such a pure form but feature instead various considerations such as pairwise conflicts or profits between items, or aiming for balanced loads amongst the bins. The Wedding Seating Problem is a combinatorial optimization problem incorporating elements of bin packing with conflicts, bin packing with profits, and load balancing. We use this representative problem to present and compare constraint programming, integer programming, and metaheuristic approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lewis, R.: Constructing wedding seating plans: a tabu subject. In: CSREA Press, pp. 24–32 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miettinen, K.: Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5563-6

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Lewis, R., Carroll, F.: Creating seating plans: a practical application. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 67(11), 1353–1362 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bellows, M.L., Peterson, J.D.L.: Finding an optimal seating chart for a wedding. https://www.improbable.com/2012/02/12/finding-an-optimal-seating-chart-for-a-wedding. Accessed 23 May 2018

  5. Schaus, P.: Solving balancing and bin-packing problems with constraint programming. Ph.D thesis, Université catholique de Louvain (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sadykov, R., Vanderbeck, F.: Bin packing with conflicts: a generic branch-and-price algorithm. INFORMS J. Comput. 25(2), 244–255 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, Z., Han, X., Dósa, G., Tuza, Z.: Bin packing game with an interest matrix. In: Xu, D., Du, D., Du, D. (eds.) COCOON 2015. LNCS, vol. 9198, pp. 57–69. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21398-9_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Shaw, P.: A constraint for bin packing. In: Wallace, M. (ed.) CP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3258, pp. 648–662. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30201-8_47

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Pesant, G.: Achieving domain consistency and counting solutions for dispersion constraints. INFORMS J. Comput. 27(4), 690–703 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Gualandi, S., Lombardi, M.: A simple and effective decomposition for the multidimensional binpacking constraint. In: Schulte, C. (ed.) CP 2013. LNCS, vol. 8124, pp. 356–364. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40627-0_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Bron, C., Kerbosch, J.: Algorithm 457: finding all cliques of an undirected graph. Commun. ACM 16(9), 575–577 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shaw, P.: Using constraint programming and local search methods to solve vehicle routing problems. In: Maher, M., Puget, J.-F. (eds.) CP 1998. LNCS, vol. 1520, pp. 417–431. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49481-2_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Mitsos, A., Chachuat, B., Barton, P.I.: Mccormick-based relaxations of algorithms. SIAM J. Optim. 20(2), 573–601 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Boland, N., Charkhgard, H., Savelsbergh, M.: A criterion space search algorithm for biobjective integer programming: the balanced box method. INFORMS J. Comput. 27(4), 735–754 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support for this research was provided by NSERC Discovery Grant 218028/2017 and CERC, École Polytechnique de Montréal.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe Olivier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Olivier, P., Lodi, A., Pesant, G. (2018). A Comparison of Optimization Methods for Multi-objective Constrained Bin Packing Problems. In: van Hoeve, WJ. (eds) Integration of Constraint Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Operations Research. CPAIOR 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10848. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93031-2_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93031-2_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93030-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93031-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics