Skip to main content

The Practice of Urbanism: Civic Engagement and Collaboration by Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Bottom-Up Urbanism

Abstract

This chapter describes urbanism as a social activity that balances individual desires and political and institutional contexts. The author argues for the design charrette as a design process that both reconfigures the professional division of labor and engages stakeholders prior to the formulation of design solutions and plans. The common understanding of the charrette as public participation represents an underestimation of its potential and its significance. Underlying charrette practice is the idea that good urbanism—that is, urbanism that reflects and contributes to the quality of community life—is necessarily the work of many hands, over time. This chapter explores what can be learned from charrettes with regard to the intersection of technical expertise, democratic political processes and the emergence of new forms of place-making practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Explication of the logic of the charrette process and its efficacy is based on the author’s research on the New Urbanist movement, involving observation of charrettes, and interviews with participants and practitioners. What began in 1998 as participant observation and interviews of New Urbanist practitioners became focused more generally on varieties of public process in planning. The original research was funded by a fellowship from the National Endowment of the Humanities, and a grant from the Graham Foundation.

  2. 2.

    Seaside’s early form-based code is a single sheet of diagrams that focus on building typology and the way buildings define a public realm. The effect of the code is to guide each new contributor to the town as they realize whatever individual aspiration they bring to it. It outlines a few simple responsibilities to the common world that anyone choosing to build a house in the community is expected to take on. See discussion of the evolution of the plan and the Seaside code, by Andrés Duany and others, pp. 165–207 in Thadani (2013).

  3. 3.

    This conception of the urban commons goes beyond merely the idea of the “right to the city” as manifested in the occupation of public space (Kohn 2016), to the idea of the public realm as constituted by the qualities of connection through a shared commitment to a common environment.

  4. 4.

    The concept of “situated knowledge” was introduced into science and technology studies by Donna Harraway. Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.

  5. 5.

    For the purposes of this chapter, the NCI model provides a schematic framework of something like a typical charrette process, from pre-charrette to charrette, from charrette to implementation. However, it is recognized that the NCI model is an ideal-typical construction, defined in large part as part of an educational curriculum intended to help improve the practice of charrettes. It is rare for charrettes to follow the NCI model fully, and this is not to imply that the NCI model is by any means the only way to accomplish this sort of design-centered collaboration. It is used here to illuminate what are arguably key aspects of the process. The conclusions drawn here are derived from the author’s observations of charrettes and analysis of the logic of the process in terms of its sociological properties.

References

  • Alexander, C. (1987). A new theory of urban design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., & Angel, S. (1977). Pattern language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augé, M. (1995). Non-places: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). Social space and symbolic power. In In other words: Essays towards a reflexive sociology (pp. 123–139). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1992). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brain, D. (1994). Cultural production as ‘society in the making’. In D. Crane (Ed.), The sociology of culture: Emerging perspectives (pp. 191–220). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brain, D. (2008). Beyond the neighborhood: New urbanism as civic renewal. In T. Haas (Ed.), New urbanism and beyond: Designing cities for the future (pp. 249–254). New York: Rizzoli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., & Barthe, Y. (2001). Acting in an uncertain world: An essay in technical democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congress for the New Urbanism. (1999). The charter of the new urbanism. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M. (2008). The current state of everyday urbanism. In J. Chase, M. Crawford, & J. Kaliski (Eds.), Everyday urbanism (pp. 13–15). New York: Monacelli Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duany, A., & Brain, D. (2005). Regulating as if humans matter: The transect and post-suburban planning. In E. Ben-Joseph & T. S. Szold (Eds.), Regulating place: Standards and the shaping of urban America (pp. 293–332). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duany, A., Plater-Zyberk, E., & Speck, J. (2000). Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream. New York: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, R. (1995). Rebuilding the inner city: A history of neighborhood initiatives to address poverty in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy: Americans’ belief about how government should work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaliski, J. (2008). The present city and the practice of city design. In J. Chase, M. Crawford, & J. Kaliski (Eds.), Everyday urbanism (pp. 88–109). New York: Monacelli Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, P. (1994). The new urbanism: Toward an architecture of community. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelbaugh, D. 2007. Toward an integrated paradigm: Further thoughts on the three urbanisms. Places, 19(2). Permalink: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/25d4w94az.

  • Kirschenblatt-Gimblatt, B. (2008). Performing the city: Reflections on the urban vernacular. In J. Chase, M. Crawford, & J. Kaliski (Eds.), Everyday urbanism (pp. 19–21). New York: Monacelli Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, M. (2016). The death and life of the urban commonwealth. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kretzmann, J. P., & McKnight, J. L. (1993). Building communities from the inside out: A path toward finding and mobilizing a community’s assets. Chicago: ACTA Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krier, L. (1998). Architecture: Choice or fate. Windsor, UK: Andreas Papadakis Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology, building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225–258). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennertz, W., & Lutzenheiser, A. (2014). The charrette handbook: The essential guide to design-based public involvement. Chicago: APA Planner’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levebvre, H. (1991). The social production of space. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J., & Molotch, H. (1987). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lydon, M., & Garcia, A. (2015). Tactical urbanism: Short-term action for long-term change. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D., & Denton, N. (1997). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehaffey, M., & Alexander, C. (2016). A city is not a tree: 50th anniversary edition. Portland, OR: Sustasis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukerji, C. (1997). Territorial ambitions and the Gardens of Versailles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parolek, D., Parolek, K., & Crawford, P. C. (2008). Form-based codes: A guide for planners, urban designers, municipalities, and developers. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Salingaros, N., Brain, D., Duany, A., Mehaffy, M., & Philibert-Petit, E. (2006). Social housing in Latin America. In The future of cities. Solingen: Umbau Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (2013). The great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1999, November). Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 603–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. (1996). Democracy’s discontent: America in search of a public philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirianni, C., & Friedland, L. (2001). Civic innovation and American politics. In Civic innovation in America: Community empowerment, public policy and the movement for civic renewal (pp. 1–34). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitte, C. (1979). The art of building cities: City building according to its artistic fundamentals. New York: Hyperion Press. (Originally published in 1889.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, L. E., & Cruikshank, J. (2006). Breaking Robert’s rules: The new way to run your meeting, build consensus, and get results. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thadani, D. A. (2013). Visions of seaside. New York: Rizzoli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. M. (1983). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brain, D. (2019). The Practice of Urbanism: Civic Engagement and Collaboration by Design. In: Arefi, M., Kickert, C. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Bottom-Up Urbanism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90131-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90131-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90130-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90131-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics