Skip to main content

Edvard Munch as Psychotherapist: “The Horse Cure”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Psychotherapy, Literature and the Visual and Performing Arts

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture ((PASCC))

Abstract

Munch’s strongest canonical works offer us a special “reading” of how the mind under stress works. “The Scream” expresses a spellbinding awareness that our inner anxiety and pain not only spill out into the world, but that the roiled-up elements (sky, water) themselves penetrate the porous subject, leaving us to wonder whether the “scream” comes from within or without. “Jealousy” is a diptych of the diseased imagination, showing at once the suffering lover and the generated, imagined betrayal. “Melancholy” depicts Munch’s mentally ill sister Laura in a setting of multiple imprisonments, yielding a symphonic portrait of lostness. These extremist renditions of psychological pain refigure our relation to others and to the world—as such they are of great value to psychotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Edmund Wilson’s pathbreaking essay on Philoctetes in his superb book, The Wound and the Bow (New York: Oxford UP, 1965), a suite of essays on the relation between psychic damage and the creation of art ; Wilson’s title stems from the paradox of the Greek play: the man with an incurable wound also possesses a magic bow, but the community cannot have the bow without the wound. It is worth bearing in mind that this view of wound-as-useful goes strictly counter to the Greek concern with contamination and defilement, often leading to scapegoating measures in the old plays.

  2. 2.

    Quoted in Sue Prideaux’s fine Behind the Scream (New Haven: Yale UP, 2005), pp. 245–246. An invaluable resource here is Poul Erik Tøjner’s Munch: In His Own Words (Munich/London/New York), 2001; even if one knows that Munch kept a running account of his life and feelings, this book yields a portrait of Munch as quasi-novelist.

  3. 3.

    Quoted by Göran Söderström in his magisterial Strindberg och Bildkonsten (Stockholm: Forum, 1990), p. 304. Strindberg , largely known in the Western world as writer, was a remarkable painter in his own right (as well as being a shrewd art critic), and his pieces probably command the highest prices of any paintings found in Sweden today.

  4. 4.

    Quoted in Michael Meyer, Strindberg: A Biography (New York: Random House, 1985), pp. 288–289.

  5. 5.

    Cited by Prideaux, p. 175.

  6. 6.

    Quoted in Arne Eggum, Edvard Munch: Paintings, Sketches, and Studies (New York: Clarkson N. Potter, 1984), p. 81.

  7. 7.

    Not surprisingly, there are some modern scholars, such as Patricia Berman (in Edvard Munch: The Modern Life of the Soul [ed. Kynaston McShine, New York: Museum of Modern Art, 2006], pp. 35–51), who are deeply suspicious of Munch’s grandiose pronouncements about madness and the like; they contend that he was a canny figure bent on producing and managing his image, and that we need to be alert to the posturing and stratagems associated with his persona. I find this position intelligent but wrong-headed; it seems to me that its distrust of the artist —turning him into something of a performance artist —yields dubious results while locking us out of what is epochal in his work.

  8. 8.

    Lionel Trilling, The Liberal Imagination (New York: Doubleday, 1953), pp. 155–175.

References

  • Berman, P. (2006). In K. McShine (Ed.), Edvard Munch: The Modern Life of the Soul (pp. 35–51). New York: Museum of Modern Art.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggum, A. (1984). Edvard Munch: Paintings, Sketches, and Studies (p. 81). New York: Clarkson N. Potter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. (1985). Strindberg: A Biography (pp. 288–289). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prideaux, S. (2005). Behind the Scream (pp. 245–246). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderström, G. (1990). Strindberg och Bildkonsten (p. 304). Stockholm: Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trilling, L. (1953). The Liberal Imagination (pp. 155–175). New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. (1965). Philoctetes. In The Wound and the Bow. Seven Studies in Literature. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnold Weinstein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Weinstein, A. (2018). Edvard Munch as Psychotherapist: “The Horse Cure”. In: Kirkcaldy, B. (eds) Psychotherapy, Literature and the Visual and Performing Arts. Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75423-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics