Abstract
Changes in operational risk environment caused by globalization, information technology development and deregulations, have been significantly influencing banking industry and operational risk management process. This continuous evolution has forced to create an appropriate regulatory framework. Starting from Basel I Accord where market and credit risk were controlled, Basel II regulatory framework introduced an operational risk category and capital requirements for the losses connected with operational risk. The problem has raised during and after the financial crisis, when despite an increase in the number and severity of operational risk events, capital requirements for operational risk remained stable or even fell for the standardized approaches. As a consequence, the new Standardized Approach was proposed in 2015 and implemented by most biggest banks. The aim of the paper is to compare different approaches proposed under Basel II for modeling operational risk and to discuss new Basel IV proposals of regulatory capital charge for the operational risk.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akkizidis IS, Bouchereau V (2005) Guide to optimal operational risk & Basel II. Taylor & Francis, LLC, Boca Raton, FL
BCBS (2001) Working paper on the regulatory treatment of operational risk. BIS. http://www.bis.org. Accessed 10 Aug 2017
BCBS (2006) Observed range of practice in key elements of Advanced Measurement Approaches (AMA). BIS. http://www.bis.org. Accessed 10 Aug 2017
BCBS (2011) Principles for the sound management of operational risk. BIS. http://www.bis.org. Accessed 10 Aug 2017
BCBS (2014) Operational risk — revisions to the simpler approaches — consultative document. BIS. http://www.bis.org. Accessed 10 Aug 2017
BCBS (2016) Standardised measurement approach for operational risk – consultative document. BIS. http://www.bis.org. Accessed 10 Aug 2017
Chernobai AS, Rachev ST, Fabozzi FJ (2007) Operational risk. A guide to Basel II capital requirements, models, and analysis. Wiley, Hoboken
Chorofas DN (2003) Operationl risk control with Basel II. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
Cruz MG (2002) Modeling, measuring and hedging operational risk. Wiley, Hoboken
Esterhuysen J, Styger P, van Vuuren G (2008) Calculating operational value-at-risk (OpVaR) in a retail bank. SAJEMS NS 11 No 1
European Parliament (2016) European Parliament resolution of 23 November 2016 on the finalisation of Basel III (2016/2959(RSP))
Gregoriou GN (2009) Operational Risk toward Basel III. Wiley, Hoboken
Haubenstock M, Hause J (2006) Practical decisions to successfully model operational risk capital. In: Davis E (ed) The advanced measurement approach to operational risk. Risk Books, London, pp 15–36
Hussain A (2000) Managing operational risk in financial markets. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
King JL (2001) Operational risk. Measurement and modelling. Wiley, Hoboken
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dziwok, E. (2018). Different Approaches to Regulatory Capital Calculation for Operational Risk. In: Jajuga, K., Locarek-Junge, H., Orlowski, L. (eds) Contemporary Trends and Challenges in Finance. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76228-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76228-9_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76227-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76228-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)