Skip to main content

Some Remarks on a Phenomenological Interpretation of Saramago’s Cave

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Saramago’s Philosophical Heritage
  • 217 Accesses

Abstract

José Saramago’s novel The Cave recruits the well-known Platonic image in order to describe the totalitarian power of our capitalistic society and the human efforts to fight back. This chapter compares Saramago’s novel with some of the most significant twentieth-century interpretations of the Platonic allegory of the cave, namely, those by Martin Heidegger, Eugen Fink, Jan Patočka, Hannah Arendt and Adriana Cavarero. The broader phenomenological framework within which Saramago’s novel can be examined includes many issues, from the space for tactile and bodily knowledge, man’s freedom and responsibility and the relationship between reality and the virtuality of experience. In The Cave, Saramago somehow reverses Plato’s original myth, develops some of its implicit strands and creates a new model for collective imagination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Platonic image has been traditionally translated and understood as myth, fable, simile, allegory, picture, and so forth. The German philosopher Martin Heidegger, for example, refers to a Gleichnis as Sinnbild: the English translator renders Heidegger’s Sinnbild as “sensory image, of sort that provides a hint or clue” (Heidegger 2002, p. 12). It is worth pointing out that in his Republic, Plato refers to the status of the cave as “this image … we must apply” (Plato 1970, 517b). It deals with a προσαπτέα εἰκών that Plato does not seem to consider a ὑπόνοια, the Platonic term for allegory.

  2. 2.

    See, for example, Andrew Laird (2003) and Begoña Ortega Villaro (2002).

  3. 3.

    “[A] carousel of horses, a carousel of space rockets, a centre for toddlers, a centre for the Third Age, a tunnel of love, a suspension bridge, a ghost train, an astrologer’s tent, a betting shop, a rifle range, a golf course, a luxury hospital … rain, wind and snow on demand, a wall of china, a Taj Mahal, an Egyptian pyramid, a temple of Karnak, a real aqueduct that works twenty-four hours a day … a lake … a Trojan horse, an electric chair, a firing squad … a list of prodigies so long that not even eighty years of leisure time would be enough to take them all in, even if you had been born in the Centre and had never left it for the outside world” (CV 259).

  4. 4.

    Arendt (1978, pp. 79–85) maintains instead that the philosopher is dead in the eyes of the people because he has left the real world after contemplating ideas. He is a living dead waiting to leave that human world.

Works Cited

  • Arendt, Hannah. 1961. Between Past and Future: Six Exercises in Political Thought. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1978. The Life of the Mind. Ed. Mary McCarthy, 2 Vols. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baptista-Bastos, Armando. 1996. José Saramago. Aproximação a um retrato. Lisboa: Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenberg, Hans. 1989. Höhlenausgänge. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrelli, Francesca. 2014. Tutti i personaggi agli ordini della mia volontà. Dialogo con José Saramago. http://www.leparoleelecose.it/?p=15247i. Accessed 2 Aug 2017.

  • Cavarero, Adriana. 1999. Note arendtiane sulla Caverna di Platone. In Hannah Arendt, ed. Simona Forti, 60–83. Bruno Mondadori: Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1993. Memoirs of the Blind: The Self-Portrait and Other Ruins. Trans. Pascale-Anne Brault and Michael Naas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, John N. 1966. The Discipline of the Cave. London/New York: Allen & Unwin/Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1967. The Transcendence of the Cave. London/New York: Allen & Unwin/Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, Eugen. 1966. Studien zur Phänomenologie, 1930–1939. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin. 2002. The Essence of Truth: On Plato’s Cave Allegory and Theaetetus. Trans. Ted Sadler. London/New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, Andrew. 2003. Death, Politics, Vision, and Fiction in Plato’s Cave (After Saramago). Arion: A Journal of Humanities and the Classics 10 (3): 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega Villaro, Begoña. 2002. La Caverna de Saramago. In La recepción del mito clásico en la literatura y el pensamiento, ed. Aurelia Ruiz Sola and Begoña Ortega Villaro, 325–340. Burgos: UNiversidad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patočka Jan. 1996. Heretical Essays in the Philosophy of History. Trans Erazim Kohák, ed James Dodd. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Plato and Europe. Trans Petr Lom. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. 1970. Republic. Trans. Paul Shorey. Loeb Classical Library. London/Cambridge, MA: William Heinemann/Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saramago, José. 2001. Saramago: la letteratura ci salva dalla società delle illusioni. Interview with Paolo Di Stefano. Corriere della Sera, January 22. p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Menditto, G. (2018). Some Remarks on a Phenomenological Interpretation of Saramago’s Cave. In: Salzani, C., Vanhoutte, K. (eds) Saramago’s Philosophical Heritage. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91923-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics