Abstract
The most important factor for the successful treatment with dental implants is the bone that has adequate height, width, and vitality . Some factors can lead to the loss of the bone such as genetic defect, trauma, tumor, and infection. In this situation the clinician must decide the right technique and material for bone reconstruction prior to insertion of dental implants.
Autogenous bone is still considered the gold standard in dental implantology. Combinations of autogenous bone and bone substitute material are now widely used in this field with great number of success. In this chapter principle in bone augmentation including the material of choice, technique, and surgical principle will be discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cawood JI, Stoelinga PJ. International research group on reconstructive preprosthetic surgery. Consensus report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;29:159.
Cawood JI, Howell RA. A classification of the edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;17:232.
Neukam FW, Hausamen JE, Scheller H. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Implantologie beim älteren Patienten. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z. 1989;44:490.
de-Freitas NR, Lima LB, de-Moura MB, Veloso-Guedes CC, Simamoto-Júnior PC, de-Magalhães D. Bisphosphonate treatment and dental implants: A systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016;21(5):e644–51.
Khoury F, Hidajat H. Extensive autogenous bone augmentation and implantation in patients under bisphosphonate treatment: a 15 case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016;36(1):9–18.
Chen ST, Buser D. Implants in post extraction sites. Literature update. In: Buser D, Belser U, Wismeijer D, editors. ITI treatment guide, vol. 3. Basel: ITI; 2008. p. 9–16.
Deporter D, Watson P, Pharoah M, Todescan R, Tomlinson G. Ten year result of a prospective study using porous surfaced dental implants and a mandibular overdenture. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2002;4:183–9.
Fugazotto PA. Shorter implants in clinical practice: rationale and treatments results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:487–96.
Misch CE, Steignga J, Barboza E, Misch Dietsh F, Cianciola LJ, Kazor C. Short dental implants in posterior partial edentulism: a multicenter retrospective 6 year case series study. J Periodontol. 2006;77:1340–7.
Feldman S, Boitel N, Weng D, Kohles SS, Stach RM. Five year survival distributions of short length (10 mm or less) machined surface and osseotite implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004;6:12–23.
Buser D, Dula K, Hirt HP, Belser U. Localized ridge augmentation with autograft and barrier membrane. Periodontol. 1999;19:151–63.
Buser D, Dula K, Belser U, Hirt HP, Berthold H. Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration. Surgical procedure in maxilla. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1993;13:29–45.
Isbaner J. Membranen in der zahnmedizin. Jahrb Implantol. 2016;2016:277.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Budihardja, A.S., Kallmann, M. (2019). Basic Principle in Bone Augmentation. In: Budihardja, A., Mücke, T. (eds) Bone Management in Dental Implantology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78951-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78951-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78950-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78951-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)