Skip to main content

Abstract

Simulation-based optimization problems are often an inherent part in engineering design tasks. This paper introduces one such use case, the design of a box-type boom of a crane, which requires a time consuming structural analysis for validation. To overcome high runtimes for optimization approaches with numerous calls to the structural analysis tool, we here present several ways of approximating the structural analysis results using surrogate models. Results show a strong correlation between certain statics input and output parameters, and that various surrogate modeling approaches yield similar results in terms of accuracy and impact of the predictors on the output. The box-type boom use case together with the surrogate models shall serve as an industrial optimization benchmark for comparing various algorithms on this simulation-based optimization problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Affenzeller M, Wagner S (2005) Offspring selection: a new self-adaptive selection scheme for genetic algorithms. In: Ribeiro DB, Albrecht DRF, Dobnikar DA, Pearson DDW, Steele DNC (eds) Adaptive and natural computing algorithms. Springer, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Affenzeller M, Winkler SM, Kronberger G, Kommenda M, Burlacu B, Wagner S (2014) Gaining deeper insights in symbolic regression. In: Genetic programming theory and practice XI. Springer, Berlin, pp 175–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Affenzeller M, Beham A, Vonolfen S, Pitzer E, Winkler SM, Hutterer S, Kommenda M, Kofler M, Kronberger G, Wagner S (2015) Simulation-based optimization with HeuristicLab: practical guidelines and real-world applications. In: Applied simulation and optimization. Springer International Publishing, New York, pp 3–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop C (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K (2010) Optimization for engineering design: algorithms and examples, 11th edn. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester AI, Keane AJ (2009) Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 45(1):50–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank G, Entner D, Prante T, Khachatouri V, Schwarz M (2014) Towards a generic framework of engineering design automation for creating complex CAD models. Int J Adv Syst Meas 7(1 and 2):179–192

    Google Scholar 

  • HeuristicLab. http://dev.heuristiclab.com/. Accessed 03 Dec 2017

  • Hornby GS (2006) Alps: the age-layered population structure for reducing the problem of premature convergence. In: Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation. ACM, New York, pp 815–822

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubka V, Eder EW (1987) A scientific approach to engineering design. Des Stud 8(3):123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kommenda M, Kronberger G, Winkler S, Affenzeller M, Wagner S (2013) Effects of constant optimization by nonlinear least squares minimization in symbolic regression. In: Proceedings of the 15th annual conference companion on Genetic and evolutionary computation. ACM, New York, pp 1121–1128

    Google Scholar 

  • Koza JR (1992) Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection. MIT press, Cambridge, MA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmnn A, O’Rourke N, Hatcher L, Stepanski E (2005) JMP for basic univariate and multivariate statistics: a step-by-step guide, 1st edn. SAS Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebherr-Werk Nenzing GmbH. http://www.liebherr.com/en-GB/35267.wfw. Accessed 06 Mar 2017

  • Ragsdell KM, Phillips DT (1976) Optimal design of a class of welded structures using geometric programming. J Eng Ind 98(3):1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy R, Hinduja S, Teti R (2008) Recent advances in engineering design optimisation: challenges and future trends. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 57(2):697–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandgren E (1988) Nonlinear integer and discrete programming in mechanical design. In: Proceedings of the ASME design technology conference

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner S, Kronberger G, Beham A, Kommenda M, Scheibenpflug A, Pitzer E, Vonolfen S, Kofler M, Winkler S, Dorfer V, Affenzeller M (2014) Architecture and design of the HeuristicLab optimization environment. In: Advanced methods and applications in computational intelligence, No. 6 in topics in intelligent engineering and informatics. Springer International Publishing, New York, pp 197–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang GG, Shan S (2007) Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization. J Mech Des 129(4):370–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang LL (2014) Product configuration: a review of the state-of-the-art and future research. Int J Prod Res 52(21):6381

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out within the COMET K-Project #843551 “Advanced Engineering Design Automation (AEDA)” and the COMET K-Project #843532 “Heuristic Optimization in Production and Logistics (HOPL)”, both funded by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency FFG.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philipp Fleck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fleck, P. et al. (2019). Box-Type Boom Design Using Surrogate Modeling: Introducing an Industrial Optimization Benchmark. In: Andrés-Pérez, E., González, L., Periaux, J., Gauger, N., Quagliarella, D., Giannakoglou, K. (eds) Evolutionary and Deterministic Methods for Design Optimization and Control With Applications to Industrial and Societal Problems. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 49. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89890-2_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89890-2_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89889-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89890-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics