Skip to main content

Characterization and Character Engagement in the Documentary

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cognitive Theory and Documentary Film

Abstract

When documentaries represent people, they do not offer a transparent record of “who they really are,” but rather a constructed representation: in other words, a characterization. Such characterizations are not merely fictions, however. Documentary characterization implies specific ethical responsibilities to the people thus represented, precisely because documentaries are nonfiction. This chapter discusses the seeming paradox that the representation of people in documentaries is both constructed and nonfictional, and discusses the implications of considering documentaries as “asserted veridical representations.” It describes the most salient tools used by documentary filmmakers to construct characters, and the ethical obligations such characterization implies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Balász, B. (1999) “The Close-Up,” in Mast, G., Cohen, M. and Braudy, L. (eds.) Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings. 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 306–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, D. (2008) Poetics of Cinema. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, N. (1983) “From Real to Reel: Entangled in the Nonfiction Film,” Philosophic Exchange, 14, pp. 5–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York, Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grindon, L. (2007) “Q&A: Poetics of the Documentary Film Interview.” Velvet Light Trap: A Critical Journal of Film and Television, 60, pp. 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrasio, J. (2014) “9 Filmmakers Tell Us What Make the Perfect Documentary Character,” Tribecca Film Institute [Online]. Available at: https://tribecafilminstitute.org/blog/detail/9_filmmakers_tell_us_what_makes_the_perfect_documentary_character (Accessed: January 27, 2017).

  • Moyers, B. (1989) “Bill Moyers Interviews Errol Morris on ‘The Thin Blue Line’,” Public Broadcasting System [Online]. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OU4HG2QAIrI (Accessed: August 4, 2017).

  • Nichols, B. (1991) Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, B. (2017) “Letter to Errol Morris: Feelings of Revulsion and the Limits of Academic Discourse,” in LaRocca, D. (ed.) The Philosophy of Documentary Film: Image, Sound, Fiction, Truth. Lanham: Lexington Books, pp. 453–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, C. (1997) Rhetoric and Representation in Nonfiction Film. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, C. (2005) “What a Documentary Is, After All,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 63(2), pp. 105–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, C. (2008) “Caracterización y ética en el género documental.” Translated by María Calzada and Irene De Higes Andino. Archivos de la Filmoteca, 57–58(1), pp. 46–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, C. (2009) Moving Viewers: American Film and the Spectator’s Experience. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, C. (2017) “The Limits of Appropriation: Subjectivist Accounts of the Fiction/Nonfiction Distinction,” in LaRocca, D. (ed.) The Philosophy of Documentary Film: Image, Sound, Fiction, Truth. Lanham: Lexington Books, pp. 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (1995) Engaging Characters: Fiction, Emotion, and the Cinema. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, B. (1988) “The Tradition of the Victim in Griersonian Documentary,” in Rosenthal, A. (ed.) New Challenges for Documentary. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 269–287.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Some paragraphs in this chapter are taken from an earlier work (Plantinga 2008). The author would like to thank the editors for their insightful comments on an earlier version of this contribution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carl Plantinga .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Plantinga, C. (2018). Characterization and Character Engagement in the Documentary. In: Brylla, C., Kramer, M. (eds) Cognitive Theory and Documentary Film. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90332-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics