Skip to main content

Transparency and Subjectivity: Remembering Jennifer Ringley

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transparency, Society and Subjectivity

Abstract

This chapter discusses the double meaning of transparency applied to subjectivity. On the one hand, transparency refers to invisibility, to a lack of subjectivity or even to psychosis. On the other hand, it refers to hypervisibility, to the exhibition of privacy, the horizon of which is indeed exhibitionism—let’s call it the Jennicam syndrome, as we will focus on one of the first lifecasters in the Internet history. We live in a media environment in which we have no choice but to swing constantly between our submission to an Orwellian Big Brother and our desire to be part of Big Brother, one of the first and most successful Reality TV shows. At the end, we might no longer know if Jenni was rather psychotic or perverse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In her account Catherine Millet writes “avilissement maximum” (maximum degradation). Cf . Millet (2001: 118).

  2. 2.

    Let’s zoom back to the Stalinist Big Brother as incarnated in one of its most terrifying versions in the Cambodia of the Khmers Rouges : it seems that in some “villages” (or death camps ?), the inhabitants were forced to hand over their excrements to the “organization” and were punished when there was not enough. Transparency (and at the same time de-subjectification, dehumanization) happen when Big Brother not only forbids the use of the pronoun “I,” as it was the case in Cambodia, but also controls your excrements. When human excrements become manure, humans become animals, that is, transparent (cf. Wolton 2015: 985–1042).

Works Cited

  • André, Serge. 1993. L’Imposture Perverse. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Raymonde. 1988. Cultural Misunderstandings. The French-American Experience. Trans Carol Volk. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clavreul, Jean. 1967. Le Couple Pervers. In Le Désir et la Perversion, ed. Piera Aulagnier, Jean Clavreul, François Perrier, Guy Rosolato, and Jean-Paul Valabrega. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Suzanne. 2008–2010. Hunger Games (3 vol.). New York: Scholastic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debord, Guy. 1995. The Society of Spectacle. Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debray, Régis. 2004. Transmitting Culture. Trans. Eric Rauth, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufour, Dany-Robert. 2009. La Cité Perverse. Libéralisme et Pornographie. Paris: Denoël.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franck, Georg. 1998. Ökonomie der Aufmerksamkeit. Munich: Carl Hanser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, Sigmund. 1953. The Sexual Aberrations. In Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. VII, trans. James Strachey. London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, Byung-Chul. 2015. The Transparency Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinich, Nathalie. 2012. De la Visibilité. Excellence et singularité en régime médiatique. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, Jacques. 1977. The Seminar, Book XI: The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. Trans, A. Sheridan. London: Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. The Seminar, Book III: The Psychoses. Translation R. Grigg. New York: Routledge/Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letterman, David. 1998. The CBS Late Night Show. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0AmIntaD5VE.

  • Millet, Catherine. 2001. La Vie sexuelle de Catherine M. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pop 17. 2008. JenniCAM Invented RealityTV. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ii0gLK3meM. Accessed 30 May 2017.

  • Pörksen, Bernhard, and Wolfgang Krischke. 2012. Die Casting-Gesellschaft. Die Sucht nach Aufmerksamkeit und das Tribunal der Medien. Köln: Halem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomä, Dieter. 2000. Unter Amerikanern. Eine Lebensart wird besichtigt. Munich: C.H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voltaire. 1978. Letter from August 30, 1755. Correspondance, vol. IV. Paris: Gallimard-Pléiade.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolton, Thierry. 2015. Histoire Mondiale du Communisme, Tome 1: Les Bourreaux. Paris: Grasset.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Kaufmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kaufmann, V. (2018). Transparency and Subjectivity: Remembering Jennifer Ringley. In: Alloa, E., Thomä, D. (eds) Transparency, Society and Subjectivity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77161-8_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics