Abstract
Despite numerous reforms and the introduction of automatic or semi-automatic adjustment mechanisms, pension system future solvency is not guaranteed. Then, setting up an automatic balancing mechanism can offer several advantages. This article proposes to detail the specific properties of various adjustment rules prevailing in different countries to see to what extent their understanding may be helpful to determine public choices ensuring sustainable retirement systems. Several of such adjustment rules are possible. Three rules will get our attention. The American case is radical. The prohibition to resort to public debt, the so-called “fiscal cliff”, forces the balance by a drastic reduction of pensions whenever the reserve fund is exhausted. The underlying idea is that this socially unacceptable perspective will force the parliament to take measures to restore solvency. The Swedish approach relies on an adjustment through the general level of pensions to guarantee a notional asset/liability ratio. A huge reserve fund smooths the shock associated with the aging of the population. The Canadian approach is based on an “inadequate rate provision” which increases the contribution rate and a pension freeze as long as the federal and provincial finance ministers do not reach an agreement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aaron, F.J.: Social security reconsidered. Natl Tax J. 64(2, Part 1), 385–414 (2011)
Settergren, O.: The Automatic Balance Mechanism of the Swedish Pension System. Working paper, National Social Insurance Board (2001)
Ménard, J.-C., Billig, A.: Intergenerational Balance of the Canadian Retirement Income System. Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, Canada (2013)
Sakamoto, J.: Automatic Balancing Mechanisms. PBSS colloquium in Lyon. June (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gannon, F., Legros, F., Touzé, V. (2018). Automatic Balancing Mechanisms in Practice: What Lessons for Pension Policy Makers?. In: Corazza, M., Durbán, M., Grané, A., Perna, C., Sibillo, M. (eds) Mathematical and Statistical Methods for Actuarial Sciences and Finance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89824-7_66
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89824-7_66
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89823-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89824-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)