Abstract
Simulation-based optimization problems are often an inherent part in engineering design tasks. This paper introduces one such use case, the design of a box-type boom of a crane, which requires a time consuming structural analysis for validation. To overcome high runtimes for optimization approaches with numerous calls to the structural analysis tool, we here present several ways of approximating the structural analysis results using surrogate models. Results show a strong correlation between certain statics input and output parameters, and that various surrogate modeling approaches yield similar results in terms of accuracy and impact of the predictors on the output. The box-type boom use case together with the surrogate models shall serve as an industrial optimization benchmark for comparing various algorithms on this simulation-based optimization problem.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Affenzeller M, Wagner S (2005) Offspring selection: a new self-adaptive selection scheme for genetic algorithms. In: Ribeiro DB, Albrecht DRF, Dobnikar DA, Pearson DDW, Steele DNC (eds) Adaptive and natural computing algorithms. Springer, Vienna
Affenzeller M, Winkler SM, Kronberger G, Kommenda M, Burlacu B, Wagner S (2014) Gaining deeper insights in symbolic regression. In: Genetic programming theory and practice XI. Springer, Berlin, pp 175–190
Affenzeller M, Beham A, Vonolfen S, Pitzer E, Winkler SM, Hutterer S, Kommenda M, Kofler M, Kronberger G, Wagner S (2015) Simulation-based optimization with HeuristicLab: practical guidelines and real-world applications. In: Applied simulation and optimization. Springer International Publishing, New York, pp 3–38
Bishop C (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer, Berlin
Deb K (2010) Optimization for engineering design: algorithms and examples, 11th edn. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi
Forrester AI, Keane AJ (2009) Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 45(1):50–79
Frank G, Entner D, Prante T, Khachatouri V, Schwarz M (2014) Towards a generic framework of engineering design automation for creating complex CAD models. Int J Adv Syst Meas 7(1 and 2):179–192
HeuristicLab. http://dev.heuristiclab.com/. Accessed 03 Dec 2017
Hornby GS (2006) Alps: the age-layered population structure for reducing the problem of premature convergence. In: Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation. ACM, New York, pp 815–822
Hubka V, Eder EW (1987) A scientific approach to engineering design. Des Stud 8(3):123
Kommenda M, Kronberger G, Winkler S, Affenzeller M, Wagner S (2013) Effects of constant optimization by nonlinear least squares minimization in symbolic regression. In: Proceedings of the 15th annual conference companion on Genetic and evolutionary computation. ACM, New York, pp 1121–1128
Koza JR (1992) Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection. MIT press, Cambridge, MA
Lehmnn A, O’Rourke N, Hatcher L, Stepanski E (2005) JMP for basic univariate and multivariate statistics: a step-by-step guide, 1st edn. SAS Institute
Liebherr-Werk Nenzing GmbH. http://www.liebherr.com/en-GB/35267.wfw. Accessed 06 Mar 2017
Ragsdell KM, Phillips DT (1976) Optimal design of a class of welded structures using geometric programming. J Eng Ind 98(3):1021
Roy R, Hinduja S, Teti R (2008) Recent advances in engineering design optimisation: challenges and future trends. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 57(2):697–715
Sandgren E (1988) Nonlinear integer and discrete programming in mechanical design. In: Proceedings of the ASME design technology conference
Wagner S, Kronberger G, Beham A, Kommenda M, Scheibenpflug A, Pitzer E, Vonolfen S, Kofler M, Winkler S, Dorfer V, Affenzeller M (2014) Architecture and design of the HeuristicLab optimization environment. In: Advanced methods and applications in computational intelligence, No. 6 in topics in intelligent engineering and informatics. Springer International Publishing, New York, pp 197–261
Wang GG, Shan S (2007) Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization. J Mech Des 129(4):370–380
Zhang LL (2014) Product configuration: a review of the state-of-the-art and future research. Int J Prod Res 52(21):6381
Acknowledgements
This work was carried out within the COMET K-Project #843551 “Advanced Engineering Design Automation (AEDA)” and the COMET K-Project #843532 “Heuristic Optimization in Production and Logistics (HOPL)”, both funded by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency FFG.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fleck, P. et al. (2019). Box-Type Boom Design Using Surrogate Modeling: Introducing an Industrial Optimization Benchmark. In: Andrés-Pérez, E., González, L., Periaux, J., Gauger, N., Quagliarella, D., Giannakoglou, K. (eds) Evolutionary and Deterministic Methods for Design Optimization and Control With Applications to Industrial and Societal Problems. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 49. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89890-2_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89890-2_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89889-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89890-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)