Skip to main content

Horizontal Stratification in Brazil’s Higher Education (1960–2010)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Paths of Inequality in Brazil

Abstract

Using census’ data from 1960 to 2010, the study focuses on the horizontal stratification in Brazil’s higher education – i.e., inequalities among sex and race groups which completed the superior level of schooling. Three major trends, not in the same direction, were detected. First, university access has been democratized, with an increase in the relative share of women, blacks, browns, and indigenous people. In the general population, 9.4% of the women and 7.2% of the men had a college degree in 2010. Whites were 95% of the college graduates in 1960; in 2010, they represent three out of four graduates – although whites are less than half the Brazilian population. Second, this inclusion does not imply equal access to all university careers; it took place more intensely in fields less valued by the labor market. Brazil has a stratification pattern similar to that of the United States: education, humanities, and health – with Medicine as an outlier – are fields with a larger concentration of women, while careers related to business, engineering, and technology attract more men. In terms of race, there is a higher concentration of brown and black people in careers in applied social sciences and humanities and especially in the field of Religion. Finally, inferential analysis revealed persistent wage inequalities. Women with university degrees still earn less than her male counterparts in the same career, despite the decrease in the wage gap. More dramatically, disadvantages related to race fluctuated but did not undergo significant changes throughout these decades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    These are the predominant paths; as stated by Lucas himself (2001, p. 1652), there is nothing that would prevent qualitative differences from being pursued even when universalization is not present.

  2. 2.

    The gender difference in mathematical skills is lower in countries where there are more equal opportunities for men and women. By conducting a review of the research in this field, Gerber and Cheung (2008, p. 312) concluded that there is no clarity as to which decisive mechanisms are responsible for these differences to emerge so early in the life of college students. So, more research is needed on this front.

References

  • Ayalon, H. (2003). Women and men go to university: Gender differences in choice of field in higher education. Sex Roles, 48, 277–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. P., & Jones, D. P. (1993). Creating gender equality: Cross-national gender stratification and mathematical performance. Sociology of Education, 66(2), 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beltrão, K. I., & Teixeira, M. de P. (2004). O vermelho e o negro: gênero na universidade brasileira – uma análise da seletividade das carreiras a partir dos Demographic Censuses de 1960 a 2000. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA (Texto para discussão, no. 1052).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1999). Escritos de educação (2ª ed). Petrópolis: Vozes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. 1992. A reprodução: elementos para uma teoria do sistema de ensino (3ª ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Francisco Alves.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, K. (2000). The incorporation of women into higher education: Paradoxical outcomes? Sociology of Education, 73(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brasil. (2011). Censo da Educação Superior (CES) de 2010. Resumo técnico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brasil. Bolsas ofertadas por ano. Disponível em: http://prouniportal.mec.gov.br/images/arquivos/pdf/Representacoes_graficas/bolsas_ofertadas_ano.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2013.

  • Brasil. Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira (INEP). (2009, September). Avaliando o desempenho no ENADE de bolsistas do ProUni. Na Medida, 1(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campante, F. R., Crespo, A. R. V., & Leite, P. G. (2004, June). Desigualdade salarial entre raças no mercado de trabalho urbano brasileiro: aspectos regionais. Revista Brasileira de Economia, Rio de Janeiro, 58(2). Available at: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71402004000200003&lng=en&nrm=iso. Accessed 27 Mar 2014. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-71402004000200003.

  • Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2002). Equal but separate? A cross-national study of sex segregation in higher education. American Sociological Review, 67(4), 573–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daymont, T. N., & Andrisani, P. J. (1984). Job preferences, college major, and the gender gap in earnings. Journal of Human Resources, 19, 408–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorentine, R. (1987). Men, women, and the premed persistence gap: A normative alternatives approach. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1118–1139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, T. P., & Cheung, S. Y. C. (2008). Horizontal stratification in postsecondary education: Forms, explanations, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 299–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grogger, J., & Eide, E. (1995). Changes in college skills and the rise in the college wage premium. Journal of Human Resources, 30, 280–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, M. (1989). Male-female wage differentials and policy responses. Journal of Economic Literature, 27, 46–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenbalg, C. (1979). Discriminação e desigualdades raciais no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Graal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson, J. (1999). Explaining sex differences in educational choice: An empirical assessment of a rational choice model. European Sociological Review, 15, 391–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karen, D. (1991). The politics of class, race and gender access to higher education in the United States, 1960–1986. American Journal of Education, 99, 208–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karen, D. (2001). Changes in access to higher education in the United States: 1980–1992. Sociology of Education, 75(3), 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, S. (2001). Effectively maintained inequality: Education transitions, track mobility, and social background effects. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1642–1690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marini, M. M., Fan, P., Finley, E., & Beutel, A. M. (1996). Gender and job values. Sociology of Education, 69(1), 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menezes-Filho, N. (2012, December). Apagão de mão de obra qualificada? As profissões e o mercado de trabalho brasileiro entre 2000 e 2010 (Policy Paper no. 4). São Paulo: Insper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paglin, M., & Rufolo, A. (1990). Heterogeneous human capital, occupational choice, and male-female earnings differences. Journal of Labor Economics, 8, 123–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, F., & Wotipka, C. M. (2001). Slowly but surely? The global expansion of women’s participation in Science and Engineering Fields of study, 1972–92. Sociology of Education, 74, 231–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis, M. R., & Crespo, A. R. V. (2005). Race discrimination in Brazil: An analysis of the age, period and cohort effects (Texto para Discussão IPEA, no. 1.114). Rio de Janeiro: IPEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soares, S. S. D. (2000). O perfil da discriminação no mercado de trabalho: homens negros, mulheres brancas e mulheres negras (Texto para Discussão IPEA, no. 769). Brasília: IPEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Werfhorst, H. G., & Kraykamp, G. (2001). Four field-related educational resources and their impact on labor, consumption and sociopolitical orientation. Sociology of Education, 74(4), 296–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Werfhorst, H. G. (2002). Fields of study, acquired skills, and the wage benefit from a matching job. Acta Sociol., 45(4), 287–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (2003). Women in Science: Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Antonio Costa Ribeiro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Costa Ribeiro, C.A., Schlegel, R. (2019). Horizontal Stratification in Brazil’s Higher Education (1960–2010). In: Arretche, M. (eds) Paths of Inequality in Brazil. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78184-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78184-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78183-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78184-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics