Abstract
Climate change poses risks to biodiversity and to the socioecological systems dependent on it in Brazil. However, the country’s natural wealth, its biodiversity and ecosystems, are simultaneously among the main source of alternatives for mitigation and adaptation. This review shows that increase in temperature of >2oC, towards the end of this century, will have severe impacts upon biodiversity in Brazil. Impacts include high rates of species extinction, geographic dislocation of species (particularly towards the south), savannization of forests and impoverishment of savanna and other open vegetation, significant reductions in the number of days of growth per year for tropical forest species, and impacts on agriculture due to decline in populations of important pollinators. Most Brazilian biomes are particularly sensitive to climate change and ecosystem such as those at high-altitude, coastal and marine, and urban areas are largely vulnerable. Ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change emerges as a key option for Brazil to reduce societal vulnerability. Science and policy related to biodiversity conservation and ecological restoration will need to incorporate climate change background on prioritisation efforts and implementation. The main conclusion of this review is that bringing biodiversity and ecosystems to the centre of the development process of Brazil, rather than treating them as an obstacle to development, will be a strategic step both to fight climate change and to promote a sustainable and inclusive development.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
SNUC = National Conservation Units System; Planaveg = National Native Vegetation Restoration Plan; New Forest Code = Native Vegetation Protection Law.
References
Aguiar, L. M. S., Bernard, E., Ribeiro, V., Machado, R. B., & Jones, G. (2016). Should I stay or should I go? Climate change effects on the future of Neotropical savannah bats. Global Ecology and Conservation, 5, 22–33.
Anadón, J. D., Sala, O. E., & Maestre, F. T. (2014). Climate change will increase savannas at the expense of forests and treeless vegetation in tropical and subtropical Americas. Journal of Ecology, 102, 1363–1373.
Baillie, J. E. M., Hilton-Taylor, C., & Stuart, S. N. (Eds.). (2004). 2004 IUCN red list of threatened species. A global species assessment. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
Balch, J. K., Brando, P. M., Nepstad, D. C., Coe, M. T., Silvério, D., Massad, T. J., et al. (2015). The susceptibility of southeastern Amazon forests to fire: Insights from a large-scale burn experiment. Bioscience, 65(9), 893–905.
Beaugrand, G., Edwards, M., Raybaud, V., Goberville, E., & Kirby, R. R. (2015). Future vulnerability of marine biodiversity compared with contemporary and past changes. Nature Climate Change, 5, 695–701.
Béllard, C., Leclerc, C., Leroy, B., Bakkenes, M., Veloz, S., Thuiller, W., et al. (2014). Vulnerability of biodiversity hotspots to global change. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 23, 1376–1386.
Cunningham, C., Cunha, A. P., Brito, S., Marengo, J., & Coutinho, M. (2017). Climate change and drought in Brazil. In B. Marchezini, B. Wisner, L. R. Londe, & S. M. Saito (Eds.), Reduction of vulnerability to disaters: From knowledge to action (pp. 361–375). São Carlos, Brazil: Editora RiMa.
Descombes, P., Wisz, M. S., Leprieur, F., Parravicini, V., Heine, C., Olsen, S. M., et al. (2015). Forecasted coral reef decline in marine biodiversity hotspots under climate change. Global Change Biology, 21(7), 2479–2487.
Diamond, J. M. (1989). Overview of recent extinctions. In D. Western & M. C. Pearl (Eds.), Conservation for the twenty-first century (pp. 37–41). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Faleiro, F. A. V. M., Nemésio, A., & Loyola, R. (2018). Climate change likely to reduce orchid bee abundance even in climatic suitable sites. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14112
Faleiro, F. V., Machado, R. B., & Loyola, R. D. (2013). Defining spatial conservation priorities in the face of land-use and climate change. Biological Conservation, 158, 248–257.
Feeley, K. J., & Silman, M. (2016). Disappearing climates may limit the efficacy of Amazonian protected areas in a warming world. Diversity and Distributions, 22, 1081–1084.
Ferro, V. G., Lemes, P., Melo, A. S., & Loyola, R. (2014). The reduced effectiveness of protected areas under climate change threatens Atlantic forest tiger moths. PLoS One, 9, e107792.
Fisher, J. A., Patenaude, G., Kalpana, G., et al. (2014). Understanding the relationships between ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: A conceptual framework. Ecosystem Services, 7, 34–45.
Giannini, T. C., Tambosi, L. R., Acosta, J. R., Saraiva, A. M., Imperatriz-Fonseca, V. L., & Metzger, J. P. (2015). Safeguarding ecosystem services: A methodological framework to buffer the joint effect of habitat configuration and climate change. PLoS One, 10(6), e0129225.
Godoy, M. D. P., & Lacerda, L. D. (2015). Mangroves response to climate change: A review of recent findings on mangrove extension and distribution. Anais da Gym Brasileira de Ciências, 87(2), 651–667.
Hoffmann, D., Vasconcelos, M. F., & Martins, R. P. (2015). How climate change can affect the distribution range and conservation status of an endemic bird from the highlands of eastern Brazil: The case of the gray-backed Tachuri, Polystictus superciliaris (Aves, Tyrannidae). Biota Neotropica, 15(2), 1–12.
IPCC. (2007). Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
IPCC. (2013). Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Joly, C., Metzger, J. P., & Tabarelli, M. (2014). Experiences from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: Ecological findings and conservation initiatives. New Phytologist, 204, 459–473.
Jones, H. P., Hole, D. G., & Zavaleta, E. S. (2012). Harnessing nature to help people adapt to climate change. Nature Climate Change, 2(7), 504–509.
Jones, K. R., Watson, J. E. M., Possingham, H. P., & Klein, C. J. (2016). Incorporating climate change into spatial conservation prioritisation: A review. Biological Conservation, 194, 121–130.
Juhola, S., Glaas, E., Linnér, B.-O., & Neset, T.-S. (2016). Redefining maladaptation. Environmental Science and Policy, 55, 135–140.
Kasecker, T. P., Ramos-Neto, M. B., Silva, J. M. C., & Scarano, F. R. (2017). Ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change: Defining hotspot municipalities for policy design and implementation in Brazil. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies to Global Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-017-9768-6
Keith, D. A., Mahony, M., Hines, H., Elith, J., Regan, T. J., Baumgartner, J. B., et al. (2015). Detecting extinction risk from climate change by IUCN red list criteria. Conservation, 28(3–130), 810–819.
Laurance, W. F. (2015). Emerging threats to tropical forests. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 100(3), 159–169.
Leadley, P., Proença, V., Fernández-Manjarrés, P. H. M., Alkemade, R., Biggs, R., Bruley, E., et al. (2014). Interacting regional-scale regime shifts for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Bioscience 64(8):893–905: 665–679.
Lemes, P., & Loyola, R. D. (2013). Accommodating species climate-forced dispersal and uncertainties in spatial conservation planning. PLoS One, 8, e54323.
Loyola, R. D., Lemes, P., Brum, F. T., Provete, D. B., & Duarte, L. D. S. (2014). Clade-specific consequences of climate change to amphibians in Atlantic Forest protected areas. Ecography, 37, 65–72.
Lucena, A. J., Rotunno Filho, O. C., Peres, L. F., & France, J. R. A. (2012). A evolução da ilha de calor na region metropolitana do Rio de Janeiro. Revista Geonorte, 2(5) Edição Especial 2:8–21.
Mace, G., Masundire, H., & Baillie, J. E. M. (2005). Biodiversity. In R. Hassan, R. Scholes, & N. Ash (Eds.), Ecosystems and human well-being: Current state and trends: Findings of the condition and trends working group (pp. 77–122). Washington, DC: Island Press.
Magrin, G. O., Marengo, J. A., Boulanger, J.-P., Buckeridge, M. S., Castellanos, E., Poveda, G., et al. (2014). Central and South America. In V. R. Barros, C. B. Field, D. J. Dokken, M. D. Mastrandrea, K. J. Mach, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea, & L. L. White (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: Regional aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 1499–1566). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
McNeely, J. A., Mittermeier, R. A., Brooks, T. M., Boltz, F., & Ash, N. (2009). The wealth of nature: Ecosystem services, biodiversity, and human well-being. Arlington, TX: CEMEX, Conservation International.
Mittermeier, R. A., Robles-Gil, P., & Mittermeier, C. G. (1997). Megadiversity: Earth’s biologically wealthiest nations. Arlington, TX: CEMEX, Conservation International.
Mora, C., Caldwell, I. R., Caldwell, J. M., Fisher, M. R., Genco, B. M., & Running, S. W. (2015). Suitable days for plant growth disappear under projected climate change: potential human and biotic vulnerability. PLOS Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002167
Oliveira, G., Araújo, M. B., Rangel, T. F., Alagador, D., & Diniz-Filho, J. A. F. (2012). Conserving the Brazilian semiarid (Caatinga) biome under climate change. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21(11), 2913–2916.
Oliveira, G., Lima-Ribeiro, M. S., Terribile, L. C., Dobrovolski, R., Telles, M. P. C., & Diniz-Filho, J. A. F. (2015). Conservation biogeography of the cerrado’s wild edible plants under climate change: Linking biotic stability with agricultural expansion. Journal of Botany, 102, 6–1.
Pant, L. P., Adhikari, B., & Bhattarai, K. K. (2015). Adaptive transition for transformations to sustainability in developing countries. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 206–212.
Pires, A. P. F., Rezende, C. L., Assad, E. D., Loyola, R., & Scarano, F. R. (2017). Forest restoration can increase the Rio Doce watershed resilience. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 15, 187–193.
Rezende, C. L., Fraga, J. S., Sessa, J. C., Souza, G. V. P., Assad, E. D., & Scarano, F. R. (2018). Land use policy as a driver for climate change adaptation: A case in the domain of the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Land Use Policy, 72, 563–569.
Ribeiro, B. R., Sales, L. P., De Marco, P., & Loyola, R. (2016). Assessing mammal exposure to climate change in the Brazilian Amazon. PLoS One, 11, e0165073.
Rosenzweig, C., Solecki, W., Romero-Lankao, P., Mehrotra, S., Dhakal, S., Bowman, T., et al. (2015). ARC3.2 Summary for city leaders. Urban climate change research network. New York: Columbia University.
Sawyer, D. (2008). Climate change, biofuels and eco-social impacts in the Brazilian Amazon and Cerrado. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 1747–1752.
Scarano, F. R. (2017). Ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change: Concept, scalability and a role for conservation science. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 15, 65–73.
Scarano, F. R., & Ceotto, P. (2015). Brazilian Atlantic forest: Impact, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change. Biodiversity and Conservation 24(11), 2913–2916: 2319–2331.
Scarano, F. R., Guimarães, A., & Silva, J. M. (2012). Lead by example. Nature, 486, 25–26.
Seddon, A. W. R., Macias-Fauria, M., Long, P. R., Benz, D., & Willis, K. J. (2016). Sensitivity of global terrestrial ecosystems to climate variability. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16986
Segan, D. B., Murray, K. A., & Watson, J. E. M. (2016). A global assessment of current and future biodiversity vulnerability to habitat loss–climate change interactions. Global Ecology and Conservation, 5, 12–21.
Silva, J. M. C., & Prasad, S. (2017). Green and socioeconomic infrastructures in the Brazilian Amazon: Implications for a changing climate. Climate and Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2017.1411242
Souza-Filho, F. A., Scarano, F. R., Nicolodi, J. L., Vital, H., AHF, K., PEPF, T., et al. (2014). Recursos naturais, manejo e uso de ecosystems. In E. D. Assad & A. R. Magalhães (Eds.), Impactos, vulnerabilidades e adaptação às mudanças climáticas. Contribuição do Grupo de Trabalho 2 do Painel Brasileiro de Mudanças Climáticas ao Primeiro Relatório da Avaliação Nacional sobre Mudanças Climáticas (pp. 43–200). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: COPPE, Rio de Janeiro Federal University.
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Röckstrom, J., et al. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347, 1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
Strassburg, B. B. N., Brooks, T., Feltran-Barbieri, R., Iribarrem, A., Crouzeilles, R., Loyola, R., et al. (2017). Moment of truth for the Cerrado hotspot. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 1, 0099. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0099
Tabarelli, M., Leal, I. R., Scarano, F. R., & Silva, J. M. C. (2017). The future of the Caatinga. In S. JMC, I. R. Leal, & M. Tabarelli (Eds.), Caatinga (pp. 461–474). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Thomas, C. D., Cameron, A., Green, R. E., Bakkenes, M., Beaumont, L. J., Collingham, Y. C., et al. (2004). Extinction risk from climate change. Nature, 427, 145–148.
Urban, M. C. (2015). Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science, 348, 571–573.
Vieira, R. R. S., Ribeiro, B. R., Resende, F. M., Brum, F. T., Machado, N., Sales, L. P., et al. (2017). Compliance to Brazil’s forest code will not protect biodiversity and ecosystem services. Diversity and Distributions, 24, 434. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12700
Visconti, P., Bakkenes, M., Baisero, D., Brooks, T., Butchart, S. H. M., Joppa, L., et al. (2015). Projecting global biodiversity indicators under future development scenarios. Conservation Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12159
Yu, M., Wang, G., Parr, D., & Ahmed, K. F. (2014). Future changes of the terrestrial ecosystem based on a dynamic vegetation model driven with RCP8.5 climate projections from 19 GCMs. Climatic Change, 127, 257–271.
Zanin, M., Tessarolo, G., Machado, N., & Albernaz, A. L. M. (2017). Climatically-mediated landcover change: Impacts on Brazilian territory. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 89, 939–952.
Zwiener, V. P., Padial, A. A., Marques, M. C. M., Faleiro, F. V., Loyola, R., & Peterson, A. T. (2017). Planning for conservation and restoration under climate and land use change in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Diversity and Distributions, 23, 955–966.
Acknowledgements
I am very thankful to Prof. José Maria Cardoso da Silva (University of Miami, US) and Prof. Rafael Loyola (UFG, Brazil) for excellent suggestion for improving the manuscript. I am also grateful to the Brazilian Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (BPBES) for support (CNPq; project: 405593/2015-5).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scarano, F.R. (2019). Biodiversity Sector: Risks of Temperature Increase to Biodiversity and Ecosystems. In: Nobre, C., Marengo, J., Soares, W. (eds) Climate Change Risks in Brazil. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92881-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92881-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92880-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92881-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)