Abstract
Management education seeks to train effective and ethical business leaders. However, it has been observed for decades that in practice many of these leaders fail to consider the effectiveness or the ethical impact of their decisions on stakeholders, citizens, and the environment.
The premise of this chapter is that in a world of escalating uncertainties, plagued by complex issues such as resources constraints, climate change, and growing social inequity, business leaders should face these challenges, with the intention at least to minimize any damage their decisions might entail for society and the environment.
The chapter begins by summarizing the evolution of Singapore as a sovereign city state and its unique economic and social problems; it then examines the thesis that management education, to be both effective and ethical, should focus on the intersection of three core sectors: private, public, and civil—as identified, for example, by Lovegrove and Thomas. It describes this tri-sector approach, taken by Singapore Management University’s Post-Graduate Management Education Programme, and why it is particularly relevant to the Singaporean context.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arcadis. (2016). Sustainable Cities Index. Retrieved from https://www.arcadis.com/en/global/our-perspectives/sustainable-cities-index-2016/
Azmi, S. (2016, June 15). Singapore ranks 2nd among global cities for green buildings. Business Times.
Bennett, N. G., & Lemoine, J. (2014, January–February). What VUCA really means for you. Harvard Business Review. Issue.
Bofota, Y. B. (2012). Social capital, human capital and economic development: Theoretical model and empirical analyses. Presses univ. de Louvain.
Cao, L. (2016). Culture in law and development: Nurturing positive change. Oxford University Press.
Castells, M. (2010). End of millennium: The information age: Economy, society, and culture (Vol. 3). John Wiley & Sons.
Connelly, M. A. (2016, June 21). Monocle names Hong Kong and Singapore among world’s most liveable cities. Living. Retrieved from http://www.lifestyleasia.com/471908/monocle-names-hong-kong-singapore-among-worlds-livable-cities/
Fuchs, E., & Jacobs, H. (2014, May 26). The 11 cities with the most opportunity right now. Business Insider Australia.
Hoffman, B., & Ritchie, D. (1997, March). Using multimedia to overcome the problems with problem based learning. Instructional Science, 25(2), 97–115.
Howieson, B., & Hodges, J. (2014). Public and third sector leadership: Experience speaks. Emerald Group Publishing.
Huff, W. G. (1997). The economic growth of Singapore: Trade and development in the twentieth century. Cambridge University Press.
Hui, C. (2016, March 28). Ageing population, global competition among challenges Singapore must contend with. Channel NewsAsia.
IGI Global. (2011). Organizational learning and knowledge: Concepts, methodologies, tools and applications (Vols. 1–4). IGI Global.
Inam, H. (2017, October 18). To lead in a VUCA world, practice leadership agility. Forbes.
Joiner, W. B., & Josephs, S. A. (2007). Leadership agility: Five levels of mastery for anticipating and initiating change. John Wiley & Sons.
Koh, T. (2016, October 15). Small and successful. The Straits Times.
Kraar, L. (2015, March 23). Singapore, the country run like a corporation. Fortune. (This Fortune article first ran in July 1974 and again in 2015 to mark the passing of Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore’s first and longest-serving prime minister, and the architect of the nation’s remarkable transformation).
Liang, L. Y. (2016, March 29). Four key challenges for Singapore in next 50 years. Straits Times.
Lim, J., & Lee, T. (2016). Singapore: Negotiating state and society, 1965–2015. Routledge.
Lovegrove, N., & Thomas, M. (2013, February 13). Why the world needs tri-sector leaders. Harvard Business Review.
Manyika, J. (2017, May 2017). Technology, jobs and the future of work. McKinsey Global Institute.
Middleton, P. (2010). Delivering public services that work. Triarchy Press Limited.
Miller, M. (2012, May 12). What Singapore can teach us. Washington Post.
Nambisan, S., & Nambisan, P. (2013, January). Engaging citizens in co-creation in public services: Lessons learned and best practices. IBM Center for the Business of Government.
OECD. (2011, September 29). Guidelines for multinational enterprises (2011 edition). OECD Publishing.
PwC. (2016, September 7). London ranks top in PwC Cities of Opportunity Index, followed by Singapore and Toronto. PWC News Release.
Richardson, J., & Lee, E. O. L. (2012, September). The improbable resilience of Singapore. The Solutions Journal, 3(5), 63–71.
Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3), 235–276. Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
SMU. (2016, May 12). Tri-sector forum 2016—Understanding the power of cross-sector partnership for solving complex problems in finance, food, sustainability, and society. Singapore Management University.
SMU. (2017a). Master of tri-sector collaboration; Creating thought leaders to bridge business, government and civil society. Singapore Management University; SMU Tri-Sector Publication 2017.pdf; Retrieved December 22, 2017.
SMU. (2017b). Tri-sector partnerships for sustainable development. Singapore Management University School of Social Sciences. Retrieved December 23, 2017.
SMU. (2017c). Master of Tri-Sector Collaboration (MTSC). Singapore Management University. Retrieved December 20, 2017, from https://www.smu.edu.sg/programmes/postgraduate/master-tri-sector-collaboration
Tasch, B. (2017, March 6). Ranked: The 30 richest countries in the world. Business Insider.
TodayOnline. (2015, December 12). The big read: Making Singapore a better place for workers who come from afar. TodayOnline.
Warhurst, A. (2001). Corporate citizenship and corporate social investment drivers of tri-sector partnerships. Greenleaf Publishing Ltd. JCC 1 Spring.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
The views expressed in this chapter are the author’s, and do not represent the views of the Singapore Management University or the Singapore University of Social Sciences.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wang, J. (2018). Tri-Sector Leadership and Collaboration in Management Education: The Case of Singapore. In: Christopher, E. (eds) Meeting Expectations in Management Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76412-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76412-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76411-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76412-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)