Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Innovation Districts as Turbines of Smart Strategy Policies in US and EU. Boston and Barcelona Experience

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Metropolitan Perspectives (ISHT 2018)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 100))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Across US the most intriguing interpretation of ‘Smart Strategies’ and the emerging model that embodies the idea of recreating an innovative urban ecosystem is well represented by the concept of ‘Innovation District’, a ‘geographic area where leading-edge anchor institutions and companies cluster and connect with start-ups, business incubators, and accelerators’. The city of Boston represents a paradigmatic case of flexible integration between urban economic redevelopment initiatives, changeable partnership architecture and exploitation of the potential of social innovation-related regeneration. The inspiration model of the ‘Innovation District’ of South Boston Seaport is referred to the 22@ Barcelona project, an initiative conceived in 2000 for regenerating an abandoned industrial site - ‘El Poblenou’- with new thriving mixed use urban activities. This can be considered controversial and almost paradoxical given the fact that the Europe 2020 official Agenda is deeply committed in applying the Smart Specialisation Strategy for creating virtuous ecosystem in European urban regions following the US policy models and innovation clusters. The major challenge for an effective Smart Strategy style interpretation is related to the potential ‘territorialisation’ of urban redevelopment visions. The ‘consciousness of places’ with their local cultures can become a key-driver for embedded innovation. The ‘place-based’ approach allows to build virtuous regeneration projects including the potential of territorial ‘dna’ related to the local communities for identifying, recovering and increasing the values of local cultural specificities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ark, B.V., O’Mahony, M., Timmer, M.: The productivity gap between Europe and the U.S.: trends and causes. J. Econ. Perspect. 22(1), 25–44 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barca, F.: An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy. A ‘place-based’ approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations (2009). http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/regi/dv/barca_report_/barca_report_en.pdf. Accessed 4 Mar 2018

  3. McCann, P., Ortega-Argilés, R.: Smart specialisation regional growth and applications to european union cohesion policy. Reg. Stud. 49(8), 1291–1302 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Foray, D., David, P.A., Hall, B.H.: Smart specialisation. From academic idea to political instrument, the surprising career of a concept and the difficulties involved in its implementation. Ecole Polytechnique Féderale Lausanne: working paper 170252 (2011). http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/29ad/6773ef30f362d7d3937c483003d974bc91c5.pdf. Accessed 4 Mar 2018

  5. Falk, M.: What drives business R&D intensity across OECD countries? Appl. Econ. 38(5), 533–547 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Mahony, M., Vecchi, M.: Quantifying the impact of ICT capital on output growth: a heterogeneous dynamic panel approach. Economica 72(288), 615–633 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Camagni, R., Capello, R.: Regional innovation patterns and the EU regional policy reform: toward smart innovation policies. Growth Change 44(2), 355–389 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Capello, R., Cappellin, R., Ferlaino, F., Rizzi, P.: Territorial Patterns of Innovation. Franco Angeli, Milano (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Capello, R.: Smart specialisation strategy and the new EU cohesion policy reform: introductory remarks. Sci. Reg. 13(1), 5–14 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Iacobucci, D.: Designing and implementing a smart specialisation strategy at a regional level: some open question. Sci. Reg. 13(1), 107–126 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coffano, M., Foray, D.: The centrality of entrepreneurial discovery in building and implementing a smart specialisation strategy. Sci. Reg. 13(1), 33–50 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hausmann, R., Rodrik, D.: Economic development as self-discovery. J. Dev. Econ. 72(2), 603–633 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Porter, M.E.: The competitive advantage of notions. Harvard Bus. Rev. 68(2), 73–93 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Porter, M.E.: Competitive advantage, agglomeration economies, and regional policy. Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 19(1–2), 85–90 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marshall, A.: Principles of Economics. Macmillan, London (1920)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Porter, M.E.: On Competition. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Martin, R., Sunley, P.: Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea? J. Econ. Geogr. 3(1), 5–35 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aranguren, M.J., Wilson, J.R.: What can experience with clusters teach us about fostering regional smart specialisation. Ekonomiaz 83(2), 126–145 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lerner, J.: Boulevard of Broken Dreams. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Porter, M.E.: Clusters and Economic Policy: Aligning Public Policy with the New Economics of Competition. Harvard Business School Paper (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chatterji, A., Glaeser, E., Kerr, W.: Cluster of entrepreneurship and innovation. Innov. Policy Econ. 14(1), 129–166 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rauch, J.: Productivity gains from geographic concentration of human capital: evidence from the cities. J. Urban Econ. 34(3), 380–400 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Florida, R.: The Rise of the Creative Class. Basic Books, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Glaeser, E., Kerr, W., Ponzetto, G.: Clusters of entrepreneurship. J. Urban Econ. 67(1), 150–168 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Samila, S., Sorenson, O.: Venture capital, entrepreneurship and economic growth. Rev. Econ. Stat. 93(1), 338–349 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Glaeser, E., Kerr, W.: Local industrial conditions and entrepreneurship: how much of the spatial distribution can we explain? J. Econ. Manage. Strategy 18(3), 623–663 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kahn, C.B., Martin, J.K., Mehta, A.: City of Ideas: Reinventing Boston’s Innovation Economy: The Boston Indicators Report 2012. The Boston Foundation, Boston (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Katz, B., Wagner, J.: The Rise of Innovation District: A New Geography of Innovation in America. Brookings Institution, Washington (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bevilacqua, L., Pizzimenti, P., Maione, C. (eds.): S3 Cluster Policy & Spatial Planning. Research Report, MAPS-LED project, EU Horizon 2020, Marie Sklodowska-Curie RISE (2017). http://www.cluds-7fp.unirc.it/. Accessed 4 Mar 2018

  30. Lorenzen, M.: Social capital and localised learning: proximity and place in technological and institutional dynamics. Urban Stud. 44(4), 799–817 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Capello, R., Kroll, H.: From theory to practice in smart specialisation strategy: emerging limits and possible future trajectories. Eur. Plan. Stud. 24(8), 1393–1406 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Becattini, G.: La coscienza dei luoghi. Il territorio come soggetto corale. Donzelli Editore, Roma (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Katz, B., Vey, J., Wagner, J.: One year after: observations on the rise of innovation districts. Brookings Institute (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is related to the dissemination of the EU research project ‘MAPS-LED’ (Multidisciplinary Approach to Plan Specialization Strategies for Local Economic Development), Horizon 2020, Marie Sklodowska-Curie RISE, 2015-2019. The text is an author’s personal evolution of his previous paper “What Interpretations for Smart Specialisation Strategies in European Urban Regions? Lessons from the Boston Area”. In Bisello A., Vettorato D., Laconte P., Costa S. (Eds. 2018), Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions, Springer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sapienza University of Rome, 00185, Rome, Italy

    Bruno Monardo

Authors
  1. Bruno Monardo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Monardo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, Reggio Calabria, Italy

    Francesco Calabrò

  2. Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, Reggio Calabria, Italy

    Lucia Della Spina

  3. University of Reggio Calabria, Reggio Calabria, Italy

    Carmelina Bevilacqua

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Monardo, B. (2019). Innovation Districts as Turbines of Smart Strategy Policies in US and EU. Boston and Barcelona Experience. In: Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L., Bevilacqua, C. (eds) New Metropolitan Perspectives. ISHT 2018. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 100. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92099-3_38

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation