Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conclusions and Issues for Future Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Collaborative Dynamic Capabilities for Service Innovation

  • 794 Accesses

Abstract

This final chapter provides a conclusion to the book and describes a number of future research issues. These include perspectives and new research implications on “collaborative dynamic capabilities and capabilities congruence,” “autopoiesis and strategic innovation capabilities,” “assets orchestration processes and micro strategy processes,” “sensing through boundaries vision,” and “asset orchestration process through paradoxical management.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There is not much accumulated research on paradoxical management that considers networks between organizations in terms of time variation. Ford and Bockoff presented a paradoxical perspective on synchronic and diachronic organizational dualities. If such paradoxes provide corporations the chance for innovation, the content and quality of innovation must greatly be influenced by the nature of the paradox. Therefore, it may become more and more important to perceive paradoxical phenomena constructively and positively, and understand them as being the motive power for the radical transformation of corporations (Kodama 2003, 2004).

References

  • Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Approach. Reading: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(3), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busoni, S., & Prencipe, A. (2001). Exploring the Links Between Products and Knowledge Dynamics. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 1019–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busoni, S., Prencipe, A., & Pvatt, K. (2001). Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 1185–1200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlile, P. (2004). Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felix, R. (2003). A Proposed Taxonomy of Management Systems. System Research and Behavioral Science, 20(1), 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, M. (2002). Transforming an Old Economy Company Through Strategic Communities. Long Range Planning, 35(4), 349–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, M. (2003). Strategic Innovation in Traditional Big Business. Organization Studies, 24(2), 235–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, M. (2004). Strategic Community-Based Theory of Firms: Case Study of Dialectical Management at NTT DoCoMo. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 21(6), 603–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, M. (2005a). Knowledge Creation Through Networked Strategic Communities: Case Studies on New Product Development in Japanese Companies. Long Range Planning, 38(1), 27–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, M. (2005b). How Two Japanese High-Tech Companies Achieved Rapid Innovation Via Strategic Community Networks. Strategy & Leadership, 33(6), 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, M. (2006). Knowledge-Based View of Corporate Strategy. Technovation, 26(12), 1390–1406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, M. (2007a). The Strategic Community-Based Firm. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, M. (2007b). Knowledge Innovation –Strategic Management as Practice. London: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, M. (2007c). Project-Based Organization in the Knowledge-Based Society. London: Imperial College Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, M. (2007d). Innovation and Knowledge Creation Through Leadership-Based Strategic Community: Case Study on High-Tech Company in Japan. Technovation, 27(3), 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, M. (2009a). Boundaries Innovation and Knowledge Integration in the Japanese Firm. Long Range Planning, 42(4), 463–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, M. (2009b). Innovation Networks in Knowledge-Based Firm –Developing ICT-Based Integrative Competences. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, M. (2011). Interactive Business Communities. London: Gower Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, M. (2014). Winning Through Boundaries Innovation –Communities of Boundaries Generate Convergence. Oxford: Peter Lang.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, M. (Ed.). (2015). Collaborative Innovation: Developing Health Support Ecosystems (Vol. 39). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, M. (2017a). Developing Holistic Leadership: A Source of Business Innovation. Bingley: Emerald.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, M. (2017b). Developing Strategic Innovation in Large Corporations – The Dynamic Capability View of the Firm. Knowledge and Process Management, 24(4), 221–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, M. (2018). Sustainable Growth Through Strategic Innovation: Driving Congruence in Capabilities. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, M., & Shibata, T. (2016). Developing Knowledge Convergence Through a Boundaries Vision – A Case Study of Fujifilm in Japan. Knowledge and Process Management, 23(4), 274–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Source of Innovation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, B., & March, J. B. (1988). Organization Learning. In W. R. Scott & J. Blake (Eds.), Annual Review of Sociology (pp. 319–340). Palo Alto: Annual Reviews.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1984). The Self-Description of Society: Crisis Fashion and Sociological Theory. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 25, 59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1990). Essays on Self-Reference. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1995). Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Problems in the Neurophysiology of Cognition. In Autopoiesis and Cognition (pp. 41–47). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1981). The Systematic Metaphor and Its Implications for Organizational Analysis. Organization Studies, 2, 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orton, J. D., & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 203–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. M., & Fenton, E. M. (Eds.). (2000). The Innovating Organization. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication (117p.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General System Theory. New York, 41973(1968), 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1982). Management of Organizational Change Among Loosely Coupled Elements. Change in Organizations, 375, 408.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nihon University, College of Commerce, Tokyo, Japan

    Mitsuru Kodama

Authors
  1. Mitsuru Kodama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitsuru Kodama .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Nihon University, College of Commerce, Tokyo, Japan

    Mitsuru Kodama

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kodama, M. (2018). Conclusions and Issues for Future Research. In: Kodama, M. (eds) Collaborative Dynamic Capabilities for Service Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77240-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation