Abstract
Phenomena such as “small-world” and “six degrees of separation” reveal the connectivity between individuals that are seemingly unrelated in the society. Beyond merely connectivity, it has been shown in recent years that social contagion exists in online interactions. Along this line of investigation, we are interested in the subtle and invisible social influence on real-world behavior across offline communication networks. In particular, we study how social influence propagates and triggers behavioral change, and how such effect expands deeply across the social network in a way similar to the physical phenomenon of ripples across the water. To this end, we analyze a large-scale one-month international event in Andorra using nation-wide mobile phone data, and investigate the change in the likelihood of attending the event for people that have been influenced by and are of different social distances from the attendees. Our results suggest that social influence exhibits the ripple effect, decaying across social distances from the source but persisting up to six degrees of separation in the social network. We further show that such influence decays as communication delay increases and communication intensity decreases, and that it is stronger among people who are more explorative geographically. Our findings may have important implications in a number of domains, such as marketing, public health, and social mobilizations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Unobserved confounding variables are difficult to control for by using matching-based methods. To partly address the issue that tourists may travel together and social links may not pass social influence, we remove individual pairs who are potentially on the same trip to Andorra. This can be inferred based on whether individuals stay at the same hotel at the same night.
References
Anagnostopoulos A, Kumar R, Mahdian M (2008) Influence and correlation in social networks. In: 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, New York, pp 7–15
Aral S (2011) Commentary-identifying social influence: a comment on opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Mark Sci 30(2):217–223
Aral S (2012) Social science: poked to vote. Nature 489(7415):212–214
Aral S, Muchnik L, Sundararajan A (2009) Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(51):21544–21549
Backstrom L, Boldi P, Rosa M, Ugander J, Vigna S (2012) Four degrees of separation in Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM web science conference. ACM, New York, pp 33–42
Bond RM et al (2012) A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature 489(7415):295–298.
Christakis N, Fowler J (2009) Connected: the surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. Little Brown and Company, New York
Deville P et al (2016) Scaling identity connects human mobility and social interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113(26):201525443
Gleeson JP, Cellai D, Onnela JP, Porter MA, Reed-Tsochas F (2014) A simple generative model of collective online behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(29):10411–10415
Hill S, Provost F, Volinsky C (2006) Network-based marketing: Identifying likely adopters via consumer networks. Stat Sci 21(2):256–276
King G, Nielsen R (2016) Why propensity scores should not be used for matching
Leng Y, Rudolph L, Pentland A, Zhao J, Koutsopolous HN (2016) Managing travel demand: location recommendation for system efficiency based on mobile phone data. CoRR abs/1610.06825
Lobel I, Sadler E (2015) Preferences, homophily, and social learning. Oper Res 64(3):564–584
Milgram S (1967) The small world problem. Psychol Today 1(1):61–67
Miritello G, Moro E, Lara R (2011) Dynamical strength of social ties in information spreading. Phys Rev E 83(4):045102
Normand SLT et al (2001) Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: a matched analysis using propensity scores. J Clin Epidemiol 54(4):387–398
Onnela JP et al (2007) Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(18):7332–7336
Pickard G et al (2011) Time-critical social mobilization. Science 334:509–512
Rutherford A et al (2013) Limits of social mobilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(16): 6281–6286
Stuart EA (2010) Matching methods for causal inference: a review and a look forward. Stat Sci Rev J Inst Math Stat 25(1):1
Toole JL, Herrera-Yaqüe C, Schneider CM, González MC (2015) Coupling human mobility and social ties. J R Soc Interface 12(105):20141128
Toulis P, Kao EK (2013) Estimation of causal peer influence effects. ICML 28(3):1489–1497
Ugander J, Backstrom L, Marlow C, Kleinberg J (2012) Structural diversity in social contagion. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(16):5962–5966
Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684):440–442
VanderWeele TJ (2013) Inference for influence over multiple degrees of separation on a social network. Stat Med 32(4):591–596
Zhao J, Wu J, Xu K (2010) Weak ties: Subtle role of information diffusion in online social networks. Phys Rev E 82(1):016105
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leng, Y., Dong, X., Moro, E., Pentland, A.‘. (2018). The Rippling Effect of Social Influence via Phone Communication Network. In: Lehmann, S., Ahn, YY. (eds) Complex Spreading Phenomena in Social Systems. Computational Social Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77332-2_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77332-2_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77331-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77332-2
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)