Skip to main content

Geostrategy of the European Union in Energy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Energy Economy, Finance and Geostrategy

Abstract

Among the many problems the European Union (EU) is facing, the energy question is an important one. Climate change forces the EU to reduce the use of fossil fuel. However, security of supply of energy relies heavily on the use of fossil fuel. This creates a dilemma for EU policy. The pollution caused by gas is less than the pollution of the other fossil fuels such as coal and oil. Therefore it seems reasonable that the first reduction will take place in the use of coal and oil and later on gas. This brings us to the next problem, namely that the EU is dependent on the gas import from politically instable countries. In this chapter, we will pay attention to the reduction of the use of fossil fuel as well as to the EU policy on gas import. We give an overview of the steps that the EU has taken and shall take to realize her goals for the coming years. To secure the availability of energy the EU will face a high gas dependency for quite some time. The gas market knows a number of instable countries, which makes energy a difficult political issue. The EU has to speak with one voice. In the EU every member country has a blocking vote, which weakens the position of the EU in the negotiations with non-EU gas suppliers. An alternative is the Energy Union, where the member countries have no blocking vote but takes their decisions based on the majority of the voting countries. To operate as one block is a better position than when EU-members negotiate bilaterally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://gastechinsights.com/article/eu-seeks-strategy-to-reduce-gas-dependency

  2. 2.

    Huge thanks to Mr. Szymon Polak, First Secretary, Energy Section, Permanent Representation of the Republic of Poland to the EU, for his kind comments and ideas.

  3. 3.

    http://energypost.eu/europe-increasingly-dependent-oil-imports-russia/

  4. 4.

    www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/91508464-c661-11e3-ba0e-00144feabdc0.html%20axzz38qBBIR6P

  5. 5.

    More on: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/authors/petr-polak

References

  • Alstone P, Gershenson D, Kammen DM (2015) Decentralized energy systems for clean electricity access. Nat Clim Chang 5:305–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austvik OG (2016) The energy union and the security-gas supply. Energy Policy 96:372–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland Report (1987) Our common future: report of the world commission on environment and development, United Nations

    Google Scholar 

  • Cengis MS, Mamis MS (2015) Price-efficiency relationship for photovoltaic cells on a global basis. Int J Photoenergy 2015:256101

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2014) Commission communication on a policy framework for climate and energy from 2020 to 2030—COM(2014)0015

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2016) EU energy in figures. Statistical Pocketbook 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraunhofer ISE (2015) Current and future cost of photovoltaics. Study in behalf of Agora Energiewende

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (2016) CO2 emissions from fuel combustion—highlights 2016. OECD/IEA

    Google Scholar 

  • Karbuz S (2018) Geostrategic importance of East Mediterranean gas sources. In: Dorsman AB, Ediger VAZ, Karan MB (eds) Energy economics, finance and geostrategy. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Krozer Y, Nentjes A (2007) Milieu-innovatie en kosten van emissiereductie (environment innovation and costs of emission reduction). ESB 92(4515):452–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Misik M (2015) The influence of perception on the preferences of the new member states of the European Union: the case of energy policy. Int Issues Slovak Foreign Policy Aff 21:56–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Misik M (2017) Comments on “the energy union and security-of-gas supply”. Energy Policy 102:27–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel N, Seitz T, Yanosek K (2017) Three game changers for energy. McKinsey Quarterly, Apr 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Polak, P. (2014), How to beat goliath: an EU energy union to fight Russia’s gas monopoly. Foreign Affairs, 10 Dec 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Polak P (2015) Europe’s low energy: the promise and perils of the energy union. Foreign Affairs, 9 Sept 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Polak P (2017) The trouble with Nord stream 2: how the pipeline would benefit Russia at the EU’s expense. Foreign Affairs, 23 Aug 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipperus OT, Mulder M (2015) The effectiveness of policies to transform a gas-exporting country into a gas-transit country: the case of the Netherlands. Energy Policy 84:117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson JL (2014) The influence of economic, financial and political indicators in south east Asian electricity markets. In: Dorsman A, Gök T, Karan MB (eds) Perspectives on energy risk. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 89–102

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson JL (2015) Deregulation in electricity markets: the interplay of stability and fossil fuel prices. In: Dorsman A, Westerman W, Simpson JL (eds) Energy, technology and valuation issues. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 199–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Skea J, Chaundry M, Wang X (2012) The role of gas infrastructure in promoting UK energy security. Energy Policy 43:202–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2013) ETS RIP?. The Economist, 20 Apr 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2017a) Power transmission; rise of the supergrid. The Economist, 14 Jan 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2017b) Roadkill. The Economist, 12 Aug 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2017c) Electrifying everything. The Economist, 12 Aug 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2017d) Infrastructure for electric cars; charge of the battery brigade. The Economist, 9 Sept 2017

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André B. Dorsman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dorsman, A.B., Nentjes, A., Polak, P. (2018). Geostrategy of the European Union in Energy. In: Dorsman, A., Ediger, V., Karan, M. (eds) Energy Economy, Finance and Geostrategy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76867-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76867-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76866-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76867-0

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics