Skip to main content

Operationalizing Positive Peace: Canadian Approaches to International Security Policy and Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Global Approaches to Peace

Abstract

In the late twentieth century, changing conceptions of violence, coupled with an increased awareness of the risk of genocide and mass atrocities, caused a reconsideration of what armed conflict looked like and how the world should respond. The Government of Canada developed and promoted an orientation toward a broad definition of security as an extension of their existing approach to international engagement and foreign policy. Through support for international bodies such as the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty as well as the explicit incorporation of the concept of human security into the Canadian development and security strategies and support for the Responsibility to Protect, the Canadian government effectively promoted broad concepts of peace and security in the United Nations and internationally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acharya, A. (2001). Human Security: East Versus West. International Journal, 56(3), 442–460. https://doi.org/10.2307/40203577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, A., & Acharya, A. (2001). Human Security in Asia: Conceptual Ambiguities and Common Understandings. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Beyond the Washington Consensus-Governance and the Public Domain in Contrasting Economies: The Cases of India and Canada, Chandigarh (pp. 12–14).

    Google Scholar 

  • Annan, K. (1999, September 16). Two Concepts of Sovereignty. The Economist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annan, K. (2000). We the Peoples: The Role of the United Nations in the 21st Century. New York, NY: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axworthy, L. (1997). Canada and Human Security: The Need for Leadership. International Journal, 52(2), 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banda, M. (2007). The Responsibility to Protect: Moving the Agenda Forward. Ottawa, Canada: United Nations Association in Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. J. (2006). Whither the Responsibility to Protect? Humanitarian Intervention and the 2005 World Summit. Ethics & International Affairs, 20(2), 143–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2006.00012.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. J. (2008). Conflict Prevention and the Responsibility to Protect. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 14(2), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.5555/ggov.2008.14.2.135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. J. (2009). Responsibility to Protect: The Global Effort to End Mass Atrocities. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. J., & Drummond, C. (2011). The Responsibility to Protect in Southeast Asia: Between Non-interference and Sovereignty as Responsibility. The Pacific Review, 24(2), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2011.560958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, P. (2006). Canada and Human Security: From the Axworthy Doctrine to Middle Power Internationalism. American Review of Canadian Studies, 36(2), 233–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatz, W. E. (1966). Human Security: Some Reflections. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bosold, D., & Von Bredow, W. (2006). Human Security: A Radical or Rhetorical Shift in Canada’s Foreign Policy? International Journal, 61(4), 829–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosold, D., & Werthes, S. (2005). Human Security in Practice: Canadian and Japanese Experiences. Internationale Politik Und Gesellschaft, 1(2005), 84–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1979). Symbolic Power. Critique of Anthropology, 4(13–14), 77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capie, D. (2004). Between a Hegemon and a Hard Place: The ‘War on Terror’ and Southeast Asian–US Relations. The Pacific Review, 17(2), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951274042000219833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, C., Duygulu, S., Montgomery, A. H., & Rapp, A. (2014). Explaining the Advocacy Agenda: Insights from the Human Security Network. International Organization, 68(2), 449–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapnick, A. (2011). A Diplomatic Counter-Revolution: Conservative Foreign Policy, 2006–11 over the Transom. International Journal, 67(1), 137–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapnick, A., & Kukucha, C. J. (2016). Conservative Foreign Policy in the Harper era. In A. Chapnick & C. J. Kukucha (Eds.), The Harper Era in Canadian Foreign Policy: Parliament, Politics, and Canada’s Global Posture. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung-Gertler, J. H. (2007). A Model Power for a Troubled World—Canadian National Interests and Human Security in the 21st Century. International Journal, 62(3), 589–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christian Century Company. (1931). The Christian Century, 48, 483. Retrieved from: https://books.google.com/books?id=xJc5AQAAIAAJ&q=%22human+security%22+%22world+farm+problem%22&dq=%22human+security%22+%22world+farm+problem%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj-pZfxn5DbAhVJyYMKHYx-DL4Q6AEIKTAA.

  • Christiano, T. (2004). The Authority of Democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 12(3), 266–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cingranelli, D. L., & Richards, D. L. (1999). Respect for Human Rights After the End of the Cold War. Journal of Peace Research, 36(5), 511–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2004). Greed and Grievance in Civil War. Oxford Economic Papers, 56(4), 563–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CTVNews.ca. (2015, November 6). Trudeau Government Renames Key Departments. Retrieved from: http://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/trudeau-government-renames-key-departments-1.2646008.

  • Cushion, C., & Jones, R. L. (2006). Power, Discourse, and Symbolic Violence in Professional Youth Soccer: The Case of Albion Football Club. Sociology of Sport Journal, 23(2), 142–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daalder, I. H. (2001). Are the United States and Europe Heading for Divorce? International Affairs, 77(3), 553–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dallaire, R. (2004). Shake Hands with the Devil the Failure of Humanity in Rwanda. New York: Carroll & Graf.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFAIT. (1999). Human Security: Safety for People in a Changing World. Ottawa, Canada: Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (2016). Responsibility to Protect (R2P): The ICISS Commission Fifteen Years on (Simons Papers in Security and Development No. 54/2016). School for International Studies, Simon Fraser University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G., & Sahnoun, M. (2001). Intervention and State Sovereignty: Breaking New Ground. Global Governance, 7(2), 119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R. A. (1999). Kosovo, World Order, and the Future of International Law. The American Journal of International Law, 93(4), 847–857. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glennon, M. J. (2001). The Fog of Law: Self-Defense, Inherence, and Incoherence in Article 51 of the United Nations Charter Law and the War on Terrorism: Military Action against Terrorists Under International Law. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 25(2), 539–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect. (n.d.). About us. Retrieved from: http://www.globalr2p.org/about_us#history.

  • Government of Canada. (1995). Canada in the World: Government Statement. Ottawa: Government of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Canada. (2017, November 28). The Peace and Stabilization Operations Program. Retrieved from: http://international.gc.ca/world-monde/issues_development-enjeux_developpement/response_conflict-reponse_conflits/psop.aspx?lang=eng.

  • Grabosky, P. (2013). Organised Crime and the Internet. The RUSI Journal, 158(5), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2013.847707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, E. S., & Brodhead, F. (1984). Demonstration Elections: U.S.-Staged Elections in the Dominican Republic, Vietnam and El Salvador. Boston, MA: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herr, K., & Anderson, G. (2003). Violent Youth or Violent Schools? A Critical Incident Analysis of Symbolic Violence. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 6(4), 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, S. K. (2006). Canadian Foreign Policy: Defining the National Interest. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Security Centre. (2006). Human Security Report 2005: War and Peace in the 21st Century. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Security Report Project. (2013). Human Security Report 2013: The Decline in Global Violence: Evidence, Explanation, and Contestation. Vancouver: Human Security Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Security Research Group. (n.d.). Retrieved from: https://www.sfu.ca/internationalstudies/about/hsrg.html.

  • Human Security Unit. (2009). Human Security in Theory and Practice: An Overview of the Human Security Concept and the United Nations Trust Fund for Human Security. New York, NY: United Nations Trust Fund for Human Security.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, G. J. (2002). America’s Imperial Ambition. Foreign Affairs, 81(5), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/20033268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. (2001). The Responsibility to Protect. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessup, P. C. (1954). Should International Law Recognize an Intermediate Status Between Peace and War? The American Journal of International Law, 48(1), 98–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/2194736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jockel, J., & Sokolsky, J. (2000). Lloyd Axworthy’s Legacy: Human Security and the Rescue of Canadian Defence Policy. International Journal, 56(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/40203528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, M. (1999). New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamidohzono, S., Gómez, O., & Mine, Y. (2015). Embracing Human Security: New Directions of Japan’s ODA for the 21st Century (JICA-RI Working Paper No. 94). Tokyo: JICA Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, T., & Murray, R. W. (2014). Mutual Constitution or Convenient National Interest? The Security Strategies of Canada and the United States Since 1991. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 20(3), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/11926422.2014.977312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kikoler, N. (2009). Responsibility to Protect. In International Conference: Protecting People in Conflict and Crisis: Responding to the Challenges of a Changing World. Retrieved from: http://www.rsc.ox.ac.uk/files/publications/other/dp-responsibility-to-protect-2009.pdf.

  • Krause, K. (2008). Building the Agenda of Human Security: Policy and Practice Within the Human Security Network. International Social Science Journal, 59(s1), 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunz, J. L. (1947). Individual and Collective Self-Defense in Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations. The American Journal of International Law, 41(4), 872–879. https://doi.org/10.2307/2193095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck, E. C. (2011). The Responsibility to Protect: The First Decade. Global Responsibility to Protect, 3(4), 387–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M., & Owen, T. (2010). The Second Generation of Human Security: Lessons from the UN and EU Experience. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944–), 86(1), 211–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, A. (2004). Notes on ‘What Not to Wear’ and Post-feminist Symbolic Violence. The Sociological Review, 52(s2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00526.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moens, A. (2008). Afghanistan and the Revolution in Canadian Foreign Policy. International Journal, 63(3), 569–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, J., & Grada, C. Ó. (2002). What Do People Die of During Famines: The Great Irish Famine in Comparative Perspective. European Review of Economic History, 6(3), 339–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R. W., & McCoy, J. (2010). From Middle Power to Peacebuilder: The Use of the Canadian Forces in Modern Canadian Foreign Policy. American Review of Canadian Studies, 40(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/02722011003734712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, R. (2001). Human Security: Paradigm Shift or Hot Air? International Security, 26(2), 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remacle, E. (2008). Approaches to Human Security: Japan, Canada and Europe in Comparative Perspective. The Journal of Social Science, 66, 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard Nossal, K. (2013). The Use—And Misuse—of R2P: The Case of Canada. In A. Hehir & R. Murray (Eds.), Libya, the Responsibility to Protect, and the Future of Humanitarian Intervention (pp. 110–129). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roosevelt, F. D. (1941, January 6). 1941 State of the Union Address: The Four Freedoms. Retrieved from: http://voicesofdemocracy.umd.edu/fdr-the-four-freedoms-speech-text/.

  • Rudnytskyi, O., Levchuk, N., Wolowyna, O., Shevchuk, P., & Kovbasiuk, A. (2015). Demography of a Man-Made Human Catastrophe: The Case of Massive Famine in Ukraine 1932–1933. Canadian Studies in Population, 42(1–2), 53–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1979). Multiple Discovery and Invention: Zeitgeist, Genius, or Chance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(9), 1603–1616. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.9.1603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stairs, D. (1994). Will and Circumstance and the Postwar Study of Canada’s Foreign Policy. International Journal, 50(1), 9–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/40202995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suhrke, A. (1999). Human Security and the Interests of States. Security Dialogue, 30(3), 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, R. (2002). Outlook: Intervention, Sovereignty and the Responsibility to Protect: Experiences from ICISS. Security Dialogue, 33(3), 323–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, N., & Tow, W. T. (2002). The Utility of Human Security: Sovereignty and Humanitarian Intervention. Security Dialogue, 33(2), 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO MGIEP. (2017, October 6). “There Is No Peace Without Development and There Is No Development Without Peace”: Ms. Tawakkol Karman’s Ahinsa Lecture Highlights the Importance of Working Towards Building peace and Sustainable Development. Retrieved from: http://mgiep.unesco.org/there-is-no-peace-without-development-and-there-is-no-development-without-peace-ms-tawakkol-karmans-ahinsa-lecture-highlights-the-importance-of-working-towards-building-pe/.

  • U.N. General Assembly. (2005). 2005 World Summit Outcome. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. Charter of the United Nations (1945). Retrieved from: http://www.un.org/en/charter-united-nations/index.html.

  • United Nations Development Programme. (1994). Human Development Report 1994. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorster, H. H., & Kruger, A. (2007). Poverty, Malnutrition, Underdevelopment and Cardiovascular Disease: A South African Perspective: Review Article. Cardiovascular Journal of Africa, 18(5), 321–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedgwood, R. (1999). NATO’s Campaign in Yugoslavia. The American Journal of International Law, 93(4), 828–834. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T. G. (2006). R2P After 9/11 and the World Summit. Wisconsin International Law Journal, 24(3), 741–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, J., Thielking, C., & MacFarlane, S. N. (2002). The Responsibility to Protect: Assessing the Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. International Journal, 57(4), 489–512. https://doi.org/10.2307/40203689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, I. (2002). Writing the Wrongs of Past Interventions: A Review of the International Committee on Intervention and State Sovereignty. The International Journal of Human Rights, 6(3), 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. J. (1974). Should We Rediscover Blatz? Was His Psychology American, European or Uniquely Canadian? Canadian Psychologist/Psychologie Canadienne, 15(2), 140–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Conor Seyle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Seyle, D.C. (2019). Operationalizing Positive Peace: Canadian Approaches to International Security Policy and Practice. In: Kulnazarova, A., Popovski, V. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Global Approaches to Peace. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78905-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics