Abstract
The late Doreen Massey, recently urged teachers to ‘take on the world’ (Massey in Geography 99(1):36–39, 2014). Though we may see the everyday world as a mosaic of different places, nations or regions defined by their boundaries, a global understanding brings different perspectives: of flows and networks and interdependencies. If we take this seriously—if we do take on the world—then young people need ideas in order to provide new ways of seeing and thinking. Geography in this sense, is a disciplinary resource that provides access to a particular form of powerful knowledge–– in short, the means to be able to ‘think geographically’. This chapter opens up and presents this argument. In the first part, we provide a platform in the form of analysis of geography curricula from three countries, identifying both the potentials and the challenges that teachers face. Where is ‘the global’? we ask, and in what ways do formal curriculum documents inspire or constrain us from ‘taking on the world’? The second part seeks to develop a disciplinary view of the school subject, appealing to the sometimes beguiling notion of powerful knowledge. We end by introducing a capabilities approach to thinking about the school subject, which demonstrates the responsibility that inevitably falls to well-prepared teachers to enact the curriculum.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AAG. (2013). An AAG companion website for understanding the changing planet. Retrieved from http://geographicadvantage.aag.org/.
Bednarz, S. (2004). US World geography textbooks: Their role in education reform. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 13(3), 223–239.
Brooks, C. (2016). Teacher subject identity in professional practice: Teaching with a professional compass. Abingdon: Routledge.
CDE. (2009). Colorado academic standards: Social studies. Retrieved from https://www.cde.state.co.us/cosocialstudies/cas-socialstudies-p12-pdf.
Chang, C. H. (2011). Is Singapore’s school geography relevant to our changing world? Research in Geography Education Online, 1(2), 141–157.
Curriculum Planning and Development Division. (2016). Lower secondary geography syllabus. Ministry of Education, Singapore. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/education/syllabuses/humanities/.
Dicken, P. (2004). Geographers and “globalisation”: (yet) Another missed boat. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29, 5–26.
DfE. (2013). National curriculum in England: Geography programmes of study. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-geography-programmes-of-study/national-curriculum-in-england-geography-programmes-of-study.
DfE. (2014). National curriculum in England: Framework for key stages 1 to 4. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-framework-for-key-stages-1-to-4/the-national-curriculum-in-england-framework-for-key-stages-1-to-4.
GA. (2015). Focus on global learning. Teaching Geography, 40(2).
Geography Education Standards Project. (1994). Geography for life: National geography standards. Washington DC: National Geographic Society Committee for Research and Exploration. Retrieved from http://www.nationalgeographic.com/xpeditions/standards/matrix.html.
Georgia Department of Education. (2016). Social studies Georgia standards of excellence. Retrieved from https://www.georgiastandards.org/Georgia-Standards/Documents/Social-Studies-8th-Grade-Georgia-Standards.pdf.
GLP. (2014). Global learning programme. Retrieved from http://glp.globaldimension.org.uk/.
GTAS. (2016). Geography Teachers’ Association of Singapore: About us. Retrieved from https://gtasg.wordpress.com/about/.
Hudson, B. (2016). Didactics. In D. Wyse, L. Hayward, & J. Pandya (Eds.), The sage handbook of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 107–124). London: Sage.
Irvine, K. (2015). Climate change and flood prediction in urban areas—Challenge of hitting a moving target? Geobuzz, 7–9.
Irvine, K., Chang, C. H., Chatterjee, K., Das, D., Sheng, W. B., & Seow, T. (2016). Greenspace and urban sustainable living. Geobuzz, 6–9.
Lambert, D. (2013). Geography in school and a curriculum of survival. Theory and Research in Education, 11(1), 85–98.
Lambert, D. (2016). Geography. In D. Wyse, L. Hayward, & J. Pandya (Eds.), The sage handbook of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 391–407). London: Sage.
Lambert, D., Solem, M., & Tani, S. (2015). Achieving human potential through geography education: A capabilities approach to curriculum making in schools. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(4), 723–735.
Marsden, B. (1997). On taking the geography out of geography education. Geography, 82(3), 241–252.
Massey, D. (2002). Globalisation: What does it mean for geography? Geography, 87(4), 293–296.
Massey, D. (2004). Geographies of responsibility. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 86(1), 5–18.
Massey, D. (2014). Taking on the world. Geography, 99(1), 36–39.
Maude, A. (2016). What might powerful geographical knowledge look like? Geography, 101(2), 70–76.
McDougall, W. A. (2015). Geography, history, and true education. Research in Geographic Education, 17(2), 10–89.
MOE. (2009). Desired outcomes of education. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/education/education-system/desired-outcomes-of-education.
MOE. (2015). 21st century competencies. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/education/education-system/21st-century-competencies.
NCSS. (2016). National curriculum standards for social studies: Introduction. Retrieved from http://www.socialstudies.org/standards/introduction.
Neo, H. (2014). From agricultural geography to food geographies: Trends and prospects. Geobuzz, 3–5.
O’Brien, K. L., & Leichenko, R. M. (2000). Double exposure: Assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization. Global Environmental Change, 10, 221–232.
O’Brien, K. L., & Leichenko, R. M. (2003). Winners and losers in the context of global change. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93, 89–103.
Rawling, E. (2015). Spotlight on … curriculum change and examination reform for geography 14–19. Geography, 100(3), 164–168.
Sassen, S. (1991). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Slater, F., Graves, N., & Lambert, D. (2016). Editorial. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 25(3), 189–194.
US Department for Education. (2016). The federal role in education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/fed/role.html.
Young, M. (2008). Bringing knowledge back in. London: Routledge.
Young, M., & Lambert, D. (with Roberts, C., & Roberts, M.). (2014). Knowledge and the future School: Curriculum and social justice. London: Bloomsbury.
Winch, C. (2013). Curriculum design and epistemic ascent. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 47(1), 128–146.
Wulf, A. (2015). The invention of nature. Alexander von Humboldt’s new world. London: John Murray.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lambert, D., Walshe, N. (2018). How Geography Curricula Tackle Global Issues. In: Demirci, A., Miguel González, R., Bednarz, S. (eds) Geography Education for Global Understanding. International Perspectives on Geographical Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77216-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77216-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77215-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77216-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)