Skip to main content

Abstract

The world is ageing rapidly. The percentage of older people (aged 60 years and over) worldwide increased from 9.2 % in 1990 to 11.7 % in 2013, and will reach 21.1 % by 2050 (Wound Management in An $18.5 billion+ worldwide market in 2021, 2015 [1]). That means the number of elderly is expected to more than double, from 841 million people in 2013 to more than 2 billion in 2050 (Fig. 1a). The ageing is connected strongly with the higher incidence of wounds. Exponential growth of older people is, therefore, parallel, followed by exponential growth of the wound management market (Fig. 1b).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wound Management: An $18.5 billion+ worldwide market in 2021. 2015. [Available from: http://blog.mediligence.com/2013/06/10/wound-management-an-18-5-billion-worldwide-market-in-2021/, 2 Feb 2018].

  2. Boateng JS, Matthews KH, Stevens HNE, Eccleston GM. Wound healing dressings and drug delivery systems: a review. J Pharm Sci. 2008;97(8):2892–923.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vowden K, Vowden P. Wound dressings: principles and practice. Surgery (Oxford). 2014;32(9):462–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Powers JG, Higham C, Broussard K, Phillips TJ. Wound healing and treating wounds: chronic wound care and management. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74(4):607–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pivec T, Peršin Z, Kolar M, Maver T, Dobaj A, Vesel A, et al. Modification of cellulose non-woven substrates for preparation of modern wound dressings. Text Res J. 2013;84(1):96–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Landriscina A, Rosen J, Friedman AJ. Systematic approach to wound dressings. J Drugs Dermatol. 2015;14(7):740–4.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rembe JD, Bohm JK, Fromm-Dornieden C, Schafer N, Maegele M, Frohlich M, et al. Comparison of hemostatic dressings for superficial wounds using a new spectrophotometric coagulation assay. J Transl Med. 2015;13:375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Abdelrahman TNH. Wound dressings: principles and practice. Surgery (Oxford). 2011;29(10):491–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin L, Wilson CG, Koosha F, Tetley L, Gray AI, Senel S, et al. The release of model macromolecules may be controlled by the hydrophobicity of palmitoyl glycol chitosan hydrogels. J Controlled Release. 2002;80(1–3):87–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Thomas S: Wounds and wound healing. In: Thomas S, editor. Wounds management and dressings. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 1990. p. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ausili E, Paolucci V, Triarico S, Maestrini C, Murolo D, Focarelli B, et al. Treatment of pressure sores in spina bifida patients with calcium alginate and foam dressings. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013;17(12):1642–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Barrett S. Mepitel® One: a wound contact layer with Safetac® technology. Br J Nurs. 2012;21(21):1271–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Benbow M. Urgotul: alternative to conventional non-adherence dressings. Br J Nurs. 2002;11(2):135–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kennedy-Evans KL. An innovative solution for skin tears: a case study. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2004;50(2):9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  15. National Institute for Clinical E.: Guidance on the use of debriding agents and specialist wound care clinics for difficult to heal surgical wounds. National Institute for Clinical Excellence; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  16. White R. Evidence for atraumatic soft silicone dressing use. Wounds UK. 2005;1(3):104–9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Meuleneire F. A case study evaluation of Safetac dressings used for paediatric wounds. Wounds UK. 2009;5(2):12–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sood A, Granick MS, Tomaselli NL. Wound dressings and comparative effectiveness data. Adv Wound Care Adv Wound Care. 2014;3(8):511–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dhivya S, Padma VV, Santhini E. Wound dressings—a review. Biomedicine (Taipei). 2015;5(4):22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tina Maver .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Maver, T., Maver, U., Pivec, T., Kurečič, M., Persin, Z., Stana Kleinschek, K. (2018). Advanced Wound Care. In: Bioactive Polysaccharide Materials for Modern Wound Healing. SpringerBriefs in Molecular Science(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89608-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics