Skip to main content

Italian Gambling Regulation: Justifications and Counter-Arguments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gambling Policies in European Welfare States

Part of the book series: Work and Welfare in Europe ((RECOWE))

Abstract

With an expenditure of about 96 billion euros in 2016, Italy is one of the world’s biggest gambling markets, where electronic gambling machines are the major source of revenue. Based on an analysis of the legislation and open-ended interviews with key informants and beneficiaries of funding from the gambling industry, the chapter analyses the gambling regulatory model and the history of Italian legislation. The aim is to shed light on the process which led to the astonishing market expansion that began in the 90s. Furthermore, it presents the positions taken by the main actors and the conflicts between them—in particular between local administrations and central government—and discusses scholars’ main counter-arguments to the legislator’s justifications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AAMS. (2016). Il gioco legale in Italia: sintesi anni 2006–2016 [Legal gambling in Italy, 2006–2016 summary]. https://www.agenziadoganemonopoli.gov.it/portale/documents/20182/164375/dati+gioco+legale+2006-16.pdf/66aee373-6952-4c14-b25d-0f71e4ed8605.

  • AAMS. (2017). Organizzazione, attività, statistica. Anno 2016 [Organisation, activities, statistics. 2016]. https://www.agenziadoganemonopoli.gov.it/portale/documents/20182/536133/Finale.pdf/be930354-13d9-46b9-958b-69eb128a1869.

  • Anti-Mafia Commission. (2016). Relazione sulle infiltrazioni mafiose e criminali nel gioco lecito e illecito [Report on mafia and criminal infiltration into legal and illegal gambling]. Document XXIII No. 18, XVII Legislature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumberg, B., Cuzzocrea, V., Morini, S., Ortoleva, P., Disley, E., Tzvetkova, M., et al. (2014). Corporate social responsibility. ALICE RAP project, Deliverable 11.2, Work Package 11. http://www.alicerap.it.

  • Beckert, J., & Lutter, M. (2009). The inequality of fair play: Lottery gambling and social stratification in Germany. European Sociological Review, 25(4), 475–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonfiglioli, A. (2014). La normativa italiana in materia di gioco d’azzardo: un commento, in Cipolla (a cura di), Le implicazioni sociali del gioco d’azzardo. Il caso dell’Emilia Romagna (pp. 33–43). [Italian legislation on gambling: A commentary. In Cipolla (Ed.), Social implications of gambling. The Emilia-Romagna case]. Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, Y., Jo, H., & Pan, C. (2012). Doing well while doing bad? CSR in controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(4), 467–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croce, M., Lavanco, G., Varveri, L., & Fiasco, M. (2009). Italy. In G. Meyer, T. Hayer, & M. Griffiths (Eds.), Problem gambling in Europe. Challenges, prevention and interventions (pp. 153–171). New York: Springer Science and Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decreto-legge 25 settembre 2008, n. 149. Disposizioni urgenti per assicurare adempimenti comunitari in materia di giochi [Urgent provisions to ensure EU compliance with regard to games].

    Google Scholar 

  • Decreto-legge 28 aprile 2009, n. 39. Interventi urgenti in favore delle popolazioni colpite dagli eventi sismici nella regione Abruzzo nel mese di aprile 2009 e ulteriori interventi urgenti di protezione civile [Urgent measures in favour of the populations affected by earthquakes in the Abruzzo region in April 2009 and further urgent civil protection interventions].

    Google Scholar 

  • Decreto-legge 6 luglio 2011, n. 98. Disposizioni urgenti per la stabilizzazione finanziaria [Urgent provisions for financial stabilisation].

    Google Scholar 

  • Decreto-legge 13 settembre 2012, n. 158. Disposizioni urgenti per promuovere lo sviluppo del Paese mediante un più alto livello di tutela della salute [Urgent provisions to promote the development of the country through a higher level of health protection].

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Antidrug Policies. (2015). Relazione annuale al Parlamento 2015. Contributi e approfondimenti [2015 Annual Report to Parliament. Contributions and insights]. http://www.politicheantidroga.it/media/752340/contributi%20e%20approfondimenti.pdf.

  • Department for Antidrug Policies. (2016). Relazione annuale al Parlamento 2016 sullo stato delle tossicodipendenze in Italia 2016 [2016 Annual Report to Parliament].

    Google Scholar 

  • Directive 123/2006/ CE on Services in the Internal Market Point of Single Contact.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dotti, M. (2013). Slot City, Brianza-Milano e ritorno [Slot City, Brianza-Milano round trip]. Roma: Round Robin Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federserd (2015). Position paper di FeDerSerD sul gioco d’azzardo [Federserd position paper on gambling]. Document available on the Federserd official website at http://www.federserd.it/documenti/2015_Position_paper2.pdf.

  • Fiasco, M. (2009). Il gioco d’azzardo pubblico in Italia. In D. Capitanucci (a cura di): Il gioco d’azzardo in Italia. I dati e la ricerca [Public gambling in Italy. In D. Capitanucci (Ed.), Gambling in Italy. Data and research], Animazione Sociale, 8–9, 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiasco, M. (2010). Breve storia del gioco in Italia: tre epoche per tre strategie [Brief history of gambling in Italy: Three periods for three strategies]. Narcomafie, 9(10), 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiasco, M. (2011). L’azzardo di Stato sarà la nostra bolla, in AAVV: Ma a che gioco giochiamo? Il gioco d’azzardo da problema sociale e di dipendenza, a interessi economici, politici e criminali [State gambling will be our bubble. In Sundry Authors: What’s the game? Gambling from social problem and addiction to economic, political and criminal interests]. Centro Sociale Papa Giovanni XXVIII.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiasco, M. (2014a, September 29). Se l’azzardo sponsorizza il sociale [If gambling sponsors welfare]. Redattore sociale. http://www.redattoresociale.it/Notiziario/Articolo/469224/Se-l-azzardo-sponsorizza-il-sociale-13-milioni-da-Sisal-e-Lottomatica.

  • Fiasco, M. (Ed.). (2014b). Il gioco d’azzardo e le sue conseguenze sulla società italiana. La presenza della criminalità nel mercato dell’alea [The consequences of gambling on Italian society. The presence of criminality in the gambling market]. Research Report of the National Anti-usury Council Giovanni Paolo II onlus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiasco, M. (2014c). Misure e proposte per la regolamentazione del gioco d’azzardo [Measures and suggestions for gambling regulation]. Lesson on YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlD1qXf14YY.

  • Gandolfo, A., & De Bonis, V. (2013). Il modello italiano di tassazione del gioco d’azzardo: linee guida di politica fiscale per lo “sviluppo sostenibile” di un mercato importante e controverso [The Italian gambling taxation system: Fiscal policy guidelines for the sustainable development of an important and controversial market]. Discussion Papers of the Economy and Management Department, Università di Pisa, No. 173. http://www.dse.ec.unipi.it/index.php?id=52.

  • Grun, L., & McKeigue, P. (2000). Prevalence of excessive gambling before and after introduction of a national lottery in the United Kingdom: Another example of the single distribution theory. Addiction, 95(6), 959–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, L., Schellinck, T., & Schrans, T. (2008). Gambling and corporate social responsibility (CSR): Re-defining industry and state roles on duty of care, host responsibility and risk management. Policy and Society, 27(1), 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IGT. (2015). Ahead of the game. Sustainability Report 2015. http://media.igt.com/_dev/sustainability/files/assets/common/downloads/IGT_Sustainability_Report%202015_2709_h0840_GRI.pdf.

  • Jarre, P. (2016). Azzardo: le limitazioni imposte dagli enti locali all’invasione degli apparecchi automatici di gioco [Gambling: Limitations placed by municipalities against the invasion of automatic gambling machines]. Medicina delle Dipendenze, 21, 31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judgment of the Court of 6 November 2003. Criminal proceedings against Piergiorgio Gambelli and others. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62001CJ0243.

  • Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 March 2007. Criminal proceedings against Massimiliano Placanica (C-338/04), Christian Palazzese (C-359/04) and Angelo Sorricchio (C-360/04). http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?language=en&num=C-338/04.

  • Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber), 16 February 2012. Criminal proceedings against Marcello Costa and Ugo Cifone. http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?language=en&num=C-72/10.

  • Legge 16 marzo 1987, n. 123. Disposizioni per il personale dell’Amministrazione autonoma dei monopoli di Stato e per l’Amministrazione finanziaria [Provisions for the personnel of the Autonomous Administration of State Monopolies and for the Financial Administration].

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge 6 ottobre 1995, n. 425. Modifiche all’articolo 110 del testo unico delle leggi di pubblica sicurezza, approvato con regio decreto 18 giugno 1931, n. 773, concernente le caratteristiche degli apparecchi e congegni automatici, semiautomatici ed elettronici da trattenimento e da gioco di abilità e degli apparecchi adibiti alla piccola distribuzione [Amendments to article 110 of the consolidated law of public security, approved by royal decree 18 June 1931, n. 773, concerning the characteristics of automatic, semiautomatic and electronic devices for gambling and devices for small scale distribution].

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge 4 agosto 2006, n. 248. Conversione in legge, con modificazioni, del decreto-legge 4 luglio 2006, n. 223, recante disposizioni urgenti per il rilancio economico e sociale, per il contenimento e la razionalizzazione della spesa pubblica, nonché interventi in materia di entrate e di contrasto all’evasione fiscale. [Conversion into law, with amendments, of the decree-law 4 July 2006, n. 223, containing urgent provisions for economic and social recovery, for the containment and rationalization of public spending, as well as interventions on revenue and the fight against tax evasion].

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge 13 dicembre 2010, n. 220. Disposizioni per la formazione del bilancio annuale e pluriennale dello Stato (legge di stabilità 2011) [Provisions for the setting of the annual and multi-annual state budget (2011 stability law)].

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, C., & Adams, P. (2015). Clear ethical principles are needed for integrity in gambling research. Addiction, 111, 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni, M. (2014). The “banker” state and the “responsible” enterprises. Capital conversion strategies in the field of public legal gambling, Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 1, 71–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelligra, V. (2017). Tutte le bufale dei fan del gambling [All the gambling fans’ howlers]. Vita, 3, 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Planzer, S. (2014). Empirical views on European gambling law and addiction. Studies in European economic law and regulation. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regione Piemonte. Legge regionale 2 maggio 2016, n. 9. Norme per la prevenzione e il contrasto alla diffusione del gioco d’azzardo patologico [Rules for the prevention and the opposition to the diffusion of pathological gambling].

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolando, S., & Scavarda, A. (2016). ITALIAN REPORT. Gambling policy in European welfare regimes. A European research project on the profitability of gambling. Publications of the Faculty of Social Sciences n. 30, University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarti, S., & Triventi, S. (2012). Il gioco d’azzardo: l’iniquità di una tassa volontaria. La relazione tra posizione socio-economica e propensione al gioco [Gambling: the inequity of a voluntary tax. The relationship between socio-economic position and propensity to gamble]. Stato e mercato, 96, 503–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisal. (2016). Sustainability Report 2015. http://www.sisal.com/eng/sustainability/social-report.

  • Sulkunen, P., Babor, T., Cisneros-Örnberg, J., Egerer, M., Hellman, M., Livingstone, C., et al. (2018). Setting limits: Gambling, science and public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. J., Rehm, J., & Stevens R. (2011). The social and economic impacts of gambling. Final Report prepared for the Canadian Consortium for Gambling Research. https://www.uleth.ca/dspace/bitstream/handle/10133/1286/SEIG_FINAL_REPORT_2011.pdf.

  • Yani-de-Soriano, M. Y., Javed, U., & Youfsafzai, S. (2012). Can an industry be socially responsible if its products harm consumers? The Case of Online Gambling, Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4), 481–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavattiero, C. (2010). Lo Stato bisca [The gambling house state]. Milano: Ponte alle Grazie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenaro, G. (2006). Gioco d’azzardo e criminalità. Uno studio introduttivo sugli aspetti criminologici e sulle problematiche trattamentali del giocatore d’azzardo patologico in esecuzione di pena [Gambling and criminality. An introductory study of the criminological aspects and the treatment problems of the pathological gambler during the execution of the sentence]. Rassegna penitenziaria e criminological, 79.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Declaration of Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Rolando .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rolando, S., Scavarda, A. (2018). Italian Gambling Regulation: Justifications and Counter-Arguments. In: Egerer, M., Marionneau, V., Nikkinen, J. (eds) Gambling Policies in European Welfare States . Work and Welfare in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90620-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90620-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90619-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90620-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics