Skip to main content

Participation in Argumentation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Inside the Mathematics Class

Part of the book series: Advances in Mathematics Education ((AME))

Abstract

This paper presents a classroom episode where it becomes visible how critical participation in mathematical argumentation can be. Basil Bernstein’s conceptualization of pedagogic rights and their interpretation by Straehler-Pohl & Sertl sets the scene and the context in which we look at a classroom episode. We then analyse this episode from two complementary sociological approaches to shed light on participation in collective argumentation in the mathematics class: (1) Götz Krummheuer’s interaction-theory based approach whose analyses rely on Goffman’s idea of a decomposition of speaker roles; (2) our own approach based on Jürgen Habermas’ works on communicative action, and discourse ethics. This allows us to understand the complexity and relevance of classroom discourse for students’ experiences of pedagogic rights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Apel, K.-O. (1976). Sprechakttheorie und transzendentale Sprachpragmatik zur Frage ethischer Normen. In K.-O. Apel (Ed.), Sprachpragmatik und Philosophie (pp. 10–173). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (Revised ed.). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J. (2016). Designing mathematics classes to promote equity and engagement. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 172–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., & Bauersfeld, H. (Eds.). (1995). The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, J. C. (2014). Using Habermas to explain why logical games foster argumentation. Proceedings from PME 38, Vancouver, Canada, Vol. 2, pp. 345–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, J. C. (2015). Argumentation below expectation: A double-threefold Habermas explanation. In K. Krainer & N. Vondrová (Eds.), Proceedings of CERME 9 (pp. 114–120). Prague: Czech Republic Accessed 15 Sep 2017 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, P. (1998). The sociology of mathematics education: Mathematical myths/pedagogic texts. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frandji, D., & Vitale, P. (2015). The enigma of Bernstein’s ‘pedagogic rights’. In P. Vitale & B. Exley (Eds.), Pedagogic rights and democratic education: Bernsteinian explorations of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment (pp. 13–32). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1981). Footing. Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1961). 3: Pädagogischer „Optimismus“ vor Gericht einer pessimistischen Anthropologie. In Kleine politische Schriften (I–IV. 1981) (pp. 58–100). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1972). Wahrheitstheorien. In Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns (pp. 127–183). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (Vol. I). Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knipping, C. (2012). „Find the rule“. Zur Entstehung von Leistungsdisparitäten zu Schuljahresbeginn. In U. Gellert & M. Sertl (Eds.), Zur Soziologie des Unterrichts. Arbeiten mit Basil Bernsteins Theorie des pädagogischen Diskurses (pp. 223–239). Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knipping, C., & Reid, D. (2013). Revealing structures of argumentations in classroom proving processes. In A. Aberdein & I. J. Dove (Eds.), The argument of mathematics (pp. 119–146). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Knipping, C., & Reid, D. (2015). Reconstructing argumentation structures: A perspective on proving processes in secondary mathematics classroom interactions. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education (pp. 75–101). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krummheuer, G. (2011). Representation of the notion “learning-as-participation” in everyday situations of mathematics classes. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik (ZDM), 43(1/2), 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krummheuer, G. (2015). Methods for reconstructing processes of argumentation and participation in primary mathematics classroom interaction. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education (pp. 51–74). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krummheuer, G., & Brandt, B. (2001). Paraphrase und Traduktion. Partizipationstheoretische Elemente einer Interaktionstheorie des Mathematiklernens in der Grundschule. Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 29–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. C. (1988). Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman’s participation framework. In P. Drew & A. Wootton (Eds.), Goffman: Exploring the interaction order (pp. 161–227). Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, D. A., & Knipping, C. (2010). Proof in mathematics education. In Research, learning and teaching. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Veith, H. (2014). Die Schule als Ort kommunikativen Handelns. In J. Hagedorn (Ed.), Jugend, Schule und Identität: Selbstwerdung und Identitätskonstruktion im Kontext Schule (pp. 125–140). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenny Christine Cramer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cramer, J.C., Knipping, C. (2018). Participation in Argumentation. In: Gellert, U., Knipping, C., Straehler-Pohl, H. (eds) Inside the Mathematics Class. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79045-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79045-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-79044-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-79045-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics