Skip to main content

Fixation vs. No Fixation in MIS Inguinal Hernia Repair

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The SAGES Manual of Hernia Surgery

Abstract

Fixation of mesh during minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair is a highly debated topic. The main reason to advocate for fixation is to prevent mesh migration, theoretically decreasing the likelihood of recurrence. The main argument against certain forms of fixation is a risk of acute pain and chronic pain due to fixation into muscles, nerves, and bone. Some surgeons advocate for no fixation at all, while those advocating fixation use many methods including absorbable and permanent forms of sutures, staples, and tacks applied to various structures within the posterior inguinal anatomy. Alternative to penetrating fixation such as surgical glue and self-fixating mesh is also being widely utilized, potentially changing if and how most surgeons fixate mesh in minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Phillips EH, Rosenthal R, Fallas M, et al. Reasons for early recurrence following laparoscopic hernioplasty. Surg Endosc. 1995;9(2):140–4; discussion 144–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Felix E, Scott S, Crafton B, et al. Causes of recurrence after laparoscopic hernioplasty. A multicenter study. Surg Endosc. 1998;12(3):226–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fischer JE. Fischer’s mastery of surgery. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Teng YJ, Pan SM, Liu YL, et al. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of fixation versus nonfixation of mesh in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(9):2849–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(1):CD001785.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Claus CM, Rocha GM, Campos AC, et al. Prospective, randomized and controlled study of mesh displacement after laparoscopic inguinal repair: fixation versus no fixation of mesh. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(3):1134–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Reynvoet E, Berrevoet F. Pros and cons of tacking in laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Technol Int. 2014;25:136–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Christoffersen MW, Brandt E, Helgstrand F, et al. Recurrence rate after absorbable tack fixation of mesh in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2015;102(5):541–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Spotnitz WD. Hemostats, sealants, and adhesives: a practical guide for the surgeon. Am Surg. 2012;78(12):1305–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sajid MS, Ladwa N, Kalra L, McFall M, Baig MK, Sains P. A meta-analysis examining the use of tacker mesh fixation versus glue mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2013;206(1):103–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chan MS, Teoh AY, Chan KW, Tang YC, Ng EK, Leong HT. Randomized double-blinded prospective trial of fibrin sealant spray versus mechanical stapling in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernioplasty. Ann Surg. 2014;259(3):432–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Antoniou SA, Kohler G, Antoniou GA, Muysoms FE, Pointner R, Granderath FA. Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing nonpenetrating vs mechanical mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2016;211(1):239–249.e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ismail A, Abushouk AI, Elmaraezy A, et al. Self-gripping versus sutured mesh fixation methods for open inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review of clinical trials and observational studies. Surgery. 2017;162(1):18–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cambal M, Zonca P, Hrbaty B. Comparison of self-gripping mesh with mesh fixation with fibrin-glue in laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP). Bratisl Lek Listy. 2012;113(2):103–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferrarese A, Bindi M, Rivelli M, Solej M, Enrico S, Martino V. Self-gripping mesh versus fibrin glue fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized prospective clinical trial in young and elderly patients. Open Med (Wars). 2016;11(1):497–508.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jackson TD, Wannares JJ, Lancaster RT, Rattner DW, Hutter MM. Does speed matter? The impact of operative time on outcome in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(7):2288–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bittner R, Montgomery MA, Arregui E, et al. Update of guidelines on laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia (International Endohernia Society). Surg Endosc. 2015;29(2):289–321.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Scott Davis Jr. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yheulon, C., Davis, S.S. (2019). Fixation vs. No Fixation in MIS Inguinal Hernia Repair. In: Davis, Jr., S., Dakin, G., Bates, A. (eds) The SAGES Manual of Hernia Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78411-3_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78411-3_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78410-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78411-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics