Abstract
Confocal Raman microscopes are the instruments of choice for chemical characterization in a wide variety of applications including geosciences (Jenniskens et al., in Nature 458(7237): 485, 2009 [1]), (Rotundi et al., in Planet Sci 43(1–2):367, 2008, [2]), (Heim et al., Geobiology in 10(4):280, 2012 [3]), biology (Hild et al., in J Struct Biol 168(3):426, 2009 [4]), (Gierlinger and Schwanninger, in J Spectrosc 21(2):69, 2007 [5]), (Hermelink et al., in Analyst 134(6):1149, 2009 [6]), nano-carbon materials (Xu et al., in ACS nano 5(1):147, 2010 [7]), (You et al., in Appl Phys Lett 93(10):103111, 2008 [8]), (Yu et al., in J Phys Chem C 112(33):12602, 2008 [9]) and pharmaceutics (Matthäus et al., in Mol Pharm 5(2):287, 2008 [10]), (Chernenko et al., in ACS nano 3(11):3552, 2009 [11]) to name but a few. Many pertinent examples can be found within this book. This chapter intends to shed light on the possibilities of confocal Raman systems in general, while briefly reviewing their origins and describing considerations such as spectral and spatial resolution as well as throughput. 3D confocal Raman imaging as well as compensation for surface topography during a confocal Raman image scan will also be outlined.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Sample curtesy José M.F. Swart, AkzoNobel Chemicals bv, Deventer, The Netherlands.
- 2.
References
P. Jenniskens, M. Shaddad, D. Numan, S. Elsir, A. Kudoda, M. Zolensky, L. Le, G. Robinson, J. Friedrich, D. Rumble et al., Nature 458(7237), 485 (2009)
A. Rotundi, G. Baratta, J. Borg, J. Brucato, H. Busemann, L. Colangeli, L. d’Hendecourt, Z. Djouadi, G. Ferrini, I. Franchi et al., Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 43(1–2), 367 (2008)
C. Heim, J. Lausmaa, P. Sjövall, J. Toporski, T. Dieing, K. Simon, B. Hansen, A. Kronz, G. Arp, J. Reitner et al., Geobiology 10(4), 280 (2012)
S. Hild, F. Neues, N. Žnidaršič, J. Štrus, M. Epple, O. Marti, A. Ziegler, J. Struct. Biol. 168(3), 426 (2009)
N. Gierlinger, M. Schwanninger, J. Spectrosc. 21(2), 69 (2007)
A. Hermelink, A. Brauer, P. Lasch, D. Naumann, Analyst 134(6), 1149 (2009)
Y.N. Xu, D. Zhan, L. Liu, H. Suo, Z.H. Ni, T.T. Nguyen, C. Zhao, Z.X. Shen, ACS Nano 5(1), 147 (2010)
Y. You, T. Yu, J. Kasim, H. Song, X. Fan, Z. Ni, L. Cao, H. Jiang, D. Shen, J. Kuo et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 93(10), 103111 (2008)
T. Yu, Z. Ni, C. Du, Y. You, Y. Wang, Z. Shen, J. Phys. Chem. C 112(33), 12602 (2008)
C. Matthäus, A. Kale, T. Chernenko, V. Torchilin, M. Diem, Mol. Pharm. 5(2), 287 (2008)
T. Chernenko, C. Matthäus, L. Milane, L. Quintero, M. Amiji, M. Diem, ACS Nano 3(11), 3552 (2009)
L. Rayleigh, Lond. Edinburgh Dublin Phil. Mag. J. Sci. 42(255), 167 (1896)
R. Millar, K. Gallacher, A. Samarelli, J. Frigerio, D. Chrastina, T. Dieing, G. Isella, D. Paul, Thin Solid Films (2015)
R. Millar, K. Gallacher, A. Samarelli, J. Frigerio, D. Chrastina, G. Isella, T. Dieing, D. Paul, Opt. Express (2015)
M. Shur, Physics of Semiconductor Devices (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1990)
F. Adar, (2010). http://www.spectroscopyonline.com/depth-resolution-raman-microscope-optical-limitations-and-sample-characteristics
C.A. Mack, Microlith. World 13(1), 14 (2004)
S. Wilhelm, B. Gröbler, M. Gluch, H. Heinz, Jena, Germany: Carl Zeiss Advanced Imaging Microscopy p. 258 (2003). http://zeiss-campus.magnet.fsu.edu/referencelibrary/pdfs/ZeissConfocalPrinciples.pdf
N. Everall, Spectrosc.-Springfield Eugene Duluth- 19, 22 (2004)
N. Everall, Spectrosc.-Springfield Eugene Duluth- 19, 16 (2004)
N. Everall, J. Raman Spectrosc. 45(1), 133 (2014)
P. Lasch, A. Hermelink, D. Naumann, Analyst 134(6), 1162 (2009)
WITec GmbH. True surface microscopy (2017). http://www.witec.de/products/accessories/truesurface/
S. Ayas, G. Cinar, A.D. Ozkan, Z. Soran, O. Ekiz, D. Kocaay, A. Tomak, P. Toren, Y. Kaya, I. Tunc, et al., Sci. Rep. 3 (2013)
C. Roider, M. Ritsch-Marte, A. Jesacher, Opt. Lett. 41(16), 3825 (2016)
R.M. Stöckle, Y.D. Suh, V. Deckert, R. Zenobi, Chem. Phys. Lett. 318(1), 131 (2000)
N. Hayazawa, Y. Inouye, Z. Sekkat, S. Kawata, Opt. Commun. 183(1), 333 (2000)
M.S. Anderson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76(21), 3130 (2000)
E. Bailo, V. Deckert, Chem. Soc. Rev. 37(5), 921 (2008)
T. Schmid, L. Opilik, C. Blum, R. Zenobi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52(23), 5940 (2013)
A. Weber-Bargioni, A. Schwartzberg, M. Cornaglia, A. Ismach, J.J. Urban, Y. Pang, R. Gordon, J. Bokor, M.B. Salmeron, D.F. Ogletree et al., Nano Lett. 11(3), 1201 (2011)
G. Rusciano, G. Zito, R. Isticato, T. Sirec, E. Ricca, E. Bailo, A. Sasso, ACS Nano 8(12), 12300 (2014)
G. Zito, G. Rusciano, A. Vecchione, G. Pesce, R. Di Girolamo, A. Malafronte, A. Sasso, Sci. Rep. 6 (2016)
K. Burns, K.B. Adams, J. Longwell, JOSA 40(6), 339 (1950)
G. Norlén, Physica Scripta 8(6), 249 (1973)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
A. Appendix
A. Appendix
1.1 A.1 Ideal Performance Test Samples
Based on the methods and theories described in this chapter, ideal samples for performance determination are outlined in the following. An ideal system can achieve optimal results for each of the categories in the same configuration.
1.1.1 A.1.1 Lateral Resolution
Ideal sample: Isolated Single- or Multi-walled Carbon Nano-Tubes (CNTs)
-
Recommended maximum diameter: 75 nm
-
Recommended minimum length: 1 \(\upmu \)m
-
Recommended substrate: Si or glass (required for resolution determination using immersion objectives)
1.1.2 A.1.2 Depth Resolution and Confocality
Ideal sample: Suspended Graphene or Ultrathin Graphite or Si when using only the rising flank of the depth profile
-
Recommended maximum sample thickness (for suspended samples): 50 nm
-
Recommended minimum hole diameter (for the suspended part): 5–10 \(\upmu \)m
-
Recommended substrate: Si
1.1.3 A.1.3 Spectral Resolution
Ideal sample: Atomic Emission Lines
The emission should be guided along exactly the same beam path as the scattered Raman light.
-
Recommended emission lines: Within the Raman detection range.
532 nm: Hg @ 546.0735 nm [34]
785 nm: Ar @ 912.2967 nm [35]
1.1.4 A.1.4 Throughput
Ideal sample: Si
Crucial parameters for possible comparison:
-
Laser power
-
Laser wavelength
-
Objective
-
Spectral dispersion @ \(\approx \)1950 rel. cm\(^{-1}\)
-
Integration time
-
Confocality (measured by comparison of the peak height of the 4th order Si peak relative to the intensity of the O\(_\text {2}\) and N\(_\text {2}\) emission lines - see Fig. 6.15).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dieing, T. (2018). Resolution and Performance of 3D Confocal Raman Imaging Systems. In: Toporski, J., Dieing, T., Hollricher, O. (eds) Confocal Raman Microscopy. Springer Series in Surface Sciences, vol 66. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75380-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75380-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75378-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75380-5
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)