Skip to main content

The Unique Investment Risks of the Emerging Financial Markets

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Strategic Design and Innovative Thinking in Business Operations

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

  • 2301 Accesses

Abstract

The significance of the Emerging Financial Markets (EFMs) is on a steady rise. They offer significant advantages for international investors such as high yields and broader chance of global portfolio diversification. However, there exist unique risks of investments in EFMs that should be carefully observed. This article is a summary those risks such as the risk of survival bias, non-normality of returns, the peso problem, contagion issues, commodity and natural resource curse among other problems that investors should pay attention to in EFMs. At the end, a top-down analysis approach is recommended in this article to those investors who will invest in EFMs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “Emerging markets” is a term that The International Finance Corporation (IFC), a World Bank Group affiliate, began using in 1981 to describe a set of countries. Sometimes the term is used interchangeably with “emerging economies”. Although so close, emerging markets puts more emphasis on financial markets. When the term was first introduced into usage in early 1980s, The informal criterion for a developing country to be called as an emerging market economy was to have 30–50 listed companies with a market capitalization of $1 billion or more and an annual trading of $100 million or more. However, the two terms melted together over the years to become an inseparable alloy today. Influenced by the characterization of emerging economies by Julien Vercueil, today, it is widely believed that emerging economies share three common characteristics: (i) higher than less developed, less than developed economies per-capita income figures, (ii) high growth performance, (iii) economic liberalization and institutional transition. The big 10 emerging economies, as identified by Jeffrey E. Garten in 1998, a former Dean of the Yale School of Management and a former US Under Secretary of Commerce for International Trade, are Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Poland, South Africa, South Korea and Turkey. IMF additionally classifies Bangladesh, Bulgaria, Chile, Colombia, Hungary, Malaysia, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Romania, Russia, Thailand, Ukraine and Venezuela as emerging economies.

  2. 2.

    Sill, Keith, 2000, “Understanding Asset Values: Stock Prices, Exchange Rates, And the Peso Problem”, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Research Publication.

  3. 3.

    Rietz T.A., 1988, “The Equity Risk Premium: A Solution”, Journal of Monetary Economics.

  4. 4.

    Krasker W.S., 1980, “The ‘Peso Problem’ in Testing the Efficiency of Forward Exchange Markets”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 2, 269–276.

  5. 5.

    Lewis K. K., 1991, “Was There a ‘Peso Problem’ in the Term Structure of US Interest Rates: 1979–1982?”, International Economics, 32, 159–173.

  6. 6.

    For further discussion about the concept of national liquidity, see Hawkins and Turner (2000) on https://www.bis.org/publ/plcy08a.pdf

  7. 7.

    Cantor R., Packer F., 1996, “Determinants and Impact Sovereign Credit Ratings”, FRBNY Economic Policy Review, 37–53.

  8. 8.

    Erb C.B., Harvey C.R., Viskanta T.E., 1997, “Political Risk, Economic Risk and Financial Risk”, Financial Analysts Journal, 29–46.

  9. 9.

    For a good explanation about the post-2008 criticisms regarding the rating agencies on the two sides of the Atlantic, see Council on Foreign Relations article on https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/credit-rating-controversy

References

  • BIS 78th Annual Report. Bank for International Settlements. (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Calomaris, C. W., & Beim, D. O. (2001). Emerging financial markets. New York: McGraw Hill-Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, R., & Packer, F. (1996). Determinants and impact sovereign credit ratings. FRBNY Economic Policy Review, 2, 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council on Foreign Relations Web Article. (2015). The credit rating controversy. Retrieved August 2017, from https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/credit-rating-controversy

  • Erb, C. B., Harvey, C. R., & Viskanta, T. E. (1997). Political risk, economic risk and financial risk. Financial Anaylsts Journal, 52, 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garten, J. E. (1998). The big ten: The big emerging markets and how they will change our lives. New York: Basic Books (Reprinted Edition in April 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, C. R. (1995). Predictable risk and returns in emerging markets. The Review of Financial Studies, 8(3), 773–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J., & Turner, P. (2000). Managing foreign debt and liquidity risks in emerging economies: An overview. Managing Foreign Debt and Liquidity Risks: BIS Policy Papers No. 8, 3–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF Primary Commodity Price Indices. Retrieved August 2017., from http://www.imf.org/external/np/res/commod/Charts.pdf

  • Krasker, W. S. (1980). The ‘Peso Problem’ in testing the efficiency of forward exchange markets. Journal of Monetary Economics, (2), 269–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, K. K. (1991). Was there a ‘Peso Problem’ in the term structure of US interest rates: 1979–1982? International Economics, 32, 159–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meese, R., & Rogoff, K. (1983). Empirical exchange rate models of the seventies: Do they fit out of sample? Journal of International Economics, 14, 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menkhoff, L., Sarno, L., Schmeling, M., & Schrimpf, A. (2012). Carry trades and global foreign exchange volatility. The Journal of Finance, 67(2), 681–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rietz, T. A. (1988). The equity risk premium: A solution. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sill, K. (2000). Understanding asset values: Stock prices, exchange rates, and the peso problem. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Research Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söylemez, A. O., & Demirci, S. (2013). The nonlinear causality between the international capital flows and economic growth in Turkey. Finansal Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, 4(8), 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Totić, S., & Božović, M. (2015). Tail risk in emerging markets of Southeastern Europe. Applied Economics, 48, 1785–1798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vercueil, J. (2012). Les Pays Emergents. Brésil – Russie – Inde – Chine… Mutations Economiques et Nouveaux Défis (3rd edn., 232 p.). Paris: Bréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, J. (2017, July 26). Emerging market assets are trapped by An outdated Cliché. Financial Times.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arif Orçun Söylemez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Söylemez, A.O. (2018). The Unique Investment Risks of the Emerging Financial Markets. In: Dincer, H., Hacioglu, Ü., Yüksel, S. (eds) Strategic Design and Innovative Thinking in Business Operations. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77622-4_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics