Skip to main content

Might We Learn from Learning?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Persuasive Technology (PERSUASIVE 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10809))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Theories on learning are vast, however constructivist learning in particular holds potential to strengthen designer’s ability to tailor design solutions, by directing specific attention towards the user’s ability to process the persuasive intent as mediated through technology. In this paper, we provide a brief introduction to Piaget’s learning theory, and argue towards the potential of considering learning a theoretical benchmark for persuasive design practitioners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Spahn, A.: And lead us (not) into persuasion…? Persuasive technology and the ethics of communication. Sci. Eng. Ethics 18(4), 633–650 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Lucero, A., Zuloaga, R., Mota, S., Muñoz, F.: Persuasive technologies in education: improving motivation to read and write for children. In: IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A.W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3962, pp. 142–153. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11755494_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Müller, L., Rivera-Pelayo, V., Heuer, S.: Persuasion and reflective learning: closing the feedback loop. In: Bang, M., Ragnemalm, E.L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7284, pp. 133–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31037-9_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Gram-Hansen, S.B., Ryberg, T.: Acttention – influencing communities of practice with persuasive learning designs. In: MacTavish, T., Basapur, S. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9072, pp. 184–195. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Fogg, B.: Persuasive Technology Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Kaufmann Publishers, Morgan (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miller, G.R.: On Being Persuaded, Some Basic Distinctions. In: Dillard, J.P., Pfau, M. (eds.) The Persuasion Handbook, Developments in Theory and Practice. Saga Publications, London (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Illeris, K.: How We Learn - Learning and Non-learning in School and Beyond. Routledge, Abingdon (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gram-Hansen, S.B., Ryberg, T.: Persuasion, learning and context adaptation. Spec. Issue Int. J. Concept. Struct. Smart Appl. 1, 28–37 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kinneavy, J.L.: Kairos in classical and modern rhetorical theory. In: Sipiora, P., Baumlin, J.S. (eds.) Rhetoric and Kairos, Essays in History, Theory and Practice. State University of New York Press, Albany (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Piaget, J.: The Psychology of Intelligence. Routledge, London, GBR (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. O’Keefe, D.J.: The elaboration likelihood model. In: Dillard, J.P., Shen, L. (eds.) The Persuasion Handbook. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson, E.J., et al.: Beyond nudges: tools of a choice architecture. Mark. Lett. 23(2), 487–504 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fogg, B.: A behaviour model for persuasive design. In: Persuasive 2009. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kjær Christensen, A.K., Hasle, P.F.V.: Classical rhetoric and a limit to persuasion. In: de Kort, Y., IJsselsteijn, W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., Fogg, B.J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4744, pp. 307–310. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77006-0_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Pertou, M., Iversen, S.D.: Persuasive Design i Retorisk Perspektiv. Rhetor. Scand. 46, 15 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ehninger, D.: Contemporary Rhetoric: A Reader’s Coursebook. Scott Foresman and Company, Glenview (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Glud, L.N., Jespersen, J.L.: Conceptual analysis of Kairos for location-based mobile devices. Series A, Research Papers. Department of Information Processing Science, University of Oulu, pp. 17–21 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Burri Gram-Hansen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gram-Hansen, S.B. (2018). Might We Learn from Learning?. In: Ham, J., Karapanos, E., Morita, P., Burns, C. (eds) Persuasive Technology. PERSUASIVE 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10809. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78978-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78978-1_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78977-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78978-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics