Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Darkness in Janusian Thinking: Considering the Relationship Between Creativity in the Workplace and Employee Well-Being

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Creativity at Work

Abstract

How does employees’ creativity affect their well-being in the workplace? It has often been assumed that individual creativity has various positive benefits to the health and well-being of employees. However, we argue in this chapter that being creative in the workplace can have various negative influences on the well-being of employees as well. Specifically, we suggest that being creative in the workplace can also lead to negative outcomes such as depletion of personal resources, alienation, conflict, and the experience of personal grief in the case of failed creative efforts. This chapter makes an important contribution to the existing literature on the outcomes of employee creativity. Several managerial implications and suggestions for future research are also offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agars, M. D., Kaufman, J. C., & Locke, T. R. (2008). Social influence and creativity in organizations: A multi-level lens for theory, research, and practice. In Multi-level issues in creativity and innovation (pp. 3–61). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 367–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., Hadley, C. N., & Kramer, S. J. (2002). Creativity under the gun. Harvard Business Review, 80, 52–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N., De Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of organizational Behavior, 25(2), 147–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40, 1297–1333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, J. (2001). Grief from an evolutionary perspective. In M. S. Stroebe, R. O. Hansson, W. Stroebe, & H. Schut (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care (pp. 263–283). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, M. (2012). Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1102–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2013). Creativity and charisma among female leaders: The role of resources and work engagement. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 2760–2779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, J., & Kremen, A. M. (1996). IQ and ego-resiliency: Conceptual and empirical connections and separateness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolino, M., Valcea, S., & Harvey, J. (2010). Employee, manage thyself: The potentially negative implications of expecting employees to behave proactively. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 325–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cangiano, F., & Parker, S. K. (2016). Proactivity for mental health and well-being. In S. Clarke, T. M. Probst, F. W. Guldenmund, & J. Passmore (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of the psychology of occupational safety and workplace health (pp. 228–250). Malden, MA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiaburu, D. S., Diaz, I., & De Vos, A. (2013). Employee alienation: Relationships with careerism and career satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28, 4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T. (1993). Stress research and stress management: Putting theory to work (Vol. 61). Sudbury: HSE Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). 16 implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danna, K., & Griffin, R. W. (1999). Health and well-being in the workplace: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Management, 25, 357–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49, 14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edl, S., Benedek, M., Papousek, I., Weiss, E. M., & Fink, A. (2014). Creativity and the Stroop interference effect. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 38–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fay, D., & Sonnentag, S. (2012). Within-person fluctuations of proactive behavior: How affect and experienced competence regulate work behavior. Human Performance, 25, 72–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, D. P. (2005). Are some entrepreneurs more overconfident than others? Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 623–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furst, S. A., & Cable, D. M. (2008). Employee resistance to organizational change: Managerial influence tactics and leader-member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawke, J. C., Gorgievski, M. J., & Bakker, A. B. (2017). Employee intrapreneurship and work engagement: A latent change score approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 88–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M. (2007). Creativity in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 1, 439–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2002). Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don’t: The role of context and clarity of feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgsdottir, A. S., & Getz, I. (2004). How flexibility facilitates innovation and ways to manage it in organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13, 166–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, L. L. (2008). Why be creative: A review of the practical outcomes associated with creativity at the individual, group, and organizational levels. In J. Zhou & C. E. Shalley (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 303–322). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. (2004). A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams’ engagement in creative processes. Journal of Management, 30, 453–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gino, F., & Ariely, D. (2012). The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goncalo, J. A., & Staw, B. M. (2006). Individualism–collectivism and group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 96–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Y., Huang, J. C., & Farh, J. L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 765–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 3–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groth, J., & Peters, J. (1999). What blocks creativity? A managerial perspective. Creativity and Innovation Management, 8, 179–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillén, M. F. (2001). Is globalization civilizing, destructive or feeble? A critique of five key debates in the social science literature. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 235–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 90–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E., Johnson, R. J., Ennis, N., & Jackson, A. P. (2003). Resource loss, resource gain, and emotional outcomes among inner city women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Sirmon, D. G. (2003). A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management, 29, 963–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, K., Clark, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). Positive and negative creativity in groups, institutions, and organizations: A model and theoretical extension. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 211–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, O. (2004). How fairness perceptions make innovative behavior more or less stressful. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, O., Van de Vliert, E., & West, M. (2004). The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: A special issue introduction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 129–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1988). Three tiers for innovation research. Communication Research, 15, 509–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kéri, S. (2009). Genes for psychosis and creativity: A promoter polymorphism of the neuregulin 1 gene is related to creativity in people with high intellectual achievement. Psychological Science, 20, 1070–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T. Y., Hon, A. H., & Crant, J. M. (2009). Proactive personality, employee creativity, and newcomer outcomes: A longitudinal study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24, 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivimäki, M., Vahtera, J., Elovainio, M., Virtanen, M., & Siegrist, J. (2007). Effort-reward imbalance, procedural injustice and relational injustice as psychosocial predictors of health: Complementary or redundant models? Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 64, 659–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koen, P. A., Ajamian, G. M., Boyce, S., Clamen, A., Fisher, E., Fountoulakis, S., et al. (2002). Fuzzy front end: Effective methods, tools, and techniques. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landy, F. J., & Conte, J. M. (2016). Work in the 21st century, binder ready version: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. Freedom and Control in Modern Society, 18, 18–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiter, M. P., Maslach, C., & Frame, K. (2015). Burnout. In R. L. Cautin & S. O. Lilienfeld (Eds.), The encyclopedia of clinical psychology. West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leka, S., Griffiths, A., & Cox, T. (2003). Work organisation and stress. Systematic problem approaches for employers, managers and trade union representatives. Protecting Workers’ Health Series No. 3. Geneva: Word Health Organization

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, D., Chen, X. P., & Yao, X. (2011). From autonomy to creativity: A multilevel investigation of the mediating role of harmonious passion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthar, S. S. (2006). Resilience in development: A synthesis of research across five decades. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Risk, disorder, and adaptation (pp. 739–795). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäkikangas, A., Feldt, T., Kinnunen, U., & Mauno, S. (2013). Does personality matter? A review of individual differences in occupational well-being. In Advances in positive organizational psychology (pp. 107–143). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCraw, S., Parker, G., Fletcher, K., & Friend, P. (2013). Self-reported creativity in bipolar disorder: Prevalence, types and associated outcomes in mania versus hypomania. Journal of Affective Disorders, 151, 831–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, K. L., & Milkman, K. L. (2013). Looking up and looking out: Career mobility effects of demographic similarity among professionals. Organization Science, 24, 1041–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. G. (1999). Falling forward: Real options reasoning and entrepreneurial failure. Academy of Management review, 24, 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Fjeldstad, Ø. D., Miles, G., & Lettl, C. (2010). Designing organizations to meet 21st-century opportunities and challenges. Organizational Dynamics, 39, 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, J., & Tiwana, M. (1987). Personality and alienation of creative writers: A brief report. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. H., Webb, J. W., & Franklin, R. J. (2011). Understanding the manifestation of entrepreneurial orientation in the nonprofit context. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 947–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munt, D., & Hargreaves, J. (2009). Aesthetic, emotion and empathetic imagination: Beyond innovation to creativity in the health and social care workforce. Health Care Analysis, 17, 285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustafa, M., Martin, L., & Hughes, M. (2016). Psychological ownership, job satisfaction, and middle manager entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23, 272–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemiro, J. E. (2002). The creative process in virtual teams. Communication Research Journal, 14, 69–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S., McBride, A., & Larson, J. (1997). Rumination and psychological distress among bereaved partners. Journal of personality and social psychology, 72, 855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramey, C. H., & Weisberg, R. W. (2004). The “poetical activity” of Emily Dickinson: A further test of the hypothesis that affective disorders foster creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasulzada, F., & Dackert, I. (2009). Organizational creativity and innovation in relation to psychological well-being and organizational factors. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royer, I. (2003). Why bad projects are so hard to kill. Harvard Business Review, 81, 48–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salanova Soria, M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2004). El engagement de los empleados: Un reto emergente para la dirección de los recursos humanos. Revista de trabajo y Seguridad Social. Recursos humanos, 261, 109–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, cognition and personality, 9, 185–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheck, C. L., & Kinicki, A. J. (2000). Identifying the antecedents of coping with an organizational acquisition: A structural assessment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 627–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C. E., & Zhou, J. (2008). Organizational creativity research: A historical overview. In J. Zhou & C. E. Shalley (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 3–31). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D. A., & Kuratko, D. F. (2009). The death of an innovative project: How grief recovery enhances learning. Business Horizons, 52, 451–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, S. J., Kim, T. Y., Lee, J. Y., & Bian, L. (2012). Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: A cross-level interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 197–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2003). Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Academy of management Journal, 46, 703–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist, J. (2016). Stress in the workplace. In W. Cockerham (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to medical sociology (pp. 268–287). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T., et al. (1991). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R. J., & Jehng, J. C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology, 205, 163–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamper, C. L., & Masterson, S. S. (2002). Insider or outsider? How employee perceptions of insider status affect their work behavior. Journal of Organizational behavior, 23(8), 875–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, K., & Parker, S. K. (2014). Effective and sustained proactivity in the workplace: A self-determination theory perspective. In The Oxford handbook of work engagement, motivation, and self-determination theory (pp. 50–71). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, S. Y., & Choi, J. N. (2012). Effects of team knowledge management on the creativity and financial performance of organizational teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118, 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavares, S. M. (2016). How does creativity at work influence employee’s positive affect at work? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25, 525–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management journal, 45(6), 1137–1148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2004). The Pygmalion process and employee creativity. Journal of Management, 30, 413–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52, 591–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tummers, L., & Den Dulk, L. (2013). The effects of work alienation on organizational commitment, work effort and work-to-family enrichment. Journal of Nursing Management, 21, 850–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology, 51, 355–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, S. A., Mustafa, M. J., Anderson, N., & Sayer, B. (2018). Innovative work behavior and personality traits: Examining the moderating effects of organizational tenure. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33(1), 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, D. (2002). Emotion work and psychological well-being: A review of the literature and some conceptual considerations. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 237–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J. (1998). Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: Interactive effects on creative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J. (2003). When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: Role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 682–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., & Hoever, I. J. (2014). Research on workplace creativity: A review and redirection. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 1, 333–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. (2003). Research on employee creativity: A critical review and directions for future research. In J. Martocchio & G. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resource management. Oxford: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Semenyih, Malaysia

    Michael Mustafa & Hazel Melanie Ramos

Authors
  1. Michael Mustafa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hazel Melanie Ramos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Mustafa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom

    Lee Martin

  2. Department of Culture, Media & Creative Industries (CMCI), King’s College London, London, United Kingdom

    Nick Wilson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mustafa, M., Ramos, H.M. (2018). The Darkness in Janusian Thinking: Considering the Relationship Between Creativity in the Workplace and Employee Well-Being. In: Martin, L., Wilson, N. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Creativity at Work. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77350-6_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation